Posted - 2011.06.22 06:49:00 - [332]

 

[X]

I miss my ship spinning. CQ looks great, but it's summer and I don't want to fry my PC. CCP clearly isn't listening.

Posted - 2011.06.22 06:51:00 - [334]

 

x

Posted - 2011.06.22 06:54:00 - [336]

 

X

Posted - 2011.06.22 06:56:00 - [338]

 

X

Posted - 2011.06.22 06:57:00 - [340]

 

X

And give us back the hangar view. Right now you have to check the fitting screen or have a very close look where the 2 bold bars are in your ship hangar to make sure in what ship you are right now.

That will cause hilarious undocking moments for sure.

Posted - 2011.06.22 06:59:00 - [342]

 

Edited by: Xavier Gaunt on 22/06/2011 07:01:39
Edited by: Xavier Gaunt on 22/06/2011 07:01:00
While I get reasonable FPS with two clients from my older PC and good FPS with 3 on the newer PC (30s and 40-50s respectively - optimised for quality) I'm x'ing up in this to support.

After all it kind of goes against "canon" to get out of your pod if you're just docking up to swap ships. After all isn't that what the background of the pod was, that it's an interchangable, universal control system. Whatever happened to the original "optional" (and yes I have seen the posts by others here and Akita T originally but the question is still pertinent) and optional doesn't mean "oh we kept the station buttons for you so that you have the option not to walk to individual consoles in the CQ to do stuff".

I liked the original principle as it was proposed/demonstrated a few years back at Fanfest, I liked the idea of a meeting room where you could meet key corp/alliance buddies and plan stuff demonstrating it on a map and/or highlighting stuff everyone could see. Nice in theory but that's all it seems to have been. I get more and more of the impression that with CQ we're not only testing the planned "Carbon" engine for World of Darkness but that CCP are looking to market/license the Carbon technology suite to other MMO makers in the not too distant future so they can buy their own Carribean island to work from and not pay taxes in the future (apart from into the CCP pension fund!), otherwise all the "de-specialisation" of things?

Though it is good that "merge hanger/items" still works on the side panel as well, quite possibly one of the best features in the "esc" menu, though it's been there quite a while (and no before the haters start I haven't just found it, I've been reminding friends it's there )

Posted - 2011.06.22 07:00:00 - [344]

 

Posted - 2011.06.22 07:02:00 - [346]

 

Originally by: Grimpak

---

X

bring old hangar back and "enter CQ" button. best of two worlds.

---

I agree with the voices of Grimpak

Posted - 2011.06.22 07:08:00 - [348]

 

Posted - 2011.06.22 07:12:00 - [350]

 

X

My main PC runs it fine but it adds nothing and loading is a bit slow.

However I do play using a laptop sometimes, worked fine before CQ but just painful with CQ on.

Posted - 2011.06.22 07:17:00 - [352]

 

x

it works on one account, but the rest suffer dearly. i used to be able to run up to 3 accounts with maxed settings, but no longer. because of incarnia, i have setup 2 eve clients: one for high quality with cq enabled, and one with the lowest possible settings along with cq disabled for my alts. i pity the dual boxing mission runner. i also pity myself, for if cq and incarnia are made mandatory, then i wouldn't be able to dual box, let alone triple box. you guys do realize that people will trim their accounts if this continues, yes? i don't think eye pieces will make up the difference. your economist is a ******, by the way.

Posted - 2011.06.22 07:20:00 - [354]

 

x, well, I will check it out quickly, but after that, x :p

Bring our ship spinning back already goddamn CCP, you ruins it!

Posted - 2011.06.22 07:22:00 - [356]

 

x - 'cause u'r forced to use it(or pointed towards the "exit" door of EVE)
X - for both my main and my alt so i can play (i7-2600 3.40GHz, GTX 460)
X - 'cause i never cared about walking in station, y not making it "optional" like everything else in this game?

extra lol @ the Noble Rip-Off, 1PLEX = 3500 aur -> Eyepatch glassy implant = 12.000 aur......
never liked the idea of the MT store (this is not even Micro to begin with), now i hope CCP will NEVER insert in there something "mandatory" for the gameplay..

cya

Posted - 2011.06.22 07:26:00 - [358]

 

X

With two clients docked, I was running a constant 95-99% GPU usage/40-45% CPU usage. No thanks (I've got a pretty damn high-quality pc, just for the record).

Posted - 2011.06.22 07:41:00 - [360]

 

Is this the place where I can say I told you so CCP? You where warned over and over and over and over and over again and you treated us like children. Now I think someone at CCP might be looking for a new job.

I have 2 accounts, but am not turning off CQ because I have been looking forward to it and would rather look at something rather than a static screen... But forcing it is crap and we all know it!!!

Problems I See right off the bat:

[]Spawns my character facing the wrong direction (why is my ship behind me where I cant see it?

[]I can no longer drag a ship to the hangar to activate it

[]Can no longer double my ship click to get at cargo

[]Can no longer access other right-click options by clicking on the ship

[]Hangar view seems to have mysteriously disappeared

[]My bed doesn't work, why is it there if I cant use it?

[]Warp tunnel bug is still around. You had time to do all this but you cant fix warp tunnels?

Don't worry CCP, you can expect me to be filing a new bug report for every one of those. Did anyone even test this stuff? Hopefully CCP will come to their senses and fix these obviously obvious issues before the entire game comes crashing down around them.