open All Channels
seplocked EVE General Discussion
blankseplocked Incursion / Incarna docking time comparison
 
This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 
Pages: 1 [2]

Author Topic

Grey Stormshadow
Starwreck Industries
Posted - 2011.05.29 02:35:00 - [31]
 

"Optimizing" as in "Did you delete the comment lines already?".

Soden Rah
Gallente
EVE University
Ivy League
Posted - 2011.05.29 02:38:00 - [32]
 

I would like to add to this that the desire for us to keep the old hanger and enter CQ optionally after docking is not all driven by min spec pc's and performance issues.
I can't verify if they are justified on those grounds as my machine runs CQ fine.
There is also the RP and design arguments. Either way making it optional means that those that want it can still get all the incarna goodness while those that don't can actually ignore it.
From a logic, pr, rp, and design standpoint CQ being optional makes perfect sense.
The only way it doesn't is if CCP want to make us all guinea-pigs for testing CQ out... which makes no business sense. And even if it did as a player I could never support that.

The vid is quite amusing though ;-p

Sarmatiko
Posted - 2011.05.29 12:42:00 - [33]
 

Originally by: Sadayiel
Sarmatiko dear just log back into duality and asap you get the Loading Screen for the station check how the ships/hangar mods and all the other buttons are just fully functional even if the CQ didn't loaded yet.

Yes that's my point Razz

I tried to run Duality client today on laptop which I bought for my mom in 2008 (Toshiba L300 with Celeron-M 550 2GHz, 1 GB RAM and x1300 Intel graphics Smile). It barely handles TQ client with huge loading times and 5-10 fps "in space", same in Duality. But hey, this is cheap crap for internet browsing, I bought it with purpose, not to play games.
Why would I complain if my laptop specs is lower than minimum system requirements?

Miilla
Minmatar
Hulkageddon Orphanage
Posted - 2011.05.29 12:55:00 - [34]
 

Originally by: Astroka
Edited by: Astroka on 28/05/2011 22:53:32
Two things: First of all, your computer could barely run the TQ build.

Second, the CQ build is not finished and hasn't been optimized. But I do strongly support making it optional.

Edit: Posted before I finished watching, herp derp. Kept so you can make fun of me.


Not optimised? You optimise in the design by normalising database tables and good design practices.

They are releasing it in less than 1 month and its not optimised? They do this along the way, I would hope they have a perf team giving guidence to devs and running tests along with a stress team perhaps the same.


Max Romeo
Posted - 2011.05.29 15:00:00 - [35]
 

Originally by: Miilla
They are releasing it in less than 1 month and its not optimised? They do this along the way, I would hope they have a perf team giving guidence to devs and running tests along with a stress team perhaps the same.



lmao, this isn't a working company that has an understanding of these matters. It's CCP.

Optimization is pretty much 'hey, whats the number for nvidia developer relations?' (which is bad enough as is, but they don't even do the code handover that other developers do, in before security - it just needs to be the render frontend and testing framework, but they font do that either)

And a reminder for current CCP employees : remember to sperg a bit on CCP on Glassdoor , just do it at home where you dont have prying sreegs'. It's a good read for customers too~~

Sarmatiko
Posted - 2011.05.29 15:44:00 - [36]
 

Originally by: Max Romeo
And a reminder for current CCP employees : remember to sperg a bit on CCP on Glassdoor , just do it at home where you dont have prying sreegs'. It's a good read for customers too~~

It's like 4chan where you can shiptoast about employee anonymously and registration is free for anyone without any confirmation?
Ok Laughing

Aston Martin DB5
Posted - 2011.05.29 15:54:00 - [37]
 

Nice feed man ... I haven't personally checked out CQ b/c I really want to wait for the final productLaughing!

Ghoest
Posted - 2011.05.29 15:55:00 - [38]
 

Raising nmin requirments for content that that least half the players dont want - that doesnt make sense.

Sarmatiko
Posted - 2011.05.29 16:12:00 - [39]
 

Originally by: Ghoest
Raising nmin requirments for content that that least half the players dont want - that doesnt make sense.

Link to official focus group research statistics please.

Ghoest
Posted - 2011.05.29 16:58:00 - [40]
 

Originally by: Sarmatiko
Originally by: Ghoest
Raising nmin requirments for content that that least half the players dont want - that doesnt make sense.

Link to official focus group research statistics please.


Completely anecdotal, I think that was implied.

But after talking to people in game(corp etc.) Im certain that at LEAST half the people either dont care or are actively against using Incarna every time they dock.

Dante Marcellus
Minmatar
Belligerent Underpayed Tactical Team
Posted - 2011.05.29 17:10:00 - [41]
 

lol Look at the idiots that came in and posted without carefully reading and watching the video!

This is the world we live in and these are the moron's we're given.

darkest Nightmare
Posted - 2011.05.29 17:15:00 - [42]
 

Originally by: Ghoest
Originally by: Sarmatiko
Originally by: Ghoest
Raising nmin requirments for content that that least half the players dont want - that doesnt make sense.

Link to official focus group research statistics please.


Completely anecdotal, I think that was implied.

But after talking to people in game(corp etc.) Im certain that at LEAST half the people either dont care or are actively against using Incarna every time they dock.


I remember alot of similar stuff being said about wormhole space, FW and T3... no one want anything until it is produced. Remember the ipad... everyone said, why we have netbooks

ivar R'dhak
Minmatar
Posted - 2011.05.29 17:26:00 - [43]
 

Originally by: darkest Nightmare

I remember alot of similar stuff being said about wormhole space, FW and T3... no one want anything until it is produced. Remember the ipad... everyone said, why we have netbooks
Really? Mustīve played a different game then, as I donīt remember ANY of your alleged protests to actual content CCP introduced there.

As for the idiotPad, STILL nobody needs it. But as itīs Apple the apple lemmings follow their pied piper while marketing a$$holes are again creating a need where there isnīt one.

Ghoest
Posted - 2011.05.29 18:09:00 - [44]
 

Originally by: darkest Nightmare
Originally by: Ghoest
Originally by: Sarmatiko
Originally by: Ghoest
Raising nmin requirments for content that that least half the players dont want - that doesnt make sense.

Link to official focus group research statistics please.


Completely anecdotal, I think that was implied.

But after talking to people in game(corp etc.) Im certain that at LEAST half the people either dont care or are actively against using Incarna every time they dock.


I remember alot of similar stuff being said about wormhole space, FW and T3... no one want anything until it is produced. Remember the ipad... everyone said, why we have netbooks



I dont remember anyone feeling like WH space was being forced on them - absolutely no one.

You know why? Because entrance is optional!!

And people complaining about the balance aspect of new ships has NOTHING to do with people complaining about being forced to enter living quarters when they dock.

Get a clue noob.

Katrishar
Minmatar
Rayn Enterprises
Test Alliance Please Ignore
Posted - 2011.05.29 22:12:00 - [45]
 

Nice video; be sure to watch the whole thing!


Pages: 1 [2]

This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 


The new forums are live

Please adjust your bookmarks to https://forums.eveonline.com

These forums are archived and read-only