open All Channels
seplocked Jita Park Speakers Corner
blankseplocked Alternate Candidate Match Tool - Last Chance to submit Questions
 
This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 
Author Topic

Serious Internet Politician
www.seriousinternetpolitician.com
Posted - 2011.03.12 17:46:00 - [1]
 

Edited by: Serious Internet Politician on 12/03/2011 18:52:27
Edited by: Serious Internet Politician on 12/03/2011 18:51:03
Greetings,

My alternate candidate match tool is ready for release and any last suggestions for items and issues that you'd like included in it must be made before Monday 14th. Once the tool has been opened to the public no more changes can be made.

These suggestions or statements can be relevant to all candidates or just one and should be worded so that they aren't leading where possible. Your submission will be placed where I deem it is best suited and it may edited if needed.

Depending on where your submission is placed, users will be to:
  • "Agree" or "Disagree" in varying degrees
  • Sort it against other submissions and statements
  • Assign limited points to it that represent either:
    • A Percentage of time
    • Importance to the user
    • The user's experience



Suggested Statements:
  • Buying CSM votes through direct or indirect means should not be allowed.
  • Concord needs a player militia to make its law respected in low-sec
  • Low Sec needs to be a lot more profitable for everyone
  • Killright system should be expanded
  • Pirate Mission Agents should be moved to lowsec and be only available to pirates
  • 0.0 npc shouldn't give any sec status augmentation : Concord is not there to watch


Yours,
Serious IP.

Extreme
Eye of God
Intergalactic Exports Group
Posted - 2011.03.12 18:08:00 - [2]
 

Edited by: Extreme on 12/03/2011 18:08:18
Originally by: Serious Internet Politician


Example Statements for user consideration and response:
  • CSM delegates should be able to be fired from their position





You can scratch that one from your list as at the end of CSM-2, CSM and CCP agreed on such a procedure.
In our case Pattern Clark removed himself (under CSM pressure) from Council and i replaced him.
He got removed as he never attended to meetings, he just was in CSM2 for the "free" trip to Iceland.
After this issue there is a procedure possible to remove a CSM from council.

Extreme
Eye of God
Intergalactic Exports Group
Posted - 2011.03.12 18:14:00 - [3]
 

Here's a statement for you:

* If CSM have democratic elections, then buying votes (includes lottery) should not be allowed.

Serious Internet Politician
www.seriousinternetpolitician.com
Posted - 2011.03.12 18:25:00 - [4]
 

Originally by: Extreme
Originally by: Serious Internet Politician

Example Statements for user consideration and response:
  • CSM delegates should be able to be fired from their position



You can scratch that one from your list as at the end of CSM-2, CSM and CCP agreed on such a procedure.



Its just an example.

Originally by: Extreme
Here's a statement for you:

* If CSM have democratic elections, then buying votes (includes lottery) should not be allowed.


Yes, this is an interesting question and worded well, it is now included.

Yours,
Serious IP.

Alsyth
Night Warder
Posted - 2011.03.12 18:29:00 - [5]
 


  • Concord needs a player militia to make its law respected in low-sec

  • low sec needs to be a lot more profitable for everyone

  • Killright system should be expanded

  • Pirate missions agents should be moved to lowsec and allowed only to pirates

  • 0.0 npc shouldn't give any sec status augmentation : Concord is not there to watch


Shadow Lord77
Posted - 2011.03.13 03:04:00 - [6]
 

Edited by: Shadow Lord77 on 13/03/2011 03:55:41
I'd like to know when, or if, the Tech II BPOs be removed.

So here's the bullet:

Tech 2 BPOs should be removed from game and the owners should be compensated in some way.


 

This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 


The new forums are live

Please adjust your bookmarks to https://forums.eveonline.com

These forums are archived and read-only