open All Channels
seplocked Jita Park Speakers Corner
blankseplocked CSM and Bots
 
This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 
Author Topic

OverLord Minion
Posted - 2011.03.09 21:00:00 - [1]
 

For the last few months bots have been heavily discussed on the forums and yet only one candidate clearly sets "Getting rid of Macro/bots" as one of his nine priorities...

Ms PacMan
Caldari
Eye of God
Intergalactic Exports Group
Posted - 2011.03.09 21:13:00 - [2]
 

Edited by: Ms PacMan on 09/03/2011 21:12:54


Me?


Trebor Daehdoow
Gallente
Sane Industries Inc.
Posted - 2011.03.09 21:14:00 - [3]
 

The entire of CSM 5 has been working to get CCP to allocate more resources to the fight against bots, right from the beginning of our term. During the June Summit, for example, I had several informal conversations with CCP devs about botting and RMT, and still more at subsequent meetings.

There has also been an ongoing thread in the CSM internal forum on the topic.

CCP recognizes that fighting bots deserves more resources, and they have started to allocate them. CCP Sreegs will be making a presentation on the subject at FanFest.

I discuss my position on botting and RMT in this post in my campaign thread, and mention what CCP Sreegs is up to at the end of this post.

Imigo Montoya
Wildly Inappropriate
Goonswarm Federation
Posted - 2011.03.09 21:29:00 - [4]
 

Only one? I think every CSM candidate has concern about macro use.

It's one of my main issues.

Meissa Anunthiel
Redshift Industrial
Rooks and Kings
Posted - 2011.03.09 21:32:00 - [5]
 

Originally by: OverLord Minion
For the last few months bots have been heavily discussed on the forums and yet only one candidate clearly sets "Getting rid of Macro/bots" as one of his nine priorities...


It's always been one of my priorities, and we've finally made some progress there...

We'll see later how that turns out, but I'll definitely keep pushing to get rid of them!

OverLord Minion
Posted - 2011.03.09 21:54:00 - [6]
 

Originally by: Ms PacMan
Edited by: Ms PacMan on 09/03/2011 21:12:54
Me?


That is not what the same list I see. I see:
"...
Reducing Powerblocks/ Vacuums
A kudo reward system for alliances
A fair chance to empire corporations/ alliances to settle in 0.0 space
..."

Originally by: Imigo Montoya
Only one? I think every CSM candidate has concern about macro use.

I believe that. But I was a little disappointed that only one had that explicit concern on the message on the voting list (and yes, you may even have talked about that in the forums before, but 95% of eve community doesn't know that!).

Originally by: Trebor Daehdoow
...

Thanks for a great response.

Nery Nebu
Caldari
Posted - 2011.03.09 22:09:00 - [7]
 

Vote for Trebor Re-election !

Imigo Montoya
Wildly Inappropriate
Goonswarm Federation
Posted - 2011.03.10 00:42:00 - [8]
 

Edited by: Imigo Montoya on 10/03/2011 00:42:52
Originally by: OverLord Minion
Originally by: Imigo Montoya
Only one? I think every CSM candidate has concern about macro use.

I believe that. But I was a little disappointed that only one had that explicit concern on the message on the voting list (and yes, you may even have talked about that in the forums before, but 95% of eve community doesn't know that!).


Simply searching for "macro" on the candidates page I find four who explicitly address macro use, in that medium alone.

I'm unclear about your concern...?


 

This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 


The new forums are live

Please adjust your bookmarks to https://forums.eveonline.com

These forums are archived and read-only