open All Channels
seplocked Features and Ideas Discussion
blankseplocked The ULTIMATE answer to every CLOAKY PROBLEM EVAR!
 
This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 
Pages: [1] 2

Author Topic

Gogela
Freeport Exploration
Posted - 2011.03.06 11:08:00 - [1]
 

Check it yo...

'Voila' Anti-Cloaking Pulse I

This is the answer. We have the tools! We can rebuild EVE!!!!

WHY NOT DAMNIT!!!!

NOW IS OUR TIME!!!!!!!! YARRRR!!

discuss...

Patient 2428190
DEGRREE'Fo'FREE Internet Business School
Posted - 2011.03.06 11:12:00 - [2]
 

No

Abon
Caldari
Pandorum Research Incorporated
Posted - 2011.03.06 11:13:00 - [3]
 

15 klicks range will surely scare that afk cloaker out of his safespot..oh wait..

Zaerlorth Maelkor
The Maverick Navy
Against ALL Authorities
Posted - 2011.03.06 11:14:00 - [4]
 

NEED MOAR CAPS, PLX!!!11!ELEVEN!!

Fulbert
Gallente
Posted - 2011.03.06 11:17:00 - [5]
 

Yeah we really need something to avoid anybody from escaping the damn gatecamps. Thanks.

Tres Farmer
Gallente Federation Intelligence Service
Posted - 2011.03.06 11:18:00 - [6]
 

if you feel more safe then.. go ahead, but remove cloakers from local as soon as they cloak.

4C 4F 5645
Rogue Drone Systems
Posted - 2011.03.06 11:20:00 - [7]
 

too bad there's no cloaky problem then

Mag's
the united
Negative Ten.
Posted - 2011.03.06 11:21:00 - [8]
 

Originally by: 4C 4F 5645
too bad there's no cloaky problem then


Indeed, what problem?

trevormax
Posted - 2011.03.06 11:28:00 - [9]
 

inb4 afkcloaker guy

Acac Sunflyier
Gallente
Posted - 2011.03.06 11:28:00 - [10]
 

Originally by: Mag's
Originally by: 4C 4F 5645
too bad there's no cloaky problem then


Indeed, what problem?

I know right? All the time I see "fix cloak" or "nerf cloak." the only thing this does is help gate campers. It doesn't fix the afk cloaker, if indeed that is a problem.

CCP Spitfire


C C P
C C P Alliance
Posted - 2011.03.06 11:45:00 - [11]
 

Moved from 'EVE General Discussion'.


M'ktakh
Posted - 2011.03.06 11:45:00 - [12]
 

Didnt you post this like a year ago already?

Or is there some glitch in the matrix code and I'm having ginormous deja vu?

Jaari Val'Dara
Caldari
Deep Space Nomads Corp
Posted - 2011.03.06 13:28:00 - [13]
 

I would agree to adding this item only if cloaked ships didn't appear in local.

Davelantor
Caldari
The Resistance Movement
Posted - 2011.03.06 13:41:00 - [14]
 

Solution FAIL

-1

Naomi Wildfire
Amarr
Spricer
Raiden.
Posted - 2011.03.06 14:37:00 - [15]
 

For a solution, there has to be a problem.

Selinate
Amarr
Posted - 2011.03.06 17:32:00 - [16]
 

Edited by: Selinate on 06/03/2011 17:32:14
There is no problem with cloak.

Now please, use your brain cells, and post a constructive argument for getting rid of local, then the "Afk cloaker problem" will be gone. Anything affecting cloak itself is just stupid, and you're obviously just some idiot pirate who gets mad when cloakers get through your gate camp (which they should since they were MADE to do this).

Gogela
Freeport Exploration
Posted - 2011.03.06 20:08:00 - [17]
 

Originally by: M'ktakh
Didnt you post this like a year ago already?

Or is there some glitch in the matrix code and I'm having ginormous deja vu?


Wow. You would remember something like that? Man I wouldn't even remember making such a post. Very flattering thank you. Surprised

oh.. and yes i am a pirate gatecamper...

TharOkha
Posted - 2011.03.06 20:25:00 - [18]
 

"...me wants easy targets..."

Another "hardcore PVPer" calling for easy targets Rolling Eyes.

Belfelmalak
Posted - 2011.03.07 11:23:00 - [19]
 

Hmmmm....No.

Gogela
Freeport Exploration
Posted - 2011.03.07 18:12:00 - [20]
 

Originally by: TharOkha
"...me wants easy targets..."

Another "hardcore PVPer" calling for easy targets Rolling Eyes.


...you know I thought I made the distinction between piracy and pvp'ers pretty clear. I just want the chance to solo tackle anything. The get-out-of-lowsec-free option needs to be taken off the table. That is what I am saying. If something is "uncatchable" than there is a problem.

Baaldor
Black Sail Anarchists
Yarr Collective
Posted - 2011.03.07 19:08:00 - [21]
 

Edited by: Baaldor on 07/03/2011 19:13:44
Originally by: Gogela
Originally by: TharOkha
"...me wants easy targets..."

Another "hardcore PVPer" calling for easy targets Rolling Eyes.


...you know I thought I made the distinction between piracy and pvp'ers pretty clear. I just want the chance to solo tackle anything. The get-out-of-lowsec-free option needs to be taken off the table. That is what I am saying. If something is "uncatchable" than there is a problem.


Ok I can't find teh post, where you showed the distinction between pirate and pvp'rs. I am kind of curious...what is the difference between pirates and pvp'rs?

I have never seen an uncatchable internet space ship in Eve, hard to catch yes, uncatchable....no.

mkmin
Posted - 2011.03.07 19:17:00 - [22]
 

Edited by: mkmin on 07/03/2011 19:17:50
Originally by: Gogela
Originally by: TharOkha
"...me wants easy targets..."

Another "hardcore PVPer" calling for easy targets Rolling Eyes.


...you know I thought I made the distinction between piracy and pvp'ers pretty clear. I just want the chance to solo tackle anything. The get-out-of-lowsec-free option needs to be taken off the table. That is what I am saying. If something is "uncatchable" than there is a problem.


If someone's better at you at EVE then they should win. You suck at EVE, you should lose. Nothing's broken.

ShahFluffers
Ice Fire Warriors
Posted - 2011.03.07 20:49:00 - [23]
 

Edited by: ShahFluffers on 07/03/2011 20:51:31
Originally by: Gogela

I just want the chance to solo tackle anything.


Not everything in this game is meant to be done solo. Get friends.

More than that, your idea/mod has more far reaching consequences that you're peddling.

Not Supported.

TharOkha
Posted - 2011.03.07 20:59:00 - [24]
 

Originally by: Gogela
I just want the chance to solo tackle anything.


In other words ,you demand "I WIN" Button Rolling Eyes.

Gogela
Freeport Exploration
Posted - 2011.03.07 21:24:00 - [25]
 

Originally by: Baaldor
Edited by: Baaldor on 07/03/2011 19:13:44
Originally by: Gogela
Originally by: TharOkha
"...me wants easy targets..."

Another "hardcore PVPer" calling for easy targets Rolling Eyes.


...you know I thought I made the distinction between piracy and pvp'ers pretty clear. I just want the chance to solo tackle anything. The get-out-of-lowsec-free option needs to be taken off the table. That is what I am saying. If something is "uncatchable" than there is a problem.


Ok I can't find teh post, where you showed the distinction between pirate and pvp'rs. I am kind of curious...what is the difference between pirates and pvp'rs?

I have never seen an uncatchable internet space ship in Eve, hard to catch yes, uncatchable....no.


Ah.. it was another thread. Well than...

Originally by: Gogela
There are PvPers that just kill everyone, and then there are pirates that try to sc**** together a living on the contents of haulers caught on gate. The latter is a hard way to make some dough I'll admit, but it's also fun when you get a good one. They can make all the days of waiting or getting worthless kills over and over and loosing ships all the time totally worth it. I can't speak for everyone, but as a casual gamer (relatively speaking) it is my favorite way to play.


I'm not looking for an "I win" button... I'm looking for a way to stop a ship that can warp cloaked in low sec. It should be possible... but unless you went full ****** before jumping to another system, you will do fine simply cloaking and warping away on the other side. There should be some way to stop them. What exists right now is an "I win" button for low sec haulers, and that's what I oppose. No one should be invulnerable... so no TharOkha your assessment is way off. I think it would be appropriate for one to say I demand the end to all "I win" buttons. ...what do you want TharOkha? Maybe we should just turn all of eve into empire and issue everyone a polaris. would that be safe enough for you? Stay in empire.

Mag's
the united
Negative Ten.
Posted - 2011.03.07 21:43:00 - [26]
 

Edited by: Mag''s on 08/03/2011 09:19:40

Nothing is 100%, including cloaking haulers. We catch them, the fact that you don't is an issue with your skills, not bad game design.
Do we catch every ship? No and neither should we, the difference is you don't find us whining about it.

Plus have you considered, that this device may have the same limitation that smartbombs have? Which makes the whole point of your thread, well, pointless.

Covert Kitty
Amarr
SRS Industries
SRS.
Posted - 2011.03.08 00:08:00 - [27]
 

Quote:
Area of effect: 15000 m


This is one of the many test/nonsense items in the sql database. I assume you are one of those "anti afk cloaking" fools. It should be pointed out that this module doesn't appear to be such a thing. It has an area of effect of 15k, so basically its a no damage smartbomb with twice the range of a large emp.

Either way I don't really think we need it.

TharOkha
Posted - 2011.03.08 08:27:00 - [28]
 

Edited by: TharOkha on 08/03/2011 08:31:33
Originally by: Gogela
..what do you want TharOkha? Maybe we should just turn all of eve into empire and issue everyone a polaris. would that be safe enough for you? Stay in empire.


So now you think that im some kind of hisec carebear?! Rolling Eyes Man, i lived in lowsec long enough to post here some statement about this ridiculous thread. I had encoutered many types of the gangs, some of them was state-of-the-art gangs, that even my interceptor with 1,5s align time and 6km/s speed + cloak couldnt escape them. And also i encoutered noobs gangs and they couldnt catch even my slow BS. So if you think that some ships are "uncatchable" you are wrong. You just suck at gatecamping. ugh btw 15km area of effect? yea, you truly demand "I WIN" button Rolling Eyes

Robert Caldera
Posted - 2011.03.08 09:46:00 - [29]
 

Originally by: Gogela
'Voila' Anti-Cloaking Pulse I


Anti-Cloaking Pulse crap again *sigh*
"No" all the previous times and "no" this time again.

Van Derka
Posted - 2011.03.08 10:10:00 - [30]
 

Why not? Because a cloak is a cloak damnit!
A cloaked ship is already crippled, why try and cripple it further with a mod that makes the cloak useless?


Pages: [1] 2

This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 


The new forums are live

Please adjust your bookmarks to https://forums.eveonline.com

These forums are archived and read-only