open All Channels
seplocked Jita Park Speakers Corner
blankseplocked [CSM6] Re-Elect Meissa Anunthiel
 
This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 
Pages: 1 [2]

Author Topic

Lord Maldoror
Fairlight Corp
Rooks and Kings
Posted - 2011.03.11 01:27:00 - [31]
 

Deservedly the longest-serving CSM & long may it continue. Meissa works harder to help improve this strange place in the stars that we call home, than anyone I've ever met.

Trebor Daehdoow
Gallente
Sane Industries Inc.
Posted - 2011.03.11 12:13:00 - [32]
 

A well-deserved bump for Meissa. He doesn't make a lot of noise, but his qualifications are strong. A vote for Meissa will not be a wasted vote.

(a vote for me will be better, of course! Twisted Evil)

Serious Internet Politician
www.seriousinternetpolitician.com
Posted - 2011.03.11 16:19:00 - [33]
 

Meissa is probably hard at work one vs one'ing in local and I don't know what a CSM would be like without him, so goodluck where ever you are and I hope to spahm you on Facebook soon Laughing

Originally by: Trebor Daehdoow
"all your votes are belong to me"

Please stop recycling my campaign from last year



Meissa Anunthiel
Redshift Industrial
Rooks and Kings
Posted - 2011.03.12 00:36:00 - [34]
 

Originally by: Serious Internet Politician
Meissa is probably hard at work one vs one'ing in local and I don't know what a CSM would be like without him, so goodluck where ever you are and I hope to spahm you on Facebook soon Laughing



Hehehe, how did you guess?

To each their own, I like to do my campaigning up close and personal ;-)

And thanks mate, I hope there's enough sensible people to get the right people in :-)

Headlong
Katzbalger Industries
Posted - 2011.03.14 20:13:00 - [35]
 

Meissa is not only a very clever and intelligent guy, he's also a cool to fly with.Not to mention the effort he puts into the affairs of the CSM. gl with your candidacy :)

Batharis
Caldari
Posted - 2011.03.15 01:08:00 - [36]
 

impressed bump for a hardworking independent with the experience of 4 csm terms. Exactly what the doctor ordered amid all the partisan/block vote stuff.

Meissa Anunthiel
Redshift Industrial
Rooks and Kings
Posted - 2011.03.15 16:50:00 - [37]
 

Originally by: Batharis
impressed bump for a hardworking independent with the experience of 4 csm terms.
Exactly what the doctor ordered amid all the partisan/block vote stuff.


This time more than ever...

Thanks for the votes :-)

Seliah
Minmatar
Guillotine Therapy
Rooks and Kings
Posted - 2011.03.15 20:35:00 - [38]
 

A bump for a friend, an alliance mate and an excellent player ! I've had the chance to have long talks with Meissa about EVE, and I've got to say I'm impressed by his excellent view of all the aspects of the game in their globality. I trust him to make the right choices for the game and the universe we all enjoy.

Kiari Erratic
Posted - 2011.03.15 21:41:00 - [39]
 

+1 Meissa Very Happy

Kieser Soze
Posted - 2011.03.18 19:23:00 - [40]
 

Working hard to keep our glorious game fun!

U have my vote!


Sonya Rayner
Fairlight Corp
Rooks and Kings
Posted - 2011.03.19 17:49:00 - [41]
 

You have my vote!

Portable Decoy
Minmatar
Fairlight Corp
Rooks and Kings
Posted - 2011.03.19 18:04:00 - [42]
 

Edited by: Portable Decoy on 19/03/2011 18:06:28


+3 votes from me, keep up the good work Meissa.

On the topic "why"
Meissa is a great CSM member, and i'm sure he will remain there for at least few more terms. He is one of the most competent and intelligent EVE online players i know, always very helpful and patient on explaining any EVE related thing or situation due to large amounts of personal experience probably in all possible matters. Also, he always uses an objective point of view, avoiding any personal feelings of attachment to any kind of game features.

If there would be one person i could count on defending or representing my or peoples opinion - it is him.

Friends! Voting for Meissa we are closing to our bright feature of balanced and bug free EVE Online!
Seriously Cool

Trader Hansen
Failure Assured
Posted - 2011.03.21 00:31:00 - [43]
 

Thanks for the unsolicted eve-mails to 3 of my characters telling me I should vote for you. Be rest assured that if I want to participate in the travesty that is the CSM, I can do it under my own volition and suggest that you refrain from spamming peoples inboxes in a desperate attempt to get more votes.

Meissa Anunthiel
Redshift Industrial
Rooks and Kings
Posted - 2011.03.21 00:50:00 - [44]
 

Originally by: Trader Hansen
Thanks for the unsolicted eve-mails to 3 of my characters telling me I should vote for you. Be rest assured that if I want to participate in the travesty that is the CSM, I can do it under my own volition and suggest that you refrain from spamming peoples inboxes in a desperate attempt to get more votes.


I'm sorry you think the CSM to be a travesty, I suppose you don't appreciate the things it has brought you...
We unfortunately have few venues to reach out to people, and many people don't read the forums... Judging from the feedback I got, many of those found my mails useful, I'm sorry you didn't.

Arkanon Nerevar
Gallente
Posted - 2011.03.21 20:29:00 - [45]
 

I have a few questions regarding the changes you would support:
1. What specifics do you plan to address in regards to bringing Gallente in line with the other factions, do you support redoing hybrid turrets as a whole, alterations of ship stats and bonuses. Some have suggested a overhaul of armor tanking, what is your position on this subject.
2. Do you plan to support mission runners and any changes made to the mission/agent aspect of the game.
3. What is your position on faction warfare and lowsec.

thanks in advance

Meissa Anunthiel
Redshift Industrial
Rooks and Kings
Posted - 2011.03.21 21:15:00 - [46]
 

Originally by: Arkanon Nerevar
I have a few questions regarding the changes you would support:
1. What specifics do you plan to address in regards to bringing Gallente in line with the other factions, do you support redoing hybrid turrets as a whole, alterations of ship stats and bonuses. Some have suggested a overhaul of armor tanking, what is your position on this subject.
2. Do you plan to support mission runners and any changes made to the mission/agent aspect of the game.
3. What is your position on faction warfare and lowsec.

thanks in advance


The first thing is that Balance is not about making things equally useful in similar circumstances, but rather making sure nothing is so useful using anything else would be stupid. Also, always keeping in mind a boost to something is a nerf to something(s) else.
That said, Gallente hulls are, in my opinion, mostly fine. I love my myrmi, dominixes are great, etc. There's a few tweaks required on individual ship basis, but the same can be said of the other races too.

About hybrid turrets. There's lots of crap information into why hybrid turrets suck. The fact is, close range, they're great. When one needs to move between targets, they suck. They outdamage everyone else when they're in that sweet spot between not having enough tracking and being out of range. And there lies the rub. The distance at which they're at their peak has cliffs on each side, making them not really viable in a fleet situation, or even small gang situation where targets are not packed. So, I do support changes to hyrbid turrets, not a total change. I'd rather see the "sweet spot" at which they're great extended. And their range extended as well...

Overhaul of armor tanking. I'm unsure about that. There have been suggestions to change the way they work (more peak repair with less continuous and vice versa), I'm still unsure whether a change is needed, I like it as it is.

Do I plan to support mission runners? Sure! Why wouldn't I? But changes to missions have to be evaluated. There's different kinds of mission runners. There's the people who like the predictability of farming their well known L4 missions. Those could use more variety, but not necessarily more danger. Likewise for the adventurous, L5s don't live up to the expectations. They're harder, but equally boring. There needs to be extra content for both of those groups (and ffs not more mining missions :p)

Factional Warfare. Great idea, botched implementation. As things currently stands, it sucks donkey balls, and it needs a serious overhaul rather than the small patching that happens to fix the most glaring holes. Unfortunately with InCarna taking the resources, there's precious little left, and given that limitation, I can't in good conscience decide to devote the majority of those resource to FW. As far as lowsec goes, it needs a better risk/reward ratio. There's fights to be had, but the situation is far from ideal. Incursions may lead to more people here (I live in lowsec at the moment), but I'm doubtful about that, but there definitely needs more people. And maybe the way to have that is some form of risk mitigation rather than increase in rewards...

Hroya
Posted - 2011.03.22 01:49:00 - [47]
 

Hope you get elected and serious candidates like you with the best intentions for the game in mind and no personall agenda.


Contralto
Rift Tech
Posted - 2011.03.26 20:49:00 - [48]
 

Congratulations on getting through again, My 5 votes went your way :)

I appreciated you taking the time and effort to mail me and the offer of one to one any time. Shows initiative and commitment to the election.

Habaticus
Gallente
Posted - 2011.03.29 09:38:00 - [49]
 

Congratulations Meissa!

Your return is a ray of light to the few of us that enjoy the challenge of doing it the hard way on our own. I don't know if this is the CSM to be overly diplomatic with, but I trust your perception of the politics. This group may be a bit inclined to wheel and deal behind the scenes, so I ask you to be vigilant on the transpancy and openess of communications with the community.

Good luck on what I see as a very busy year for you.


Pages: 1 [2]

This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 


The new forums are live

Please adjust your bookmarks to https://forums.eveonline.com

These forums are archived and read-only