open All Channels
seplocked Jita Park Speakers Corner
blankseplocked [CSM6] They're lying to you.
 
This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 
Pages: first : previous : ... 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 12 13 14 ... : last (18)

Author Topic

digi
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
Posted - 2011.03.03 23:51:00 - [271]
 

Originally by: Lady Spanky
Originally by: Kalrand
Originally by: Harold Hammerstein

Question for you Mittani - who would you like to see on the CSM with you?



I believe he might just have a list.


I love all the political ignoramuses who think that a vote for Mittens is a vote against the 'system'. Really fills your heart with hope for the future of the world when people are that easily duped.




Would you like to tell us how the CSM came to its existence? Please detail the events leading up to the formation of the first CSM.

Seriouspost.

Golar Crexis
Posted - 2011.03.03 23:55:00 - [272]
 

Originally by: The Mittani
Originally by: Golar Crexis
I'm voting for Mittani as this is internet spaceships and whats the worst that can happen?

But one quick question for Mittani.
I have read a few of your TentonHammer articles and you assert dominion sov is broken.
Speaking as someone who has not really experienced sov battles or maintaining sov (except for a few weeks in (what was) Initiative space).
In what way is sov broken?


christ, don't even get me started. the dominion system was intended to have two halves to its features; the idea was that you would cut out the old pos-war mechanic with the ihub/tcu/sbu system on the one hand, and increase the population density of 0.0 with upgrades and an automated treaty system on the other. the treaty system was there to help larger alliances shelter and develop smaller alliances, either through rent or tribute or whatever. it had a locational standings system (blue in this constellation and this pipe, neutral elsewhere) as well as an automated payment collection setup. when dominion was released, the entire treaty feature was thrown into the gulag of the backlog, never to be seen again.

this meant that you had the 'solidify power' segments of dominion invoked - upgrades, sbu system, ihubs etc - without the mechanic to get new alliances started in nullsec. power has solidified and with the exception of BORT there's no real new blood in nullsec, it's just us same old grizzled great warriors hanging out on jabber pursuing ancient grudges. actually there's not even grudges to fuel us, it's a lot of HoN and LoL and WoT. :/

also, while i'm not a game designer and the CSM is explicitly not for game designer wannabes, people don't really enjoy the sov system much. alliances lose their sov when they cascade through other means, usually griefing, not because of heads-up conquest. that's because the structure shots are just so utterly boring ugh

in the pre-dominion system, goonswarm at its peak held 10 regions. even though pos-war was a pain, it was fairly entertaining and you could enjoy conquest for its own sake. in dominion there's not much impetus for serious conquest just because it's so boring. goonswarm holds one region, half of which is given to our allies at any given moment, plus some jump bridges down to fountain. we have a 'tight' sov footprint, and while that's probably better for the game than us owning half the galaxy like we used to, it's highly unlikely that we'll lose deklein, ever.

also, supercapitals should die a lot more. death to supercapitals. they enhance the 'dominion sucks' experience and they have a tremendous lag-wake due to fighterbombers and god knows what else. ugh.

:words:


Thanks for the reply.
Best of luck with helping to *fix* eve

Golar Crexis
Posted - 2011.03.03 23:59:00 - [273]
 

Originally by: General Windypops
Originally by: Harold Hammerstein
The Mittani has my vote.

none of these internet space-ship pixels are real, it's a game. games are about fun. this dude makes me laugh. YARRRR!! players is what makes this game fun. Clicking on a target and pressing "F1" and waiting till it asplodes - is like microwaving baked potatoes - boring... This guy adds tin-foil.

Question for you Mittani - who would you like to see on the CSM with you?






I'm glad he "makes you laugh". You should already know the people he wants to be on the CSM with him as he's orchestrated the whole block voting process with them already ya big dufus!

Enjoy your 'freedom'. Such a rebel!





Dude its a GAME 0_0

fake edit: double posting like a boss

Skunk Gracklaw
Caldari
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
Posted - 2011.03.04 01:14:00 - [274]
 

Originally by: General Windypops
I'm glad he "makes you laugh". You should already know the people he wants to be on the CSM with him as he's orchestrated the whole block voting process with them already ya big dufus!

Enjoy your 'freedom'. Such a rebel!


If it keeps bad posters like you off the CSM I am all for bloc voting hijinks.

Tango Zulu
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
Posted - 2011.03.04 01:42:00 - [275]
 

Originally by: Scanner717
I support not only the removal of Jump Bridges but I will go you one farther and ask that POS's have their reinforce timer shorted to 2 hour maximum. Because this crap with infinite isk streaming out of a dead weight brainless structures is killing any hope of warfare by attrition. Botting is a no brainer, KILL IT. I refuse to believe that none of the technology used by other MMO's to track and prevent alterations to game client cannot be used in eve. Mittani is not interested in changing a thing, even though a causal observer can look at the server killing Supercap fights and the real world problems associated with alarm clock ops, people told to skip work and school to be present to shoot pixels is obscene, and run screaming. voting for carebears, and by that I mean people casual minded is absolutely a better choice because hardcores :read mittani: want the bar of entry to match their current play schedule and have all else treading water. This simply put is why no Sov holding allaince can hold anything without forming a multi alliance power bloc. Look out at the map how much has actually changed hands in a years time, and how did it really change, was it by actual war or did most of the sov change hands because the sitting defender splintered? Has eve gotten more interesting or has null cooled to the most stable state it has ever been.


Moon income at the highest level is for corporation/alliance costs. Anyone making huge (personal tech moons) profit off of it is a leech. Ours are used for subsidies, sov costs, infrastructure, and reimbursements.

Botting does need to die. But as noted earlier, CCP has to fry the bigger fish (RMTers) before they can Unholy Rage Mk. II the smaller guy botting for his PLEXes. Because, while all botters are lazy, RMTers are actually stealing money from CCPs pocket. And at the bottom of it all, CCP is still a business.

Who said Mittani favored Supercapital fights, especially those of the server killing kind? He Multiboxes drakes and Maelstroms on fleet fights, and gets an erection about HIS SABRE in small-gang stuff. Everyone wants supercapitals nerfed, because everyone agrees it's killing 0.0 pvp.

Also, no one in my years here has been told to skip work or school. Many people have done so, and have been called (and I quote) "F***ing idiots," and on occasion, "Worse than ******."

The map's changed a lot, this is bad? (there was much laughter when we lost Delve to our own incompetence)

And (pretty much exactly for the reasons laid out in Mittani's latest TTH.com post) yes it is the most stagnant in our recallable history. *Because a big war was just won. A feud that has lasted years is decided.* And by most stagnant I mean NC is fighting on the drone border, and DC is skirmishing/outright fighting Evzeroke. So most stagnant = wars still happening, which invalidates the point I figure you were trying to make.

Rebalance supercaps and remap sovereignty to two-three years ago, this'd still be the most interesting time in EVE to play. (Maybe rollback Dominion sov mechanics too. Smile)

William Loire
State War Academy
Posted - 2011.03.04 01:49:00 - [276]
 

Edited by: William Loire on 04/03/2011 01:57:49
I wonder how Mittens feels about the 0.0 logisitics...

Awesome Possum
Original Sin.
PURPLE HELMETED WARRIORS
Posted - 2011.03.04 02:14:00 - [277]
 

Originally by: Lady Spanky
Originally by: Kalrand
Originally by: Harold Hammerstein

Question for you Mittani - who would you like to see on the CSM with you?



I believe he might just have a list.


I love all the political ignoramuses who think that a vote for Mittens is a vote against the 'system'. Really fills your heart with hope for the future of the world when people are that easily duped.




You're not Spank and you never will be.

Tango Zulu
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
Posted - 2011.03.04 04:14:00 - [278]
 

Originally by: Andrea Griffin
How exactly do you plan to do this? The CSM has zero power. CCP can abolish it on a whim. CCP doesn't answer to the CSM, it's the other way around.



If I may, as Mittani's response didn't include this, albeit I think his campaign understands these facts:

As a business, CCP takes stock in public opinion of them. If the player base feels like they're being ignored, they'll become discontented, and if actively rejected, upset. When an idea is brought forward initially, it starts as "I think this is a good idea." Those ideas then build evidence and are presented as a cause to the government (in this case CCP Devs). If the cause has a large part of the populace affected by it, then the supreme authority of the standing government should take notice and make a motion to edit it for the sake of public opinion. (In real life, for votes to get re-elected, in here, with our wallets)

So:
-If the CSM is listened to by CCP peacefully, then it's doing its job as described. *This is desired.*

-If the CSM only agrees with CCP, or disagrees with CCP but doesn't raise some hell, public opinion is at best irrelevant. Discontent increases.

-If the CSM is not being listened to by CCP and raises some hell, and it fixes something that many people need (not just a corporation or alliance, but the entirety of 0.0, or lowsec, or highsec), then it's evolving into an effective interface between the players, and the people who design what is played.

-Lastly, (and here's where a hardline maneuver comes in handy if the upvoted backlog expands as hundreds of things tens of thousands of people approve of fall into development hell, while new and shiny with poor support structure underneath continue showing up) If the CSM is being ignored, pressures CCP, and CCP pulls the plug, it shows that we're being ignored and this is just a political bluff to make us fat, dumb, and happy.

All these :words: to say: When pandering to our desire to feel important, we may get comfortable with the position of the CSM. Even if CCP contemplates only one in every twenty ideas, and utilizes one in a hundred, they can hide behind minor successes. The CSM *needs* to be a driving force, and if CCP cuts them off it'll do more harm than good for them. We need a powerful leader for the CSM, and a powerful enough figure to garner the following to get there.

/longpost

Mepost: It may be my being American, but when there's problems that are allowed to sit while the government tries new failed experiments, it's my civic duty to complain (Madison's 1st amendment, speech and assembly clauses) and resist (Jefferson's belief in frequent political revolutions) rather than roll over. Key example: jumpbridges, if the silly notion of removing(or sharply nerfing) actually is being contemplated, HELL YEAH IT NEEDS TO BE ADDRESSED. That would do terrible things to the 0.0 playerbase across the board, which would cause quitting, which would hurt CCP's bottom line, which would reduce their budget to give us what we want as players everywhere. A decision by people who don't use them, hurting people who do, needs a strong force to undo the damage before it's put in place.

That's what I want in CSM6, and that's why Mittani has my vote.


Tl;dr: CCP needs apply community-wide approved CSM ideas with more zeal rather than bucketing them. If they don't it'll suck for them. Mittani has a track record of getting s*** done. I am the GSF and I vote.

The Mittani
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
Posted - 2011.03.04 08:40:00 - [279]
 

Originally by: Rhedea

Do you believe that forming an coalition between alliances be like a wardec and be paid for. I've read posts on this subject and was wondering if you had any thoughts on this.

I like to see more work done on the UI HUD. PI and the bounty system. Keep up with the bug fixes and lag issues.



You can't really enforce an external, game-mechanic based fix on what are ultimately social bonds between players. You can try, but it'll just be worked around via jabber, IRC, fleets in different areas or any number of cunning ways. You can't force people to be friends any more than you can force them to /not/ be friends; diplomacy has always been a weapon in this game that some master (usually blocs), and some complain about (usually 'elite pvp', no-standings entities who end up losing to blocs).

While I don't think that I'd be in a position to ram through anything involving UI (since that's not what the CSM does, sadly), my personal take on the UI issue is that CCP should, in an ideal world, open up UI programming just like Blizzard has in WoW. The WoW UI has incorporated a whole slew of player-designed mods over the years, which has made the UI ever better. By contrast, the EVE UI is a dog's breakfast, a goddamned spreadsheet in space. Ugh.

I think PI is boring as hell. I have a couple of PI alts. I tried it. I have no idea how it's going to work with DUST. Does anyone even mention DUST anymore? Heh. I had hopes it would be a cool minigame, or develop into one. It's not right now, it's tedious crap. Better than ratting though!

The Mittani
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
Posted - 2011.03.04 08:47:00 - [280]
 

Edited by: The Mittani on 04/03/2011 08:47:35
Originally by: Harold Hammerstein
The Mittani has my vote.


Question for you Mittani - who would you like to see on the CSM with you?



Vile Rat, obviously. I could have kept the 'official GSF vote' all to myself, but VR works for the State Department and is a political genius, as anyone who's dealt with him ingame would know. He is the good cop to my bad cop, and we've done a lot together over the years.

Seleene and I get along famously, even though we're technically hostile to each other at the moment; he also knows the ins and outs of how CCP works better than anyone else who will be on the CSM, which is going to be key if my Unpleasant Hunch - that the rot lies within the lack of best practices in CCP itself - turns out to be more than a hunch.

I'll be pretty happy with the usual suspects who I suspect will get in. I'm not sure how the Russian vote is going to line up, since I can't read the language; we'll either have Krutoj or Death or possibly both. The NC will vote in at least one guy, assuming they don't vote-split into a billion shards. I expect TEST to come out strong for White Tree.

In sum, I'm not too worried about it. I think that I'll be able to work with just about anyone, especially since my campaign message has essentially been agreed to by just about every other candidate w/r/t the CSM needing to be a more powerful, effective advocate and for the backlog to be addressed. I'm saying the sky is blue, it's hard to argue with that.

Mara Rinn
Posted - 2011.03.04 10:39:00 - [281]
 

Originally by: The Mittani
... if my Unpleasant Hunch - that the rot lies within the lack of best practices in CCP itself - turns out to be more than a hunch.


The "year of excellence" with the HTFU video, the "switching to SCRUM" the "X wrote this and nobody else dares touch that code" - these issues raise such a stench of code smell that I don't even have to be on the same side of the planet to smell it.

I'd love to work with CCP, even if it's only so I can unravel the POS code and put them on the path to resurrecting The Dead Horse. Who knows, maybe at FanFest I'll get a CCP HR person drunk enough that they offer me a job.

In the meantime, good luck with getting all the NC to vote for the candidate they're supposed to. I look forward to seeing Goons see just how good they can make this game before they get around to screwing it up :)

GOTCH
Posted - 2011.03.04 13:35:00 - [282]
 

Well here goes,first off let me say im no fan of the Goons,in fact if i said i think their lower than a rattlesnakes belly in a wagon rut,it would be being generous.That said i find myself agreing(jeez whats the universe coming to)with Mittansboy.CCP have forgoten the number one rule of retail,the customer is always right(even when their wrong).They dont give a monkeys ass about our views,anyone who has ever submitted a pettition knows this.The only way they will sit up and listen is if we all stopped paying.Unfortunatly there is a sizable group within eve,who think CCP can do no wrong.You only had to read the gushing,vomit inducing forums when the game went down for a day a little while back.Guys they gave you a few skill points,not a fully fitted wyvern.The next best thing is someone on the council who will annoy the devs.So vote for The Mittani,even if he turns out to be full of ****,you know where you stand with a Goon.And as he says,he is a ruthless,devious bastard.You know you get with him exactly what it says on the tin,so good luck,but methinks CCP will block your attempt at being chair.

Tango Zulu
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
Posted - 2011.03.04 16:36:00 - [283]
 

Edited by: Tango Zulu on 04/03/2011 16:39:44
^^ I actually twitched trying to read that. He's right, but needs to resurrect his spacebar in some arcane ritual. It's in its death spasms.

Cearain
Caldari
The IMPERIUM of LaZy NATION
Posted - 2011.03.04 17:34:00 - [284]
 

Edited by: Cearain on 04/03/2011 18:01:01
Originally by: The Mittani
Edited by: The Mittani on 04/03/2011 08:47:35
Originally by: Harold Hammerstein
The Mittani has my vote.


Question for you Mittani - who would you like to see on the CSM with you?



In sum, I'm not too worried about it. I think that I'll be able to work with just about anyone, especially since my campaign message has essentially been agreed to by just about every other candidate w/r/t the CSM needing to be a more powerful, effective advocate and for the backlog to be addressed. I'm saying the sky is blue, it's hard to argue with that.


I read the subject of your message as saying the other candidates are lying to the players. Has the message changed? Or do the current crop of candidates agree that they are lying to the players? Or is there some other “they” that is doing the lying?

Do you think anyone running again from csm 5 will win? If so how do you think they will feel about you calling them “the current crop of idiots”?

Do you think you will be able to manipulate them like your goons who -you claim - would give you all of their votes if you didn’t allow vile rat to run?

OhThis GuyAgain
Posted - 2011.03.04 17:48:00 - [285]
 

Originally by: Cearain
Do you think anyone running again from csm 6 will win?

Huh?

Cearain
Caldari
The IMPERIUM of LaZy NATION
Posted - 2011.03.04 18:02:00 - [286]
 

Originally by: OhThis GuyAgain
Originally by: Cearain
Do you think anyone running again from csm 6 will win?

Huh?


Thank you. I have edited the original post.

Ladie Scarlet
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
Posted - 2011.03.04 20:18:00 - [287]
 

Originally by: GOTCH
Well here goes,first off let me say im no fan of the Goons,in fact if i said i think their lower than a rattlesnakes belly in a wagon rut,it would be being generous.That said i find myself agreing(jeez whats the universe coming to)with Mittansboy.CCP have forgoten the number one rule of retail,the customer is always right(even when their wrong).They dont give a monkeys ass about our views,anyone who has ever submitted a pettition knows this.The only way they will sit up and listen is if we all stopped paying.Unfortunatly there is a sizable group within eve,who think CCP can do no wrong.You only had to read the gushing,vomit inducing forums when the game went down for a day a little while back.Guys they gave you a few skill points,not a fully fitted wyvern.The next best thing is someone on the council who will annoy the devs.So vote for The Mittani,even if he turns out to be full of ****,you know where you stand with a Goon.And as he says,he is a ruthless,devious bastard.You know you get with him exactly what it says on the tin,so good luck,but methinks CCP will block your attempt at being chair.


What do you have against your spacebar?

Widemouth Deepthroat
Posted - 2011.03.04 22:41:00 - [288]
 

Every year someone is going to change CSM. Just more smoke going up the buthole but nothing actually happens. I think this has more to do with the Goons being preemptively buthurt about proposed 0.0 changes.

Rhes
Minmatar
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
Posted - 2011.03.04 23:59:00 - [289]
 

Originally by: Widemouth Deepthroat
Every year someone is going to change CSM. Just more smoke going up the buthole but nothing actually happens. I think this has more to do with the Goons being preemptively buthurt about proposed 0.0 changes.

More that when CCP proposed drastic changes to 0.0 nobody on the current CSM said anything about it.

There's nothing wrong with getting people elected to the CSM that actually live in nullsec to give feedback on nullsec changes.

Hrothgar Doran
Posted - 2011.03.05 11:38:00 - [290]
 

Mittani, I have a question. Do you think that CSM should have a veto on some/most/all of CCP's actions/buffs/nerfs/features, etc?

I'm not sure if this has been posted before, but 10 pages is quite a bit to scan. Apoligies in advance to those who allready asked this or something similiar.

Malcanis
Caldari
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
Posted - 2011.03.05 11:57:00 - [291]
 

I have a question for mittens!

Assuming the vote fairy woke up in bed next to you one Sunday morning and promised you a wish in return for not saying anything to her boyfriend, who, out of the announced candidates, would comprise your "ideal result" CSM?

1: The Mittani as Chair (obviously)
2: Vile Rat?
3:?
4:?
5:?
6:?
7:?
8:?
9:?

Harvey Skywarker
Higher Than Everest
Posted - 2011.03.05 15:27:00 - [292]
 

Obvious, OP is a knob, is obvious.

Isonda
Gallente
Okkelen Grave Robbers
Posted - 2011.03.05 15:55:00 - [293]
 

I support this labor union.
Unions makes the workers strong.

erohW gaB
Posted - 2011.03.05 16:18:00 - [294]
 

Anyone with The in their name is..........

whaynethepain
Dissident Aggressors
Mordus Angels
Posted - 2011.03.05 16:36:00 - [295]
 

"What I Can Offer You:

The raw, ugly truth. No pretty illusions. No false promises."

I'm going to quote you on that.

The biggest words I know are swear words, I know something is developing in Eve, because I'm downloading a patch.

All I want is a simple warnings of new developments that may spoil my Eve Online gaming rituals. Or I will ragequit Eve.

The other csm's seem to be speculating future depelopments in Eve as if it was their idea, close as they may become, and little as they effect the outcome, I still find this an insult.

Your my only hope.


FinnAgain Zero
Roving Guns Inc.
RAZOR Alliance
Posted - 2011.03.05 16:39:00 - [296]
 

Originally by: whaynethepain

Your



"You're"

Ace Secunda
AQUILA INC
Posted - 2011.03.05 17:00:00 - [297]
 

So, long story short.....

CCP pitch ideas to CSM, CSM gives feedback, CCP decides whether to listen or not and still does as it wants?

To be honest, I don't notice half the bugs people whine about, I'm too busy enjoying making people explode (or exploding myself), do we need CSM, maybe, maybe not. I, like 80% of other people, probably wont even vote and will we notice anything that has come about from CSM interaction, probably not :D

As long as I'm still able to lock and start shooting I'm happy.......

Veranius
Sigillum Militum Xpisti
Fatal Ascension
Posted - 2011.03.05 17:33:00 - [298]
 

Edited by: Veranius on 05/03/2011 17:38:58
I too once thought The Mittani was smug, foul mouthed scamming ***got like most of eve believes the rest of goons to be. Why? Because I had never actually talked/heard him talk and had only read his smug posts on Kugu. After joining the CFC and listening to his last, silver tongued "State of Te Goonion" speech I realized my impression was obviously wrong and that the impression I got from the rest of eve was wrong.

Mayhaps, dear reader, you too have heard such rumors?

And two things to all the dudes hurf blurfing about jump bridges

1) They are not 100% safe and can be camped effectively with as little as 5 ships, a solid knowledge of game mechanics and patience/intel.

2) If JBs are removed from the game/nerfed to hell and back then titans will become the new JBs. The need for more titans = more botting due to the astronomical cost of the ships. So p much a vote for JB nerf is an indirect vote for botting.


Mr LaForge
Posted - 2011.03.05 21:46:00 - [299]
 

Gonna vote for this guy. His opening post and comments sounded more honest than most stuff I read.

The Mittani
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
Posted - 2011.03.05 22:49:00 - [300]
 

Originally by: Hrothgar Doran
Mittani, I have a question. Do you think that CSM should have a veto on some/most/all of CCP's actions/buffs/nerfs/features, etc?

I'm not sure if this has been posted before, but 10 pages is quite a bit to scan. Apoligies in advance to those who allready asked this or something similiar.


It doesn't matter if I think they should have a veto or not, because they never will have a veto.

Half of being a good politician is knowing how to pick your battles. Incarna, for example, has millions of dollars of real-world cash invested in it. It's going to happen. Period; trying to stop it, thinking your group of nine player reps can somehow get in the way of that amount of already-sunk capital, is a waste of effort.

You might be able to offer input and feedback to tweak it or improve it.

Originally by: Malcanis
I have a question for mittens!

Assuming the vote fairy woke up in bed next to you one Sunday morning and promised you a wish in return for not saying anything to her boyfriend, who, out of the announced candidates, would comprise your "ideal result" CSM?

1: The Mittani as Chair (obviously)
2: Vile Rat?
3:?


The actual rankings don't matter. Obviously I want the Chair, but if I wanted the chair over ABSOLUTELY EVERYTHING ELSE I wouldn't vote-split the GSF bloc with Vile Rat. So clearly having VR on the CSM is more important to me than the Chair slot itself. The chair will be a helpful tool if I can get it, though; it shows a mandate, and implies power (even if the actual listed powers of the Chair are minimal).

I want solid and capable people on the CSM who aren't sperglords with no understanding of politics. The sort of person who'll try to 'Stop Incarna' or drone on about trivial bull**** for hours isn't going to help anything. Seleene knows his ****, Death and Krutoj know their ****. White Tree is solid.

I personally think that Meissa owns, having hung out with him at the 09 Fanfest. I think my platform annoys the **** out of him, but if you're a diehard '**** nullsec, **** the mittani' kind of voter, I'd point to Meissa as a sensible, intelligent non-nullsec voice.

Originally by: whaynethepain

All I want is a simple warnings of new developments that may spoil my Eve Online gaming rituals. Or I will ragequit Eve.

The other csm's seem to be speculating future depelopments in Eve as if it was their idea, close as they may become, and little as they effect the outcome, I still find this an insult.

Your my only hope.



I can communicate whatever isn't covered by the NDA. Making sure that news from the CSM actually gets read by the rest of EVE will be a priority.

Originally by: Veranius

I too once thought The Mittani was smug, foul mouthed scamming ***got like most of eve believes the rest of goons to be. Why? Because I had never actually talked/heard him talk and had only read his smug posts on Kugu. After joining the CFC and listening to his last, silver tongued "State of Te Goonion" speech I realized my impression was obviously wrong and that the impression I got from the rest of eve was wrong.

Mayhaps, dear reader, you too have heard such rumors?



I am, in truth, a smug, foul-mouthed scamming ***got. I just happen to have a silver tongue and a gift for politics.


Pages: first : previous : ... 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 12 13 14 ... : last (18)

This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 


The new forums are live

Please adjust your bookmarks to https://forums.eveonline.com

These forums are archived and read-only