open All Channels
seplocked Jita Park Speakers Corner
blankseplocked [CSM6] Prometheus Exenthal
 
This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]

Author Topic

Rikki Sals
Caldari
Posted - 2011.03.12 01:32:00 - [91]
 

EVE is one of the most interesting games around. But is it also BADASS?! The answer is yes. And it can be more so. Prometheus knows - watch his vids. He's got my vote. Cool

CHED
Genos Occidere
Pandemic Legion
Posted - 2011.03.12 13:44:00 - [92]
 

Good luck Prom

Mickey Simon
Genos Occidere
Posted - 2011.03.13 03:17:00 - [93]
 

Well I've voted with my 2 accounts.
Good luck!

Suitonia
Gallente
Genos Occidere
HYDRA RELOADED
Posted - 2011.03.13 20:12:00 - [94]
 

May a thousand Falcon alts spontaneously combust.

Cearain
Caldari
The IMPERIUM of LaZy NATION
Posted - 2011.03.14 14:31:00 - [95]
 

Originally by: Mynxee
Good luck, Prom.

If you do get elected, your only real opportunity to put your issues on the table for transparent and "official" discussion with CCP will be in Summit sessions related to those issues. Since the CSM (at least during CSM5) drives the Summit agenda for the most part (assuming they don't just passively let CCP do that), you should be able to request a session or two be added to the agenda related to your interests. Same as I did with Low Sec back in June. Assuming of course that CSM6 operates in the same democratic manner regarding Summit planning that CSM5 did.



It would be great to have a summit explaining why solo and small scale pvp is a great part of eve and encouraging ccp to recognize that fact and keep that in mind when they discuss game mechanics.

Scheulagh Santorine
Origin.
Posted - 2011.03.15 04:37:00 - [96]
 

Yo, Santorine checking in...

Vote for Prom.

I'm serious. Unlike a lot of the other candidates who spend their time spying on each other, metagaming, and calling each other the n-word in local, Prometheus is the real deal. He's a true soloist. He understands the game deeply. Most importantly, he understands what things in EVE need to change and what things should not be changed. He's the voice that small-gang and PVP-focused players need on the CSM.

Don't delay. Vote Prom today.

S.Santorine
Black Legion
Math Department


Helena Andresen
Transfixion
Posted - 2011.03.15 23:43:00 - [97]
 

Good luck!

Cloudy Skys
SniggWaffe
Posted - 2011.03.16 00:53:00 - [98]
 

PROM4CSM, good luck m8 B)

Tehg Rhind
Posted - 2011.03.16 02:27:00 - [99]
 

Got 1 of my 2 votes. I am a huge supporter of CSM members who know how to fly.

Joan Avon
Amarr
We See Dead People
Atlas.
Posted - 2011.03.18 20:57:00 - [100]
 

You got both of my votes. Best of luck!

Prometheus Exenthal
Genos Occidere
Posted - 2011.03.20 21:20:00 - [101]
 

I appreciate the support of those who have voted thus far.
I'm sincerely hoping that people are actually thinking for themselves rather than bloc voting and/or having their votes bought.

Those need to keep in mind that the only incentive needed for your vote should be your desire for a better game.
The potential for a fatter wallet now simply means you'll pay for it later.

Have a great weekend! Smile

Jared D'Uroth
Minmatar
ElitistOps
Pandemic Legion
Posted - 2011.03.21 06:14:00 - [102]
 

+2 fanboy votes

Azishkra'elhykai Mizamel
Minmatar
Undead Stuffed Bunnies
HYDRA RELOADED
Posted - 2011.03.21 08:20:00 - [103]
 

Hey Prom, I've got a few last minute questions for you.

There are a lot of voices out there all with differing opinions. How would you attempt to come to a middle-ground/agreement with them in regards to ship rebalancing?

With your push to improve the grossly-underwhelming T2 frigates and command ships in view of small gang warfare/soloing, what other potential ship improvements/rebalancing would you suggest that would support/be good in both small and large fleet formats?

What are your thoughts on keeping small fleets still relevant, yet maintaining large fleet power, and where would you start (might be a repeat question from above)?

I know you have been grilled about lowsec. As a player who has some mildly horrified interest in the area, I'd like to know if you would, and how would you, improve upon the mechanics already in place in lowsec? What would you add or change?

What are your thoughts on highsec and wormholes, and what suggestions you make miniprofessions such as ninja salvaging and exploration more relevant to gameplay?

Am I even allowed to ask these questions?

Prometheus Exenthal
Genos Occidere
Posted - 2011.03.21 22:40:00 - [104]
 

Originally by: Azishkra'elhykai Mizamel
There are a lot of voices out there all with differing opinions. How would you attempt to come to a middle-ground/agreement with them in regards to ship rebalancing?
I would start by looking at the overall picture. Sure some changes may sound cool and effective, but come testing they may prove to be overpowered or completely terrible (ie: 4-mid Deimos). Some ships may work well on their own, but as a fleet asset, totally useless or redundant. There are many things to look at when it comes to balancing, so I'm sorry I can't really give you a straight answer.

Originally by: Azishkra'elhykai Mizamel
With your push to improve the grossly-underwhelming T2 frigates and command ships in view of small gang warfare/soloing, what other potential ship improvements/rebalancing would you suggest that would support/be good in both small and large fleet formats?
Rebalancing can mean anything from lock times, ewar tweaking, gate sizes, to even sensor strength. This is a fairly broad question, but overall I'd like to see CCP focus more on a players ability to be effective, rather than simply adding more people to the mix.

Originally by: Azishkra'elhykai Mizamel
What are your thoughts on keeping small fleets still relevant, yet maintaining large fleet power, and where would you start (might be a repeat question from above)?
Smaller fleets shouldn't be considered dead simply because they are outnumbered. Once again, I'd like to see individual skill being more effective than simply having more people. I have some ideas regarding this, but nothing so fleshed out that I'd be willing to discuss them as part of a platform.

Originally by: Azishkra'elhykai Mizamel
I know you have been grilled about lowsec. As a player who has some mildly horrified interest in the area, I'd like to know if you would, and how would you, improve upon the mechanics already in place in lowsec? What would you add or change?
I think it's a safe bet to say that increasing the value of low-sec space is as simple as moving most (if not all) of the very well paying missions there. It may end up promoting teamwork among mission runners, and perhaps even result in missions fits turning into pvp fits and the like. On the other hand, things such as neutral and pirate remote rep should be looked at. For example; it makes no sense for a pirate to get a gcc for repairing another pirate who doesnt have gcc. Just my thoughts, I'm not the authority on low-sec.

Originally by: Azishkra'elhykai Mizamel
What are your thoughts on highsec and wormholes, and what suggestions you make miniprofessions such as ninja salvaging and exploration more relevant to gameplay?
I feel like high-sec has become a bit too much of a safe haven. Many will tell you it's far to easy to make a ton of money doing low-risk missions, and it isn't really worth the effort stepping into more dangerous space. I partly agree.
Exploration and Ninja-Salavaging have been / are in the process of being looked at by CCP iirc. The new salvaging ships are a great example, as well as the refurbishing and addition of new 00 complexes. As for wormholes, my experience is limited to the first few weeks of it. I don't have any input on them.

Originally by: Azishkra'elhykai Mizamel
Am I even allowed to ask these questions?
Probably not, but we have freedom of speech in Canada Razz

Raimo
Genos Occidere
HYDRA RELOADED
Posted - 2011.03.26 16:09:00 - [105]
 

Edited by: Raimo on 26/03/2011 16:10:12

Grats on the alt spot. Hopefully you'll end up being able to use it.

MrRommel
Posted - 2011.03.30 17:15:00 - [106]
 

you had all my three votes !
thought you should've been Nr 1

shame still hope you can get something done in the alternate spot
i fully support your look on game improvement and realy think CCP should work
this game out before destroying it's great potential !


Pages: 1 2 3 [4]

This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 


The new forums are live

Please adjust your bookmarks to https://forums.eveonline.com

These forums are archived and read-only