open All Channels
seplocked EVE Information Portal
blankseplocked EVE Online: Incursion 1.1.2 Feedback
 
This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5

Author Topic

JCache
Caldari
Posted - 2011.01.27 15:32:00 - [31]
 

Originally by: Stormchyld
<< I agree.... there's no nudity shown so what's the problem?

No nudity... well, there's your problem. Rolling Eyes

dhunpael
Caldari
Narwhals Ate My Duck
Posted - 2011.01.27 15:34:00 - [32]
 

Originally by: Swynet
Originally by: turbine2
We gotta wear shirts? Aw man.

It'll be ties next.


I prefer rails/blasters adn wallente ships fixed than T-shirts we're ok on that one but, c'mon people it's aspace ship game, who cares of your char bobies or pects?
Cool

It's time to grow up now Laughing



If you watch close to the picture of the prostitutes ingame =>they have no shirt, can you please fix this to CCP?

Come one grow up.

This is a game played and build for adults, i'm sure it won't end in an orgy...

neutrinone
Posted - 2011.01.27 15:41:00 - [33]
 

Something wrong with planetary system since this patch. My links need to be upgrade now for low capacity used... I guess the decimal generat a bug.

RealmofDorkness
Amarr
Pulse Industries
Posted - 2011.01.27 15:48:00 - [34]
 

but...but that was why I named my Retriever 'Golden'. Sad

Nirnias Stirrum
Posted - 2011.01.27 15:53:00 - [35]
 

Edited by: Nirnias Stirrum on 27/01/2011 15:54:03
Yeh i had to rename mine from Golden Retriever to, Brown/GoldenRetriever.... its just not the same :( That said it now looks way better, not like a tonka toy anymore.

2 things that are REALLY bugging me is neutrals no longer showing up as flashy = sign with a gray background! FIX THIS, this is essential!

And the second is the docking bug in D2-HOS station! I log in,warp to POS and warp back to station and it says docking requested! then NOTHING happens! Despite 2 petitions, and 2 log files submitted to the bugs report. This still has not been fixed!

Stormchyld
Minmatar
Posted - 2011.01.27 15:59:00 - [36]
 

<clipped for length

If you watch close to the picture of the prostitutes ingame =>they have no shirt, can you please fix this to CCP?

Come one grow up.

This is a game played and build for adults, i'm sure it won't end in an orgy...


<< aye... after having 2 of those worst looking toons in eve they look decent now. has CCP ever looked at some of the character names that people come up with? puhlease..... where does it end? free the twins!! ;)

Gischuchwipall
Posted - 2011.01.27 16:00:00 - [37]
 

colorless neuts is a real pain in the butt for us that live in null.. change it back

Tizona
Gallente
Posted - 2011.01.27 16:04:00 - [38]
 

I created an overview tab specifically for war targets.

all i have selected for states is:

pilot has terrible standing
pilot is an outlaw
pilot is at war with your corporation/alliance.

funny... no flashy red shows up AT ALL in my overview.


Sabr Sheppard
Gallente
Brotherhood of Redemption
Seven Seas Alliance
Posted - 2011.01.27 16:12:00 - [39]
 

Originally by: Tizona
I created an overview tab specifically for war targets.

all i have selected for states is:

pilot has terrible standing
pilot is an outlaw
pilot is at war with your corporation/alliance.

funny... no flashy red shows up AT ALL in my overview.



Thats because as far as I can tell the overview uses AND operands instead of OR. Thus if a pilot has a sec status of 5.0 and is at war with your corp / alliance, those settings will not show the war target. The only way I've been able to work around this is by showing everyone. Also it's impossible to make an overview that shows fleet members as well. Banged my head quite a few times as I was looking at all the right settings and it not working.

Crazy Dave
Caldari
SCAVENGERS
Posted - 2011.01.27 16:25:00 - [40]
 

Edited by: Crazy Dave on 27/01/2011 16:54:11
Since my map isn't showing me where the incursions are at. I took a gamble and went to Deltole since it was rumored that an incursion was taking place there. Since I had no idea (aside from the patch notes and videos) what to really expect first hand. So I took off in my Minmatar attack shuttle (rare item of the imagination) and went to observe the incursion. When I arrived there I spent about 20 min watching a hoard of players attack this one shansha cruiser. They were using about 50 drones and every manner of weapons you can use in a high sec system. Guess what? Go on guess.... The shansha was able to completely absorb the damage. Its shields did not go below the 80% mark before they shot back up to 100%. Eventually though after about an hour of watching it and more ships showed up. The cruiser got popped. But far more player ships got converted in to artichoke looking capsules. Fortunately my attack shuttle wasn't targeted or attacked.

I started to look over the structures that were there and reading the info. The centralized structure was an automated shansha ship repair facility designed to, you guessed it, repair the shansha ships being attacked. After what I saw it was a very effective structure. Surrounding the repair structure I saw several other logistical support structures which according to the notes are used as IFF beacons for the repair facility so it can ID the proper ships to fix. They are also able to be hacked. Something no one was doing. Everyone was focused on assault and the unconscious desire to lose their expensive ships to pay attention to the structures. I wonder if hacking in to those logistical support structures might weaken the shansha enough to repel the incursion. Going by the common sense approach, if those are disabled then perhaps the shansha would lose the ability to nerf all the ships and gadgets in the affected system. But I'm not sure if that is the case. Might work might not. Something big has to be active to generate a field that can affect an entire system. If not, then perhaps CCP can work that in to the scenario. What ever the case. I do believe that those logistical posts are the key to repelling the shansha. Otherwise I think they are a bit on the too strong side for smaller corps to want to deal with.

Also the re/blue status line. Needs to be adjusted. IMHO the recovery time is way to fast for the shansha. As they are the invaders waring in a system that is occupied by others. If anything the blue line should be faster to recovery than the red. The shansha need to ferry in logistics not the other way around. stationing logistics takes time. The defenders have logistical support in the form of their corp's and stations.

After watching the battle and making my observations I went to the belts in that system to check things out. I found two shansha ships there in VI-2, or was it IV-2...Anyways While there they quickly took my attack shuttle (again a rare item of the imagination) So I ended up returning to (censored) in my brand new ibis and 1 unit of trit. You think with cost of living they would provide 2 units of trit.

Just my two bits worth.Cool
BTW These observations were made before last nights D/T. So don't panic about the comment made about the map CCP.

Christopher AET
Segmentum Solar
Posted - 2011.01.27 16:27:00 - [41]
 

Make-up for male characters. Particularly the Gallente as the backstory would support this as they are a permissive society.

Aargolos
Minmatar
Estrale Frontiers
Posted - 2011.01.27 16:27:00 - [42]
 

One small quip: CTRL-Q to quit.

I just want to quit, I DO NOT want to go back to the login screen. Thanks.

Annasophia Smith
Posted - 2011.01.27 16:28:00 - [43]
 

Originally by: JCache
Originally by: Stormchyld
<< I agree.... there's no nudity shown so what's the problem?

No nudity... well, there's your problem. Rolling Eyes


Eve should be clothing optional Very Happy

Toros Okamura
Posted - 2011.01.27 16:29:00 - [44]
 

Originally by: Sabr Sheppard

Thats because as far as I can tell the overview uses AND operands instead of OR. Thus if a pilot has a sec status of 5.0 and is at war with your corp / alliance, those settings will not show the war target..


Yep, they should fix this instead of messing around with neutral standings. Who needs a "no standing"-setting anyway?

Annasophia Smith
Posted - 2011.01.27 16:33:00 - [45]
 

Originally by: Aargolos
One small quip: CTRL-Q to quit.

I just want to quit, I DO NOT want to go back to the login screen. Thanks.


Play in fixed window mode and then when you are ready to quit. Just go to the task bar, right click and select end. The window can be adjusted to any size just like any other windows window. Click and drag...hope this helps

Crazy Dave
Caldari
SCAVENGERS
Posted - 2011.01.27 16:37:00 - [46]
 

I have to agree. about the whole nudity issue. If you cant have it clothing optional, then at least provide the women with G string clothing as an option. Laughing

Farrah Contractor
Posted - 2011.01.27 16:40:00 - [47]
 

Originally by: Annasophia Smith
Originally by: JCache
Originally by: Stormchyld
<< I agree.... there's no nudity shown so what's the problem?

No nudity... well, there's your problem. Rolling Eyes


Eve should be clothing optional Very Happy



Eve is clothing optional. Ever think what everyone else in fleet is actually wearing on the other side of that screen? Beggars the imagination, doesn't it?

Alexis Reah
Posted - 2011.01.27 16:40:00 - [48]
 

1) When I heard they were fixing the Neutral standing "bug" I got excited...little did I know they were intentionally screwing it up!

2) Too bad the Retrievers aren't golden anymore.

3) Why are we now suddenly worried about showing a little bit of skin? Whenever I'm podded my body is naked in space for everyone to see!

...Just saying.

Stormchyld
Minmatar
Posted - 2011.01.27 16:42:00 - [49]
 

Edited by: Stormchyld on 27/01/2011 16:44:04
Originally by: Crazy Dave
I have to agree. about the whole nudity issue. If you cant have it clothing optional, then at least provide the women with G string clothing as an option. Laughing


<< I would be happy with just leaving them as they are now and not have the reuiring shirt thing.... altho I've heard they oversold station walking in Incarna.... bikini's or G strings would make it a lot more appealing imo :)

Crazy Renegade
Posted - 2011.01.27 16:43:00 - [50]
 

Isn't neutral and no standing one and the same. I mean if you don't have a standing, that makes you neutral. I'm confused. Cool

Daimian Mercer
Blue Sun Enterprises
Posted - 2011.01.27 16:47:00 - [51]
 

What about fleet bonuses?? (Warfare links)

I see nothing in the patch notes about fixing this. Is this not a priority for CCP? I would like to know if its even being addressed.

I know you can fix it by revoking and re-applying, but doing this on a gate fight and confirming it worked is a good way to die.

Feline Ferocity
Caldari
Agony Unleashed
Agony Empire
Posted - 2011.01.27 17:00:00 - [52]
 

Edited by: Feline Ferocity on 27/01/2011 17:00:48
Originally by: Aargolos
One small quip: CTRL-Q to quit.

I just want to quit, I DO NOT want to go back to the login screen. Thanks.


you can set this back to what it used to be, i have done it.

hit ESC > Shortcuts > General > clear the shortcut for log off, clear the short cut for quit game, then edit the shortcut for quit game by setting it Ctrl+Q.

done.


but yeah CCP please stop fixing stuff that isn't broken. like the overview and shortcuts jeebus christ.

bring back the old overview settings, BEFORE the new incarna/incursion whatever you wanna call it patches.

Annasophia Smith
Posted - 2011.01.27 17:02:00 - [53]
 

Originally by: Daimian Mercer
What about fleet bonuses?? (Warfare links)

I see nothing in the patch notes about fixing this. Is this not a priority for CCP? I would like to know if its even being addressed.

I know you can fix it by revoking and re-applying, but doing this on a gate fight and confirming it worked is a good way to die.


I think you might have missed the point of the incursion. I recomend reading the patch notes but more importantly watch the videos about the incursion. They were intentionally designed with the concept that no bonuses will be used and that all players will participate with a handicap that covers all ships, weapons, modules as well as implants. In short they were designed to be tougher than a C6 wormhole sleeper.

Reteris
Caldari
Eaglewrath Incorporated
Posted - 2011.01.27 17:05:00 - [54]
 

Originally by: JCache
Originally by: Stormchyld
<< I agree.... there's no nudity shown so what's the problem?

No nudity... well, there's your problem. Rolling Eyes


Oh no, that'd be too easy Wink Gotta "fill in the blanks". Work for that entertainment. heh.

Joe McCrackman
Posted - 2011.01.27 17:07:00 - [55]
 

So, now i have to edit all my overview settings , about 25 for each account to add those with no standings like the neutral which mean no standings to my existings settings ?
How difficult is it to think once before making such changes ?
Why the hell don't you add those with standings set as optional and keep those who used to be neutral and now with no standings as default ?
Noone i know sets standings to neutral standings are either good or bad rest has no standings and is neutral which mean neutral, no specific standings none nothig specific, neutral nothing interesting neutral, no standing, unset !

Lord Thingol
Polish Mercenaries S.A.
Posted - 2011.01.27 17:08:00 - [56]
 

WTH, why are you changing things that dont need to be changed, overview, shortcuts, and MANY other things.

I wanted to turn on brackets, ohhh, i got skill tab, alt+z... nothing ! Why you cannot understand some players play this game for long time and dont want to fight with things that are not relevant.

Want to change something ? Make an easy way to configure overview according to needs, because everytime I need to reinstall eve (or it corrupts itself) I got ill.

Contents changes, I love it, all the new things are nice, but... please dont make worse things that worked fine...

Finally, please IMPROVE the game, don't CHANGE it.



Stormchyld
Minmatar
Posted - 2011.01.27 17:09:00 - [57]
 

Edited by: Stormchyld on 27/01/2011 17:12:13
Edited by: Stormchyld on 27/01/2011 17:11:07
Originally by: Annasophia Smith
Originally by: Daimian Mercer
What about fleet bonuses?? (Warfare links)

I see nothing in the patch notes about fixing this. Is this not a priority for CCP? I would like to know if its even being addressed.

I know you can fix it by revoking and re-applying, but doing this on a gate fight and confirming it worked is a good way to die.[/q

I think you might have missed the point of the incursion. I recomend reading the patch notes but more importantly watch the videos about the incursion. They were intentionally designed with the concept that no bonuses will be used and that all players will participate with a handicap that covers all ships, weapons, modules as well as implants. In short they were designed to be tougher than a C6 wormhole sleeper.


<< it's happening outside of incursions as well... when I have a session change... especially undocking.... no gang bonuses are given. and so far twice I've posted something here and had to go back and edit it because it's not putting my comments at the end.... and yes... I'm making sure I'm scolled all the way to the end of the quote

Argonaught
Minmatar
Cabbage Tea
Posted - 2011.01.27 17:12:00 - [58]
 

PI is still borked, they didn't fix routing from ecu to storage.

http://oi56.tinypic.com/110azxx.jpg

29964 units should be routed as 7491 x 4 cycles = 29964

Whats actually being routed is 9909 a routing loss of 20055 units
(Note: Items being routed are done once an hour as routes aren't dynamic in that way)

It's all well and good fixing the ECU extraction rates but the materials aren't even making it out of there into storage.

CCP. What did you actually fix in PI on this patch?

Argo.

Image changed to URL. Zymurgist

Daimian Mercer
Blue Sun Enterprises
Posted - 2011.01.27 17:14:00 - [59]
 

Originally by: Annasophia Smith
Originally by: Daimian Mercer
What about fleet bonuses?? (Warfare links)

I see nothing in the patch notes about fixing this. Is this not a priority for CCP? I would like to know if its even being addressed.

I know you can fix it by revoking and re-applying, but doing this on a gate fight and confirming it worked is a good way to die.


I think you might have missed the point of the incursion. I recomend reading the patch notes but more importantly watch the videos about the incursion. They were intentionally designed with the concept that no bonuses will be used and that all players will participate with a handicap that covers all ships, weapons, modules as well as implants. In short they were designed to be tougher than a C6 wormhole sleeper.


Thats alot of quoting.. lol

Actually if you might not be aware of the issue I speak of...
With incursion's final patch, it broke fleet bonuses. I do not speak of the incursion effects. I am speaking of leadership skill bonuses and warfare links not being applied to fleet after a session change. Oddly the fleet bonuses were not broken on SiSi 2 days before the TQ patch on Tuesday.

Hlidskjalf
Dynamis New Eden
Cognitive Development
Posted - 2011.01.27 17:18:00 - [60]
 

Quote:
I think you might have missed the point of the incursion. I recomend reading the patch notes but more importantly watch the videos about the incursion. They were intentionally designed with the concept that no bonuses will be used and that all players will participate with a handicap that covers all ships, weapons, modules as well as implants. In short they were designed to be tougher than a C6 wormhole sleeper.

Pretty sure this is a troll, I'll bite anyway. The patch has rendered an entire category of skills (Leadership) unreliable, and priority is instead given to people making pictures without showing a bit too much flesh? I'm no coder, but surely you guys might have been able to fix something as ingrained, and simple as skills correctly applying after a session change in a 3 hour downtime?

For some reason this brings up an image of tetris - you got a gap on the low rows (your bug), but your busy trying to insert new content that isn't quite fitting, and because it ain't fitting, you can't fix your other bugs, and it piles on higher and higher until it topples the server. And then we all die. But not irl. YARRRR!!


Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5

This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 


The new forums are live

Please adjust your bookmarks to https://forums.eveonline.com

These forums are archived and read-only