open All Channels
seplocked Assembly Hall
blankseplocked The CSM wants to get rid of Jump Bridges.
 
This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 
Pages: first : previous : ... 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 [21]

Author Topic

deathpain
Gallente
The Graduates
Posted - 2011.05.13 11:19:00 - [601]
 

Edited by: deathpain on 13/05/2011 11:20:17
Does CCP even know what they want to do with null ? Because they have nerfed two things recently and then they are saying after they have done this then they are going to look at what there doing with null. This makes no sense at all, and then they also said that they want the industry in null sec to be able to keep up with the population. How are we supposed to do that when they nerf jump bridges, in which is vital to our logistics for industry. They really dont seem to know what they are doing, and say they want more people wanting to play in null where as they are making it less worth while being in null sec. Its starting to get to the point that you can make more isk running Level 4 missions rather then null sec ratting. And then there removing our logistics capabilities aswell ? And all this before they actually look at what they want to do with null. CSM please get CCP to look at what they are doing with this game, and how they are seriously affecting those in null, in which CCP say that they wish to help with updates. Fix things that dont work, dont break things that do....

Ecoskii
Posted - 2011.05.15 12:51:00 - [602]
 

So another completely ignored thread for CCP - grats. I wonder if there is some form of award for Services to Industry for Ignoring Customer Feedback? Back up your half-baked ideas with consultation, support it with DATA, and provide intelligent responses to points raised. Until then, stop playing with stuff that you have demonstrated little understanding of.

Mr LaForge
Posted - 2011.05.15 13:11:00 - [603]
 

Edited by: Mr LaForge on 15/05/2011 13:11:48
Supporting the un nerfing of JBs.

Manfred Sideous
Body Count Inc.
Pandemic Legion
Posted - 2011.05.15 17:41:00 - [604]
 

Originally by: Dr Cheeto
Edited by: Dr Cheeto on 15/01/2011 21:34:23
Edited by: Dr Cheeto on 15/01/2011 21:34:15
In addition to the legitimate concerns voiced above, this would be a massive buff to capitals and supercapitals, especially Titans. Essentially, an alliance with sufficient funds and high-SP pilots could just get a Titan to bridge subcapital ships on every operation of any importance. Meanwhile, the plebeians who have one or two Titans in their alliance may have to burn 30 jumps to get to where they need to go.

Additionally, the Supercarrier pilots can just give a hearty "lol subcaps" in local and jump out of system.

Rich, old alliances would have the difficulty of keeping their space empires running pretty much unchanged, while newer, poorer alliances would be screwed out of nullsec.

This would be a major step in bringing EVE Online closer to Supercaps Online, and it is exceedingly odd that it was considered seriously, as the minutes show that the CSM discussed the Supercapital hotdrop as being more-or-less a "win" button in nullsec engagements right before discussing why jump bridges should be removed.


There is a well known workaround to this. *snip* Spitfire some isk buy a high sp toon and supercap.

n4d444
Volition Cult
Fatal Ascension
Posted - 2011.05.20 06:38:00 - [605]
 

If ccp plans to boost 0.0 industry and/or nerf high sec industry so we dont depend on Jita for everything in 0.0 then this change makes perfect sense.

If you just keep nefring 0.0 people will simply go to empire, run missions there (or other isk making activites) and clone jump back to 0.0 to have some fun. To some people this makes perfect sense it just eludes me.


Pages: first : previous : ... 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 [21]

This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 


The new forums are live

Please adjust your bookmarks to https://forums.eveonline.com

These forums are archived and read-only