open All Channels
seplocked Features and Ideas Discussion
blankseplocked Manufacturing Tech II BPO's
 
This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 
Author Topic

Mitherien
Posted - 2010.12.23 14:31:00 - [1]
 

I would like to see a system put in place to create Tech II Blueprint Originals similar to the way Tech II Blueprint Copies are made. Invention


shady trader
Posted - 2010.12.23 14:36:00 - [2]
 

Why create a new posted? There are hundreds of posts about creating tech BPO's via invention most with a lot more detail.

Mimrezar
Posted - 2010.12.23 14:40:00 - [3]
 

Originally by: shady trader
Why create a new posted? There are hundreds of posts about creating tech BPO's via invention most with a lot more detail.


I must have missed them. I also didn't see it posted in the Commonly Proposed Ideas so I thought I would put it up for consideration.

Lady Spank
Amarr
In Praise Of Shadows
Posted - 2010.12.23 14:46:00 - [4]
 

No

Mitherien
Posted - 2010.12.23 15:00:00 - [5]
 

Originally by: Lady Spank
No


And why not? I would like to know why you disagree.

shady trader
Posted - 2010.12.23 16:35:00 - [6]
 

Page 3 of this forum, was the lasted for this forum created 4 days ago.

There is also another in the science and industry forum created in the last 24 hours.

CCP only add to the commonly proposed ideas tread when players suggest it and the threads have been coming up for months. CCP have already stated that no new tech 2 BPO will be introduced there is little point have discussions about it.

Tech2 BPO via invention

CCP have stated that the idea of tech2 BPO was a bad idea but since the current owners are normally not the person who won them, its not fair to just take them away. Instead CCP have decided to play the long game and let them end up on inactive/banned accounts or have accidents during transport.

Want to know more about this, do a search (eve-search.com) you will find about a thousand posts either to reintroduce tech2 BPO via invention or to remove them completely.

Hirana Yoshida
Behavioral Affront
Posted - 2010.12.23 17:02:00 - [7]
 

Originally by: Mitherien
And why not? I would like to know why you disagree.

Because current owners have trillions invested in the prints themselves, some with 5-10 year profitability horizons.
Because adding BPO's at the present time would crash all relevant markets, make certain moon owners trillions and devalue existing BPO's.
Because invention is already a very lucrative and to be honest one of the more fun carebear activities available.

Need more reasons? Read the countless threads already active on this exact topic (use Eve-Search because forum search is crap)

Marchocias
Posted - 2010.12.23 23:28:00 - [8]
 

Personally I don't think T2 BPOs should be changed, they're an interesting historical artifact...

I'd like to see invention given a small change, with there being a chance of getting meta 1/2/3/4 named BPCs (maybe requiring some T2 components, less than a T2 blueprint).

Torothanax
Posted - 2010.12.24 05:11:00 - [9]
 

I don't see why not. Apperently learning skills were unfair. T2 bpo's are even less fair considering the way they were handed out. At least anyone could train learning skills.

Convert them all to BPC's or add a way to obtain t2 bpo's.

shady trader
Posted - 2010.12.24 10:46:00 - [10]
 

Originally by: Marchocias
Personally I don't think T2 BPOs should be changed, they're an interesting historical artifact...

I'd like to see invention given a small change, with there being a chance of getting meta 1/2/3/4 named BPCs (maybe requiring some T2 components, less than a T2 blueprint).


I dis agree, I think the only main change needed to invention is for the ability to get positive ME/PE prints. This could be a function of very slow to train skills or based on the ME of the tech 1 BPC.

I personally think the skills are a better way, this way full time inventors have advantage over someone's invention alt.

Toric Gaul
Posted - 2010.12.25 22:40:00 - [11]
 

Well something needs to change. Invention sucks ass vs BPOs. The price of t2 BPOs is a pretty good indicator of this. Fix it CCP.

Venkul Mul
Gallente
Posted - 2010.12.25 23:10:00 - [12]
 

Originally by: Toric Gaul
Well something needs to change. Invention sucks ass vs BPOs. The price of t2 BPOs is a pretty good indicator of this. Fix it CCP.


Rolling Eyes 5 years to get back the isk.

Invention don't sucks. Inventors competing with each other are reduced the margins to the minimum. Same as T1 production.

Removing T2 BPO will accomplish nothing.

Vertical
Amarr
Relentless Enterprises
Ore Federation
Posted - 2010.12.26 14:45:00 - [13]
 

Edited by: Vertical on 26/12/2010 14:45:34


T2 bpos? Buy them if u have the cash and if not: SELL GTC's and you can buy them too.


Simple. Period. :

p.s. Nice whining btw wuahahaha!


 

This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 


The new forums are live

Please adjust your bookmarks to https://forums.eveonline.com

These forums are archived and read-only