open All Channels
seplocked Test Server Feedback
blankseplocked Mass-test feedback - October 21st
 
This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 
Pages: [1] 2

Author Topic

CCP Habakuk

Posted - 2010.10.21 19:42:00 - [1]
 

Hi! If you participated in the masstest on the 21st October, please reply in this thread to give your feedback, based on following template:

Machine Info

  • OS version:

  • CPU:

  • GPU:

  • RAM:


User Experience

  • Average FPS during the fight at the end, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out:

    • Zoomed in:

  • On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome)

  • Did you notice any problem with the overview?

  • Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:


Swidgen
Posted - 2010.10.21 20:11:00 - [2]
 

User Experience: N/A

Could not even log in because the login screen was completely black. When are you guys actually going to test something before releasing it to the public?

CCP Captain Fabulous


Gallente
C C P
C C P Alliance
Posted - 2010.10.21 21:05:00 - [3]
 

Originally by: Swidgen
User Experience: N/A

Could not even log in because the login screen was completely black. When are you guys actually going to test something before releasing it to the public?


The jig is up - the players know we've been playing Minecraft instead of testing. Embarassed

AllY M
Caldari Provisions
Posted - 2010.10.21 21:11:00 - [4]
 

Originally by: CCP Captain Fabulous
Originally by: Swidgen
User Experience: N/A

Could not even log in because the login screen was completely black. When are you guys actually going to test something before releasing it to the public?


The jig is up - the players know we've been playing Minecraft instead of testing. Embarassed


Because clearly Minecraft is the better game Cool

Gorek Loc
Rising Ashes Inc.
Important Internet Spaceship League
Posted - 2010.10.21 21:22:00 - [5]
 

Edited by: Gorek Loc on 21/10/2010 21:34:17
If you participated in the masstest on the 21st October, please reply in this thread to give your feedback, based on following template:

Machine Info

  • OS version: Windows Vista SP1, 32bit

  • CPU: Intel Quadcore, 2.4GHz

  • GPU: nVidia 8800GT

  • RAM: 3GB


User Experience

  • Average FPS during the fight at the end, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 1.8fps

    • Zoomed in: 5.0

  • On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 2

  • Did you notice any problem with the overview? No, all good

  • Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: fleet had very slow fps


Morgenholt Blue
RED.Legion
Posted - 2010.10.21 21:22:00 - [6]
 

Edited by: Morgenholt Blue on 21/10/2010 21:26:00
Machine Info

  • OS version: Windows 7 64 bit

  • CPU: Intel QX9650

  • GPU: GTX 480

  • RAM: 8GB


User Experience

  • Average FPS during the fight at the end, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 28

    • Zoomed in: 20

  • On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? 8 (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome)

  • Did you notice any problem with the overview? No

  • Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Got there just before the node crash, client froze for a sec when I was warping in but was fine after that. 1.4 FPS during that bomb you guys dropped..


Hordi LaGeorge
Posted - 2010.10.21 21:23:00 - [7]
 

OS10.6.4
Intel Core 2 Duo 2.66 mhz
NVIDIA GeForce 9400M
4 gig RAM DDR3 1067 MHz
FPS zoomed out: 0.4. Zoomed in: 0.2
Never seen it anywhere near this low on TQ: rating of 2

Note: I was running 2 clients on my MacBook Pro, and that tends to halve the frame rate.

No overview issues

During the fight, the lag was so bad I did little of use, just watched both ships explode while trying to get some damage on someone.

During the POS battle both clients crashed soon after we noticed that the tower had no stront.

I elected to call it a day at that point.

Possible bug: When I tried grouping guns after undocking, the guns would jump about in their slots. Will see if I can reproduce at some time.



Mr Bigwinky
Posted - 2010.10.21 21:25:00 - [8]
 

Machine Info


* OS version: Windows 7 Ultimate

* CPU: QuadCore Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600, 3000 MHz (9 x 333)

* GPU: 2x NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT (sli) (512 MB)

* RAM: 4095MB


User Experience


* Average FPS during the fight at the end, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 18

o Zoomed in: 14

* On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome)
4
* Did you notice any problem with the overview?
no
* Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:
Brackets make a large amount of difference to FPS for the benefit they include. Perhaps finding a way of notifying the pilot of his circumstances (that would normally be done via brackets) could be done in another way?

Aurora Cobalt
Posted - 2010.10.21 21:26:00 - [9]
 

OS: Win 7
CPU: AMD 940 X4 3.0 GHz
GPU: ATI Radeon 5870
Ram: OCZ DDR2 800, 8 Gb

FPS-out: 15-20
FPS-in: 12-14

Performance Rating: 6

Overview Problems: None, it seemed to be working fine.

Experience: I encountered alot of lag durning the test which made it difficult to play the game. Note: my graphics is turned on Max settings and i have not had trouble on TQ with regular game play and usning 2 accounts.

Chancellor November
Gallente
The Night Crew
Posted - 2010.10.21 21:30:00 - [10]
 

Machine Info

•OS version: Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit (6.1, Build 7600)

•CPU: AMD Phenom(tm) II X4 955 Processor (4 CPUs), ~3.2GHz

•GPU: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460

•RAM: 8192MB RAM



User Experience



•Average FPS during the fight at the end, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 30 (full effects, and shadows & HDR - no drones, bloom, or brackets)


◦Zoomed in: (as above) 23


•On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 5 - normal for me... no lag, except during jumps, 60fps with full fleet on gatecamp and full effects


•Did you notice any problem with the overview? none



OptimuzPR
Posted - 2010.10.21 21:30:00 - [11]
 

Machine Info

OS version: Windows 7

CPU: Core 2 Quad @ 2.8

GPU: nVidia GeForce 9800GTX+

RAM: 4G


User Experience

Average FPS during the fight at the end, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 10-18

Zoomed in: 2-5

On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) - 5

Did you notice any problem with the overview? - No

Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:

As usual it got quite laggy when fleets combined. POS Bash was laggy but beareable, until the node crashed. XD

zohan disco
Posted - 2010.10.21 21:31:00 - [12]
 

Machine Info
RAM: 4GB
CPU: AMD Phenom II x4 3.40GHz
OS version: Win 7 Ultimate 32bit
User Experience
GPU: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275
Average FPS during the fight at the end, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out:
During the fight was around 50 after was 80
Zoomed in: 10-20 during and 75 after
On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 6
Did you notice any problem with the overview? Nope
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:
Jump into F67E was super fast and loaded right away.
Jump into Poitot was quick even though I got a traffic advisory loaded good.
Docking was normal.
Undocking was kinda slow but when loaded the overview was good.
Jump into X-B was awesome fast! (fleet x)
Fight was great, locking, cycle times and even drones were perfect.
POS bash was good until I dc.

ShadoJak
Posted - 2010.10.21 21:33:00 - [13]
 

Machine: low end, Win XP, GeForce 9400 GT

FPS:
during undocking, the screen was black for long enough to see a stable ~20 FPS.
with no brackets, I got around 7 FPS
the game becomes unplayable (at my skills) around 4 FPS
-- I hate 'no brackets', I might as well play a text adventure if I'm giving up the video feedback
if 5=same, then this was a 4

Overview was always fine, but the test was not similar to times I've seen the problems on TQ
I usually see it when ships are jumping opposite directions, mainly on the trade routes between the 4 hubs

Crash was fun, I got a nice view of the entire battle and didn't know it had happened for awhile.
Best Test so far, I was never disconnected, and actually survived several attacks during the fleet battle -- but I would suggest a fleet battle where FleetW didn't know the exact second FleetX was coming. Ship performance was the closest to TQ I've seen yet.

Yanky Redneck
Posted - 2010.10.21 21:35:00 - [14]
 

Machine Info
RAM: 4GB
CPU: AMD Phenom II x4 3.40GHz
OS version: Win 7 Ultimate 32bit
User Experience

GPU: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275
Average FPS during the fight at the end, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out:
During the fight was around 50 after was 75
Zoomed in: 10-15 during and 75 after
On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 6
Did you notice any problem with the overview? Nope
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:
Jump into F67E was super fast and loaded right away.
Jump into Poitot was quick even though I got a traffic advisory loaded good.
Docking was normal.
Undocking was kinda slow but when loaded the overview was good.
Jump into X-B was awesome fast! (fleet x)
Fight was great, locking, cycle times and even drones were perfect.
POS bash was good until I dc.
Didn't get killed by the SB of doom though :(

baschthe tirent
Caldari
Space Explorations and Excavations
Majesta Frontier Alliance
Posted - 2010.10.21 21:40:00 - [15]
 

Machine Info


* OS version:Vista 64bit

* CPU:Intel centrino 2

* GPU:Nvidia Geforce 9800m GTS

* RAM:4GB


User Experience


* Average FPS during the fight at the end, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out:60 fps

o Zoomed in: 6fps

* On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 5

* Did you notice any problem with the overview?NO

* Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Needs more rewards for masstesting like somthing big on sisi and somthing small on tq for ppl that help alot on these testsCool

Mythane
Posted - 2010.10.21 21:42:00 - [16]
 

Edited by: Mythane on 21/10/2010 21:44:25
Machine Info


* OS version: Windows 7 64bit

* CPU: C2D T9400 @ 2.53GHz

* GPU: GeForce 9700m GT 512MB

* RAM: 4GB DDR2


User Experience


* Average FPS during the fight at the end, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 30FPS

o Zoomed in: 10FPS

* On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 4

* Did you notice any problem with the overview? No

* Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Seemed a little laggier than normal, but that was about it.

lazy missilespammer
Brotherhood of The Saltire
R-I-P
Posted - 2010.10.21 21:53:00 - [17]
 

Machine info:

OS: Windows Vista SP2 home premium 32bit

CPU: AMD Phenom 9550 Quad core 2.2Ghz

GPU: Nvidia Geforce 8600GT 256Mb

RAM: 4GB DDR2

User experience:

Average FPS: 20-30 fps rolled up and down between the 2 amounts brackets off.

Scale: 2.5 (until node died ofc)

overview problems: only things i had were the usual things the hostile colours appearing on stations align to and warp to icons appearing on players and stayin on other players.

Didnt show a few players during the first fight.

all in all was fun the fleet warping and waitin at the start gave me a average of 30-40 fps with brackets off during the fighting it only really dropped to 20 fps with brackets off, i usually sit at 59.9 fps normally

Zero Yin
Gallente
Posted - 2010.10.21 21:56:00 - [18]
 

Edited by: Zero Yin on 21/10/2010 21:58:34
Machine Info


* OS version: Windows XP

* CPU: Intel Dual Core 1,6Ghz

* GPU: ASUS Extreme AX550

* RAM: 1GB


User Experience


* Average FPS during the fight at the end, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 5-10fps

o Zoomed in: 1-3fps

* On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 7

* Did you notice any problem with the overview?
No problems experienced. I actually expected some as I have seen that happen quite many times on TQ. But didn't get any overview problems during the whole test.

* Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Maybe it was because of the smaller number of fleets, but the gate jumps felt very smooth, compared to other times. The crash in the POS killing part was very sudden, but it executed in an easy way - meaning - I was able to log back in faster than after other crashes. Might be related to memory.

Jdestars
Stars Research systems Incorporation
Posted - 2010.10.21 22:02:00 - [19]
 

Edited by: Jdestars on 21/10/2010 22:17:45
]
* OS version: Windows 7 integral (64bit)

* CPU:I7 Intel Core I7 975 (quadcore 3.33 Ghz)

* GPU: GTX 470 (upgrade Nvidia display driver to 260.89

* RAM: 6gb


User Experience


* Average FPS during the fight at the end, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out:before and after 60

o Zoomed in: 7-35

* On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) dont have referal to TQ

* Did you notice any problem with the overview? impossible to choice a target during the fight to faste change in overview ((seems instable since last time for me )

* Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: since last test (14/10 ) the memory are stable not up behind 1.5 Gb , but little more lag during combat and client shutdown during kill of tower

Amorydalis
Gallente
Saint Industrial Services
Partners of Industrial Service and Salvage
Posted - 2010.10.21 22:09:00 - [20]
 

Machine Info


* OS version: windows vista home prm

* CPU:amd Phenom(tm) 9850 Quad-core proc. 2.50 ghz

* GPU:ATI Radeon HD 5770

* RAM:3 gb


User Experience


* Average FPS during the fight at the end, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out:

o Zoomed in: couldnt load with 3 clients

* On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 7

* Did you notice any problem with the overview? none

* Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:

over all was good but the un-nontesters cuase lag issues was an issue. at 1 point in the test i think it mass droped everyone. and id have to say it didnt have any doublein issues, just hard to target/find target in the pvp portion if u have 3 fleets, and no group coornation. aside from that seems like a smooth test and fixed few things.

Silent Twilight
Gallente
Posted - 2010.10.21 22:12:00 - [21]
 

Machine Info
* OS version: winXP Pro SP3 32-bit
* CPU: Core 2 Duo @ 3.00 GHz
* GPU: nVidia GeForce 8800GT
* RAM: 2 GB

Average FPS during the fight at the end, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out:
25-30
Zoomed in: ~25
Zooming in and out didn't seem to have notable impact on FPS.
During POS attack FPS was 5-10 lower and dropped down to ~1 after the smartbomb of DOOM.
// Drone models, turret efects and camera shake off, Bloom: none, shaders, LOD and textures high, other Graphic Content Settings off.

Did you notice any problem with the overview?
Apart from multiple target marks at the very end of the gate fight everything seemed fine.

Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:
Very smooth fight and surprisingly quick gate jumps. But that might be because the number of pilots was rather small.
Mass-undock was quite long for me, but Jita inhabitants seemed to take it as normal.
The only real problem I had was with the chat. When me and my corpmate tried to type using Cyrillic letters, the first phrase was strangely cut in half diagonally with upper part invisible. And then, after a phrase or two, the chat window froze. That repeated in new windows as well, so we had to go over to English. Corpmate told that something like this appeared on TQ before the rollback of the 5th patch, and everything was normal there right before mass-test, so I assume you are aware of this problem.

Zlake
Smashing Atoms
Manicorns
Posted - 2010.10.21 23:13:00 - [22]
 

Machine Info


* OS version:Windows 7

* CPU: Intel Core 2 Quad CPU Q6600 2.4GHz

* GPU:nVidia 8800GT

* RAM:4


User Experience


* Average FPS during the fight at the end, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 5-10

o Zoomed in: 10-15

* On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 7.5

* Did you notice any problem with the overview? I had a clientside issue where the players colour [red, orange etc] was not moving with the players name, so a station appeared red for example.

* Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Good fun time, shame about 2 parts: 1 the node crash, 2 I lost my mach.

Amaya Kulotsuki
Amarr
Destry's Lounge
Important Internet Spaceship League
Posted - 2010.10.21 23:17:00 - [23]
 

Machine Info

OS version: Windows 7 Enterprise 32-bit

CPU: Intel Core2 2.16GHz

GPU: ATI Radeon X1600

RAM: 2.0GB


User Experience

Average FPS during the fight at the end, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 60FPS

Zoomed in: 15FPS

On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 8

Did you notice any problem with the overview?
The issue with double entries did not occur. No significant lag in overview changes. Fleet tags actually worked instead of getting stuck on random objects.

Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:
Jump in was a bit awkward. Different elements loaded at different times and at first I thought I was warped back to the MHC-. Undock had black screen but having not been part of mass undocks on TQ I cannot compare.

Denihol
Minmatar
Everset Dropbears
Posted - 2010.10.21 23:48:00 - [24]
 

Edited by: Denihol on 21/10/2010 23:53:36
Machine Info

OS version: Microsoft Windows XP SP3 Media Center Edition

CPU: Intel Core2 CPU 6300 @ 1.86GHz (dual core)

GPU: GeForce 9800 GT

RAM: 2Gb

User Experience

Average FPS during the fight at the end, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 40

Zoomed in: 15

On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) I'd say a 3-4

Did you notice any problem with the overview? None, other than during the short fight, but that was due to lag.

Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:
Lag was terrible during the battle, jumping was somewhat awkard, so was undocking due in part to longer than usual loading times, client locked up during the assault on POS, called it a day after

Solo Gray
Gray Ghost Industrials
Posted - 2010.10.21 23:53:00 - [25]
 

Machine Info
Dell XPS

•OS version:
Vista

•CPU:
AMD Phenom 9850 Quad-Core Processor

•RAM:
4.00 GB

•Average FPS during the fight at the end, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out:
At the end, the FPS averaged in the low 50s.

◦Zoomed in:
Forgot to check :(

•On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome)
Compared to previous tests, I noticed definite improvement, I'd give it a 7 or 8 up until the node crashed.

•Did you notice any problem with the overview?
I noticed that the target icon would not disappear when the ship was destroyed; it'd transpose itself onto the next ship even though it was not a targeted ship.

•Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:
Looking forward to the next mas testing. Perhaps assign FC's or designated target caller, not everyone was on eve voice, but I guess that was not an issue.

APHRATTOS
Posted - 2010.10.21 23:57:00 - [26]
 

Thanks for telling me about minecraft - excellent game with hardly any lag. Many of lifes problems can be solved by hitting things with hammers. I could not log in to the singularity test server, just got a blank screen with intro music. So why did that happen? What was I doing wrong? How do I log in to the test server?

Leiture
Amarr
Liliis tenaci vimine jungor
Posted - 2010.10.22 09:58:00 - [27]
 

Machine Info


* OS version windows 7 64 bits

* CPU intel E8400

* GPU ATI 4850

* RAM 4GB

User Experience


* Average FPS during the fight at the end, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 30-32

o Zoomed in: 20

* On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 7

* Did you notice any problem with the overview? No

* Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: all was good, even the fast relog after the node crash. It could be useful for non initiate pvp players to have some preset fitting.

gavin gor
Minmatar
Posted - 2010.10.22 11:05:00 - [28]
 

same as last time 2.8gb cpu single core win xp sp3
2 gb memory
splinter of wood from the ark grafix card geforce 6800lx

fleet assembly 25fps
first combat 1.5 fps
pos bash 0.5fps

about the same as null sec fleet fights
very good experiance now will look to update grafix to flint axe or some think

Chris Bailey
Posted - 2010.10.22 14:47:00 - [29]
 

Machine Info


* OS version:Windows 7

* CPU:AMD 6000* Dual core

* GPU:Nvidia Geforce 9500gt

* RAM:4gb


User Experience


* Average FPS during the fight at the end, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out:
21

o Zoomed in:
15
* On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome)
Awesome
* Did you notice any problem with the overview?

* Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:

MotherMoon
Huang Yinglong
Posted - 2010.10.22 16:09:00 - [30]
 

Originally by: APHRATTOS
Thanks for telling me about minecraft - excellent game with hardly any lag. Many of lifes problems can be solved by hitting things with hammers. I could not log in to the singularity test server, just got a blank screen with intro music. So why did that happen? What was I doing wrong? How do I log in to the test server?


wow! no lag in a single player game? madness!


Pages: [1] 2

This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 


The new forums are live

Please adjust your bookmarks to https://forums.eveonline.com

These forums are archived and read-only