open All Channels
seplocked Assembly Hall
blankseplocked [CROWD SOURCE] Microtransactions (1st Vote Result Counted)
 
This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 
Pages: first : previous : ... 48 49 50 51 [52] 53 54 55 56 ... : last (137)

Author Topic

Brother Pullo
Posted - 2011.06.23 20:32:00 - [1531]
 

Cosmetic only.

Daeled
Posted - 2011.06.23 20:33:00 - [1532]
 

NO

Glasgow Dunlop
Posted - 2011.06.23 20:45:00 - [1533]
 

NO

Toovhon
Posted - 2011.06.23 20:59:00 - [1534]
 

Vanity items only please, nothing else. Better yet no micro-transactions beyond PLEX at all, but I'm realistic, so vanity only at least.

Darth Khasei
Posted - 2011.06.23 21:06:00 - [1535]
 

Originally by: Sinnek
YES


I do not care if a week old noob buys 200 million skill points and a titan.

what ever they do, they will not have an advantage over me, merely be up to equal within less time, and does not change my game play in any way what so ever.

a CCP with more money is an EVE with more/better hardware/devs/features/fixes.


Buying a Titan cuts out the Titan builder in EVE and effect "their" gameplay tremendously. This is why this should only be for cosmetic stuff.

Ivanna Nuke
Gallente
Holders Of The Cowbell
Posted - 2011.06.23 21:13:00 - [1536]
 

no

Sinnek
Minmatar
CTRL-Q
Posted - 2011.06.23 21:20:00 - [1537]
 

Edited by: Sinnek on 23/06/2011 21:23:14
Originally by: Darth Khasei
Originally by: Sinnek
YES


I do not care if a week old noob buys 200 million skill points and a titan.



Buying a Titan cuts out the Titan builder in EVE and effect "their" gameplay tremendously. This is why this should only be for cosmetic stuff.


this is assuming that they'll be able to buy a titan that was never built with in-game resources. which I believe they already agreed was a bad idea when rolling back the "free scorpion" deal.

edit: they want to make more money of their game, which is the opposite of destroying it. what ever game hurting issues arise will be dealt with and balanced. change is good. CCP is good. props to them for sticking with this space game vision for so many years while all other competitors, both lasting and fleeting, have had much higher player/subscription numbers.

Dr Geiger
Posted - 2011.06.23 21:31:00 - [1538]
 

No.

Reyvan Severasse
Posted - 2011.06.23 21:33:00 - [1539]
 

No.

Lemming Lass
Minmatar
Lemmings Online
Posted - 2011.06.23 21:59:00 - [1540]
 

No. That's my preference.


But I guess it's ok for cosmetic only, because then I can tell who the douchebags are.

Smeedly
Posted - 2011.06.23 22:38:00 - [1541]
 

No

Stavinsky Elyas
Posted - 2011.06.23 22:55:00 - [1542]
 

Edited by: Stavinsky Elyas on 23/06/2011 23:25:22
NO


Cosmetic could perhaps be added, but it would open the door to the most
dreadfull thing a game can see coming : Microtransaction

I have seen to many free mmorpg going very bad with micro transaction (and not protecting them from any black market)
I have seen how Startrek online has gone bad with micro transaction (and stopped playing it the very moment they started adding ships in the market)
I have seen how Voyage Century online has sunk into the worst nightmare of game with fully open transaction (and how it got litterly highjacked by people with too much wallet and no brains + the high number of game hack and stolen account)
I have seen how Battlestar Galactica is turning in a nightmare where you have to PAY real monney to be able to compete in battles (again too much wallet, with no brain players)

Actualy the only game that has micro transaction that i support is Lotro.
But they are not making it a nuisance to the game, and without
trouble like PVP in every possible ways, and very controlled areas,
most of the players who enjoy Lotro will mostly pay monthly sub
and enjoy the whole of the game instead of just buying it part by part.


I'm ultra feed up with 99% of the transaction ideas.

Eve online has been the best game until now because of the very way the dev kept up with
giving good material, and not letting themselves in the greedy way most of the other company
had let themselves go.

Actualy if CCP realy need a boost in money, i am more than ok with a little upgrade of the
subscription. I would much prefer to pay a couple dollars more each months
(even if that make 25 to 40 dollars more a year) and avoid completely microtransaction in the game.

But one thing is sure, the day a Microtransaction is set in Eve that get further than the Vanity cosmetic
on the Incarna parts, i will cancel both my annual account subscription. And i will surely go further
by asking a reimbursement from the month of the micro transaction insertion to the end of my subscription period.

They can count on that.
And i'm not voting for my friends who plays, but they are thinking like me about the Microtransaction issues.
Eve with micro transaction = no more subscription and stop playing Eve.

Taius Pax
Posted - 2011.06.23 22:56:00 - [1543]
 

No.

Deamos
Dev Null Development and Holdings
Posted - 2011.06.23 22:57:00 - [1544]
 

NO

and No
and No!

Telvani
Crouching Woman Hidden Cucumber
Posted - 2011.06.23 23:00:00 - [1545]
 

NO

Mehta Mezhan
Posted - 2011.06.23 23:08:00 - [1546]
 

Edited by: Mehta Mezhan on 23/06/2011 23:10:19


NO


Sir, thank you for your efforts.
This is what the CSM is supposed to be for Cool

Duchess Starbuckington
Posted - 2011.06.23 23:22:00 - [1547]
 

NO

Wacktopia
Sicarius.
Legion of The Damned.
Posted - 2011.06.23 23:34:00 - [1548]
 

NO

Melkior Mladi
SRBI
Posted - 2011.06.23 23:48:00 - [1549]
 

No!!!

Artassaut
Minmatar
Shadow Striders
Property Management Solutions
Posted - 2011.06.23 23:54:00 - [1550]
 

No.

Alec Freeman
Minmatar
The Dark Space Initiative
Revival Of The Talocan Empire
Posted - 2011.06.24 00:22:00 - [1551]
 

No

Azitek
Astrum Tech
Posted - 2011.06.24 01:05:00 - [1552]
 

NO

Arjen1705
Posted - 2011.06.24 01:51:00 - [1553]
 

No!

Laserham Lincoln
Posted - 2011.06.24 02:07:00 - [1554]
 

Cosmetic only, but would prefer no

Lahha
Caldari
Lahha Kata
Posted - 2011.06.24 02:08:00 - [1555]
 

Edited by: Lahha on 24/06/2011 02:09:50
No

As long as it's just vanity items i can live with it but would prefer see it gone.

LORD BRAHMAN
Posted - 2011.06.24 02:09:00 - [1556]
 

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

OH DID I MENTION NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Angus Thermopollye
Duct Tape Mechanics
Posted - 2011.06.24 02:39:00 - [1557]
 

NO.

Insane Randomness
Posted - 2011.06.24 03:02:00 - [1558]
 

Edited by: Insane Randomness on 24/06/2011 03:05:20
NO

We are not all rich snobs brought up to spend money on useless drivel that costs more than 3 months of play time.

Insane Randomness

Edit: I CAN handle cosmetic only. However, if any rich snobs come up and say "I'm better than you, cause I have a shiny monocle." Let me introduce you to my favorite faction battleship, the Machariel, which I saved for ISK by ISK and can wipe that monocle off your face.

Tea Ester Elliot
Posted - 2011.06.24 03:18:00 - [1559]
 

NO.

General Trajan
Caldari
State War Academy
Posted - 2011.06.24 03:24:00 - [1560]
 

cosmetic only

i believe in give and get. CCP is a company and obviously wants to perk up that bottom line with this MT stuff. and there are people in game that want it and will buy because they can. more importantly for CCP, it will bring in more potential subscribers for the long haul. CCP gets!

now CCP needs to give. give us all the damn fixes in the game we've been wanting for a loooooooooooooooooooooooooooong time now. and preferably before the end of this year at that!


Pages: first : previous : ... 48 49 50 51 [52] 53 54 55 56 ... : last (137)

This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 


The new forums are live

Please adjust your bookmarks to https://forums.eveonline.com

These forums are archived and read-only