open All Channels
seplocked Assembly Hall
blankseplocked [CROWD SOURCE] Microtransactions (1st Vote Result Counted)
 
This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 
Pages: first : previous : ... 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 [136] 137 : last (137)

Author Topic

Cpt Greagor
Caldari
Liquid Relief
Posted - 2011.07.07 11:48:00 - [4051]
 

Two months ago I would have said cosmetic only, but now that I no longer trust CCP to keep it that way, I say none at all.

Endoril
Posted - 2011.07.07 17:25:00 - [4052]
 

NO Evil or Very Mad

Van Derka
Posted - 2011.07.08 04:47:00 - [4053]
 

Edited by: Van Derka on 08/07/2011 04:48:22
NO


Originally by: Sumernight
Cosmetic Only
But only if the gear is player made, like in second life.

Making me turn into a 3d model, forcing me to wear clothes, and then asking me to pay $15 to a dev (who has already been paid) to make a cool shirt that should have been included from the beginning of your wacky 3d model idea is pretty lame.

Seriously, we were fine with a crappy portrait and spinning our ships.



that last line sums it up.

Sheena Takayanagi
Posted - 2011.07.09 09:26:00 - [4054]
 

NO

Riley Barbatos
GoonWaffe
Posted - 2011.07.09 16:20:00 - [4055]
 

No.

D'Leh Mannuck
Posted - 2011.07.09 17:13:00 - [4056]
 

No.

Looking at the statements given by CCP there is too much playroom for introducing gold ammo or ships.
There hasn't been a ferm no to that, only a lot of political jibberjabber which can be turned in any direction needed or wanted.

These aren't the Devs anymore I met back in 2004. They went from devoted gamelovers to bussinessmen. And bussinessmen don't love the game but the cashflow they get from it.

Sasaki Hiroshi
Posted - 2011.07.09 21:44:00 - [4057]
 

No.


Lupus Hekki
Caldari
Legio Carminatus
Posted - 2011.07.10 08:33:00 - [4058]
 

Edited by: Lupus Hekki on 10/07/2011 08:39:14
Well, Yes, as things are bound to show up on the market.

& i want those ship skins once they come out, getting plexes...

What the hell is so bad about MTs?
If you don't want to spend real money for a in world currency, boohoo grow a pair and wait till someone sells them on the market for 1billion or more.
Its not like the NeX store axe murdered your family and children
Sure CCP lied to you, but people and so corporations change, like you never broke a promise.
"Oh they're greedy, they're hunting for our money, we saw so in the leaked bulletin" - yeah real mature, CCP does one greedy action, maybe more, and thats enough for hundreds if not thousands of people to unsubscribe?
Sometimes... I think EVE is filled with 13 year olds who got a hold of their parents credit cards and their parents won't allow the purchase of 6 PLEXes

Also Micro Transactions were always in the game, PLEXes, you pay for a item in game which can be sold for ISK.
Why are you making such a big deal out of something that already exists? They just expanded it

Tutskii
Posted - 2011.07.11 16:04:00 - [4059]
 

No.


TrimethylChromiumdioxide
Caldari
Infinatech
Posted - 2011.07.12 02:42:00 - [4060]
 

No.

Shu Jia
Gallente
Tradewind Union
Posted - 2011.07.12 07:59:00 - [4061]
 

Please check who is their new partner is. Nexon..who good in promoting free game and yet they will provide an in game purchase to power up or to enjoy certain services. Example you want to do rafting or incursion. You will need to buy licence to run Incursion with real money. That is nexon for. I lived in asia and I see a lot of free games and subs will paid huge amounti of money without knowing it because is blinded by the services to power up. Please if CCP wanna to follow the Nexon way of dealing , do it with care cause we have council. Please council monitor CCP closely.

Sincerely,
Shu Jia

Icke Himal
Posted - 2011.07.12 11:32:00 - [4062]
 

Edited by: Icke Himal on 12/07/2011 11:32:01

Cosmetic Only

Dreadmon
Posted - 2011.07.12 11:38:00 - [4063]
 

COSMETIC ONLY

Amarrellah
Posted - 2011.07.12 11:40:00 - [4064]
 

COSMETIC ONLY

Les McMeta
Posted - 2011.07.12 11:41:00 - [4065]
 

COSMETIC ONLY

Agamenox
Posted - 2011.07.15 17:50:00 - [4066]
 

NO

Candente
Caldari
Posted - 2011.07.15 17:59:00 - [4067]
 

Cosmetic Only

and to OP. If you can get rid of the obvious biased words from the original post you might earn a better attention to CCP. You might not like MT, but you don't need to be immature about it.

Alexia page
Posted - 2011.07.15 19:56:00 - [4068]
 

Originally by: Lupus Hekki
Edited by: Lupus Hekki on 10/07/2011 08:39:14
Well, Yes, as things are bound to show up on the market.

& i want those ship skins once they come out, getting plexes...

What the hell is so bad about MTs?
If you don't want to spend real money for a in world currency, boohoo grow a pair and wait till someone sells them on the market for 1billion or more.
Its not like the NeX store axe murdered your family and children
Sure CCP lied to you, but people and so corporations change, like you never broke a promise.
"Oh they're greedy, they're hunting for our money, we saw so in the leaked bulletin" - yeah real mature, CCP does one greedy action, maybe more, and thats enough for hundreds if not thousands of people to unsubscribe?
Sometimes... I think EVE is filled with 13 year olds who got a hold of their parents credit cards and their parents won't allow the purchase of 6 PLEXes

Also Micro Transactions were always in the game, PLEXes, you pay for a item in game which can be sold for ISK.
Why are you making such a big deal out of something that already exists? They just expanded it


It is not what is already in game that is the problem. Yes you can buy plex and sell them for isk and use that isk to buy what ever you want. but this does not hurt the game economy. You are basically buying game time, and trading it to someone for in game stuff/currency. This actually supports the game economy as the isk generated from the plex was worked for buy who ever bought the plex, and the items bought with that isk were made by someone else in game, so PLEX effectively remove isk from the game helping to curb market inflation. The items bought with that isk were made or looted by someone in game who put them up for sale. it comes full circle and supports to in game economy.

The thing many players are affraid of is MT directly for items means players willing to spend real life money can obtain them with no benifit to the other players in game. this is not a problem with vanity items, but what if you could buy the whole ship with the new skin for aurum? This puts a ship into the game that nobody built and with no benefit to the in game economy.

The current plan as I understand it, is for those new ship skins to cost aurum plus the normal skinned ship purchased or made in game. Which is not a problem. But every other MMO that has introduced MT has eventually started to sell items that did effect the game. it start with xp potions or in EVE's case probably some implant that speeds up training time. then moves on to unique weapons, and eventually the best in game items are only available through MT and can not be earned or made in game. This is what most of us are worried about. Not what they are saying now, but what will happen down the road.


T'amber Anomandari Demaleon
Posted - 2011.07.18 21:42:00 - [4069]
 

Originally by: Candente
Cosmetic Only

and to OP. If you can get rid of the obvious biased words from the original post you might earn a better attention to CCP. You might not like MT, but you don't need to be immature about it.


What do you mean biast? It planely states that there are more logical arguments for than against, and each of the three examples specifically promotes itself.


Rayohth
Posted - 2011.07.19 18:37:00 - [4070]
 

YES

I really dont see what all the butthurt is about

Botting and RMT are the real P2W but everyone seems to put up with that so meh..

Hastling
Posted - 2011.07.26 09:32:00 - [4071]
 

(COSMETIC ONLY)

If CCP manages to get some more revenue in vanity items that's fine by me.
Everyone is entitled to spend their money has they think its best and if some player wishes to have a monacle and a golden BS I don't care, as long as that won't give a player an unfair advantage over other's.
If on the other hand this items affect the gameplay in any other way other than visual then CCP's EULA and their stance on macro user's and ISK farmers will have no meaning at all.
In business you "never change a winning horse". For EVE this basicly reflects what the players love most about this game which is the sandbox and the fact that you have to earn everything you have in game.

ThekeeperOfTheCrypt
Caldari
Ignorant Of Science
Posted - 2011.07.28 17:28:00 - [4072]
 

no

Reaver Glitterstim
Legio Geminatus
Posted - 2011.07.29 06:20:00 - [4073]
 

Cosmetic only. Or no. Either way, I'm not saying yes, and I want my vote to count against those who do say yes.

vixeyy
Gallente
Procyon Enclave
Posted - 2011.08.05 20:34:00 - [4074]
 

NO!

Oberine Noriepa
Posted - 2011.08.05 22:43:00 - [4075]
 

Cosmetic only.

Alex Sinai
Mining And Probing Specialists
Posted - 2011.08.05 22:59:00 - [4076]
 

Edited by: Alex Sinai on 05/08/2011 23:11:49
NO

NoX shmoks whatever else CCP comes up with to introduce MT they will kill the game that way. They already miss millions of their income with cancelled accounts. Remove that ***t and fire ***s who proposed it and attempted to push it through. Otherwise they will propose more ***b things and you dear CCP will lose more millions or just break playerbase nerve and kill the game because people will leave by massive numbers.
You don't have anything to offer more then it is now (was before MT) and wont have anything at all to offer to anyone if majority of players leave. Graphics are outdated. Sound not even mention, its laughable. All you have that attract us is unique gameplay and that what we pay for our subscriptions. Greed destroyed many things centuries ago and will destroy a lot more in centuries to come.

I would suggest you to back off and make loud apologies before you destroy your business completely. But who am I, just a paying customer. I hear you don't care about what we say, only about what we do. Well you lost a lot of money with that approach already. Happy CCP?

SuHwak
Trust is Value
Posted - 2011.08.10 11:48:00 - [4077]
 

NO

However, the OP hasn't been updated in a while...

Shahinez
Posted - 2011.08.21 09:15:00 - [4078]
 

No.

That's getting worse and worse

Kane Echerie
Posted - 2011.08.25 19:01:00 - [4079]
 

No Evil or Very Mad

Count Austheim
Raven's Flight
Posted - 2011.08.26 15:57:00 - [4080]
 

No No No Noooooo!

No....

God No...


Pages: first : previous : ... 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 [136] 137 : last (137)

This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 


The new forums are live

Please adjust your bookmarks to https://forums.eveonline.com

These forums are archived and read-only