Author |
Topic |
 Milk Caldari Mashadar Incorporated |
Posted - 2011.06.28 17:31:00 - [ 3841]
Vanity only |
 Tir Jin |
Posted - 2011.06.28 17:32:00 - [ 3842]
vanity only |
 Milburn Drysdale |
Posted - 2011.06.28 17:38:00 - [ 3843]
no |
 helpnuout the united Negative Ten. |
Posted - 2011.06.28 17:48:00 - [ 3844]
cosmetic |
 Lord Starwolf Caldari Kodan Armada
|
Posted - 2011.06.28 17:50:00 - [ 3845]
I'll vote to allow COSMETIC ONLY. What do I care if you have a monocle? Nor do I care if your paladin suddenly sprouts minimatar wings. If it adds an ability or item usable ingame, No way.
I used to be totally against any sort of RMT, but I use plex to fund my accounts. After having been in SWG last 45 days for free, I also don't have a problem with paintings for your quarters or a stupid hat. (TCG)
I do however have issues with it granting abilities, buffs, uber items or anything else.
Of course, SWG didn't benefit so much from RMT (trading card game) did it? It's cancelled on DEC 15.
If you want to spend 50 bucks on a vanity items that's nothing more than a few pixels... I say go for it. I'd rather not see RMT exclusive items that grant any sort of advantage, whether it is ship, item, intel or mobility based. |
 Inkontinenzia Poperzia Caldari Omega Light Industries Inc.
|
Posted - 2011.06.28 18:18:00 - [ 3846]
NO |
 Aylenah |
Posted - 2011.06.28 18:19:00 - [ 3847]
NO |
 Jazeer |
Posted - 2011.06.28 18:23:00 - [ 3848]
No |
 Zavouzo |
Posted - 2011.06.28 18:23:00 - [ 3849]
Cosmetic (Please avoid the item mall idea for actual useful stuff and keep this stuff limited to fancy tigerstripes on my loki and a stripper for a CQ) |
 lupynzo Caldari Ev0ke |
Posted - 2011.06.28 18:24:00 - [ 3850]
No |
 Harland White |
Posted - 2011.06.28 18:36:00 - [ 3851]
Cosmetic only |
 Reflection |
Posted - 2011.06.28 18:45:00 - [ 3852]
No. |
 Holy One SniggWaffe
|
Posted - 2011.06.28 19:13:00 - [ 3853]
No |
 Kirradog |
Posted - 2011.06.28 19:18:00 - [ 3854]
No |
 Ricky Pickering |
Posted - 2011.06.28 19:37:00 - [ 3855]
No |
 Tjarf |
Posted - 2011.06.28 19:49:00 - [ 3856]
No
|
 Dark Assassin15 Failed Diplomacy B A N E |
Posted - 2011.06.28 20:30:00 - [ 3857]
NO ! HELL NO ! Absolutely Not ! Never ! WTF ???
|
 Julius Mayaki |
Posted - 2011.06.28 20:33:00 - [ 3858]
Cosmetic Only.
|
 Kiljaedenas |
Posted - 2011.06.28 20:43:00 - [ 3859]
Cosmetic only. If pay-to-win items/ships show up, I'm going to make it my mission to blow up as many of them as I can, hisec or otherwise. |
 Kina Ayami Affari Sporchi
|
Posted - 2011.06.28 20:49:00 - [ 3860]
NO I'd say cosmetic only but with "greedy" people you give a finger and they take the arm...porcodio!  |
 Lilandraa |
Posted - 2011.06.28 21:02:00 - [ 3861]
Edited by: Lilandraa on 28/06/2011 21:21:51Cosmetic only BUT ONLY IF: You require an ingame earned/traded item for every microtransaction item. This may seem like less MT fun, but it should actually be more MT fun.I was typing a reply to motivate my answer, but it got so long it turned into a new thread: The cash to isk market and vanity items MT
I've read a lot of arguments lately for and against MT in a competitive non f2p mmo, but I feel that the core issue is not being stressed enough: the ability to turn cash into ingame wealth or power. Isk, not just power items. So I try to explain my understanding of the eve market and the effects of cash flowing into the game. I also explain why I feel that CCP can't control the cash to isk market the way they seem to intend, and I propose an alternative MT system that includes a control by the player base and market. You may not agree with me, but please join the discussion about cash to isk/power through vanity items MT :) |
 Alana Blackrose |
Posted - 2011.06.28 21:05:00 - [ 3862]
NO |
 Ariana Agalder |
Posted - 2011.06.28 21:08:00 - [ 3863]
No. |
 C Klinchock |
Posted - 2011.06.28 21:43:00 - [ 3864]
Cosmetic Only |
 bomocho Gallente
|
Posted - 2011.06.28 22:05:00 - [ 3865]
No |
 Decalfi |
Posted - 2011.06.28 22:10:00 - [ 3866]
Cosmetic only. |
 Jiird Kert |
Posted - 2011.06.28 22:18:00 - [ 3867]
No. |
 Tuco Forever |
Posted - 2011.06.28 22:26:00 - [ 3868]
NO |
 Lady Artos |
Posted - 2011.06.28 22:35:00 - [ 3869]
Cosmetic Only |
 Leah Aishai United Base Players INC. |
Posted - 2011.06.29 00:04:00 - [ 3870]
Cosmetic only. |