open All Channels
seplocked Assembly Hall
blankseplocked Hot Topics of the Assembly Hall - Aug 23 - 0.0 update
 
This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]

Author Topic

Soden Rah
Gallente
EVE University
Ivy League
Posted - 2011.06.22 19:04:00 - [91]
 

Originally by: Obsidian Hawk
Originally by: Soden Rah
Originally by: Obsidian Hawk
EDIT -

Added station / incarna / video card / hanger related issues.

Protect our ship spinning and our video card with the option to load incarna environment.


yes... after it hits TQ... given we raised this about a month ago wouldn't then have been the time for CSM action?


The CSM is far too busy fighting over Technium moons and losing their space to care about issues raised in game.


But fear not, soon they wont have any more 0.0 space and then they will have to come to the forums.

ALSO if you have any complaints, please eve mail your CSM delegates at

The Mittani
Seleene
UAxDEATH
Trebor Daehdoow
Killer2



I sent one to vile rat, who has CSM delegate on the forums...
He didn't (hasn't yet) respond...

Also isn't the above a pretty good reason to fire the CSM?

Mocam
Posted - 2011.06.23 09:10:00 - [92]
 

Originally by: Cyprus Black
I noticed one of the biggest issues here in AH isn't on that list. All the botting that's going on. There's usually two or three threads on the first page about the rampant and unchecked botting that's going on ingame.


Pulling this one out for one reason - I came across "botting" issues a week or so ago and it still sticks in my head.

Someone was talking about this batch of bots operating in a system - they reported it. I flew out to see this for myself because I generally don't spend much time poking around highsec mining areas any more.

I get out there, find a batch of ships mining, I sent a tell to one of them and waited a bit. A couple minutes later, I get a reply back so I chatted with the guy. "some F****** jerk-... saying I run bots again?" Guy was AFK mining with multiple accounts but was being reported a lot for botting.

It makes me wonder how many *REAL* bots are being run versus multiple-accounts being run by players who do things like AFK mining.

Understand I don't doubt for a minute that botting isn't an issue nor that it's happening but when I chat with someone who's a bit ticked-off because their multiple-accounts are always being seen as bots... It kind of begs the question on how many assume every group of ships AFK mining are bots so scream "bots everywhere!!!"

Boomer Aires
Posted - 2011.06.27 00:46:00 - [93]
 

Hi all,

will "Monetizing Your Apps and Services" be an issue also?

Alghara
Posted - 2011.06.27 09:17:00 - [94]
 

1) MT can sell only cosmetic stuff for perso or ship.

2) Pls CCP make a planification for all modification you would like to make in EVE. Add planner on eve gate. With this structure every player can see when, the update will be ready and who work on them ( exemple balancing, pos et industry). That will be more clear for everybody.

CyberGh0st
Minmatar
Blue Republic
RvB - BLUE Republic
Posted - 2011.06.27 18:51:00 - [95]
 

Edited by: CyberGh0st on 27/06/2011 18:51:09

good stuff


PhantomOfAmarr
Posted - 2011.06.28 02:08:00 - [96]
 

Edited by: PhantomOfAmarr on 28/06/2011 02:14:48




I dont think any gun, ship or anything should buffed nerfed or any outside effect introduced as balancing. Races are not equal.

Lately there is huge effort to bring symmetry to this game. Creating static balance with obvious strategies will destroy Eve most uniq characteristic.

Leave races alone, leave ships , alone. create dynamic balance with new items and features.

We dont live in balanced world. Lets nerf US airforce planes and balance with Italian airforce. so they be in balance. Please Leave eve realistic

Please stop these stupid ideas and leave this game alone. minmatar was warrior race and it has to be stay like that.

It was worst mistake in this game to delete racial diffrences.


Obsidian Hawk
RONA Corporation
RONA Directorate
Posted - 2011.06.30 02:31:00 - [97]
 

Edited by: Obsidian Hawk on 30/06/2011 02:36:42
phantom of amarr, stop using bold and resize your text to normal stuff, cause im not going to read that.

Also, posting bold, coloured text, resized text etc, is not going to make me consider your idea.

next - as to the issues of microtransactions - i have the original MT by t-amber thread linked.

Ill work on getting the parlay thread linked a little later wed night.


EDIT - added in 2 threads for cq optional and a new thread for microtransactions.

CQ posts are in post 3.
Micro trans are in post 1 under hottest issues.

Future edits - csm stuff will be moved down later on.

Cyriel Longinus
Caldari
XERCORE
Posted - 2011.06.30 04:33:00 - [98]
 


NO

CCP does not charge extra for game expansions.
I do not support being charged extras thru micro transactions for expansions.

The description "Vanity Items" is a mislabel for expansion addons.

Those items will gain more relevance to gameplay when the development of stations environments expand to include multiplayer interactivity thru avatars rather than spaceships. It will not be called Incarna, then it will be called EVE. Avatars will become a vehicle, like spaceships, to continue exploring multilayer, multiplayer interactions as we have been doing since the universe began.


Alejan Gerakh
Minmatar
Clan Hyena

Posted - 2011.06.30 16:21:00 - [99]
 

Edited by: Alejan Gerakh on 30/06/2011 16:22:29
One thing that bothers me is the Mothership/Supercarrier issue... Personally, I dislike Mothership as a designation more than I dislike Supercarrier. They're all basically overgrown carriers, even before they overhauled them into 'Supercarriers', so some name pertaining to being a Carrier seems obvious (their bonuses were always a complete copy of the Carriers of their race, for instance, and they, of course, also use the Carrier skill- they might as well be called Tier 2 Carriers, but they are so much more impressive than a Carrier they do need to be considered their own class, so Supercarrier apparently seemed appropriate to CCP- and it is a better moniker than Mothership). Motherships, as they've said way back when, will hopefully eventually be reintroduced as a brand-new class. I've heard among my groups suggestions about making the Mothership concept into mobile manufacturing ships... though that would suggest an industrial, to be honest. Though I don't think that's too terrible an idea, either.

Vixxen Sparkledust
Amarr
Royal Amarr Institute
Posted - 2011.06.30 20:22:00 - [100]
 

I'm one of the dreaded newer players.

I'd like if Plex was completely removed from the game - it seems to encourage isk farming and character trading (which is a huge way of circumventing training time). So far it looks like players and alliances have actively spent real world money on plex, and then turned them into it into a fiscal and military advantage over other players. I find it blatantly hypocritical if the same people are bashing microtransactions. :o

I like the microtransactions, but would like them to be cheaper. I hope that nothing that is manufactured in game ends up in the exchange. I'm in favour of convenience items if they're not too pricey and aren't game breaking.

Hoping they get more fashions in the store, and that we'll be able to switch out clothes before doing dangerous stuff.

It's a pity I think, that jump freighters can't do those big jumps. Makes nullsec look less attactive. If it's true that nullsec is less valuable than it once was, that's taking some incentive to go there away too. At least in my noob opinion.

Curious if the game is going free to play with microtransactions.

Also wondering if the company is hurting during the global recession.

Regardless, hopefully there are discount days on the horizon in the Exchange.

Vixx



Alejan Gerakh
Minmatar
Clan Hyena
Posted - 2011.06.30 20:40:00 - [101]
 

Edited by: Alejan Gerakh on 30/06/2011 20:40:41
Originally by: Vixxen Sparkledust
I'm one of the dreaded newer players.

I'd like if Plex was completely removed from the game - it seems to encourage isk farming and character trading (which is a huge way of circumventing training time). So far it looks like players and alliances have actively spent real world money on plex, and then turned them into it into a fiscal and military advantage over other players. I find it blatantly hypocritical if the same people are bashing microtransactions. :o

I like the microtransactions, but would like them to be cheaper. I hope that nothing that is manufactured in game ends up in the exchange. I'm in favour of convenience items if they're not too pricey and aren't game breaking.

Hoping they get more fashions in the store, and that we'll be able to switch out clothes before doing dangerous stuff.

It's a pity I think, that jump freighters can't do those big jumps. Makes nullsec look less attactive. If it's true that nullsec is less valuable than it once was, that's taking some incentive to go there away too. At least in my noob opinion.

Curious if the game is going free to play with microtransactions.

Also wondering if the company is hurting during the global recession.

Regardless, hopefully there are discount days on the horizon in the Exchange.

Vixx

As I understood it, PLEX offers a legitimate method, where, otherwise, RMT sites and such from China or wherever would probably still find a way to farm ISK and request, through questionable channels, real money for said ISK, screwing CCP out of the extra funding and likely even the player getting fleeced.

I do agree it would be nice to remove it altogether, but I think the game actually could easily suffer more without it. I don't know for sure, but I assume there was a time when PLEX did not exist and RMT was rampant regardless.

Obsidian Hawk
RONA Corporation
RONA Directorate
Posted - 2011.07.01 00:22:00 - [102]
 

*sighs*

Guys please keep all discussions about issues to their respective threads and not in here.

This place is for updates on topics, and or suggestions for ones to be added.


kthx

Sapphire Fangborn
Gallente
Posted - 2011.07.01 03:13:00 - [103]
 

Edited by: Sapphire Fangborn on 11/07/2011 08:00:17

Suggestions:

1. Can we have a way to earn Aurim in game - via doing Loyalty faction perhaps?
2. Can we have a lottery in the Noble Exchange, on a regional basis, with a chance to win either Aurim or store fashions/Exchange items.

That's all!


Lakuma
Posted - 2011.07.13 23:44:00 - [104]
 

Ability to Strip Racks on Ships

Please add this to your list - I imagine it's along the lines of that 'little things' thread and team. I can't imagine this taking hardly any time since the functionality already exists in the game.

Obsidian Hawk
RONA Corporation
RONA Directorate
Posted - 2011.07.17 03:51:00 - [105]
 

hey guys, ill be changing up some stuff after i talk to the csm this next week. see what shoudl be removed and what will be added.

Obsidian Hawk
RONA Corporation
RONA Directorate
Posted - 2011.08.23 19:44:00 - [106]
 

Partial update

Please head over to features and ideas section here and contribute to the 0.0 stuff.


Pages: 1 2 3 [4]

This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 


The new forums are live

Please adjust your bookmarks to https://forums.eveonline.com

These forums are archived and read-only