open All Channels
seplocked Assembly Hall
blankseplocked [Proposal] API security and development priority changes
 
This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4

Author Topic

Vir Hellnamin
Gradient
Electus Matari
Posted - 2010.07.06 14:24:00 - [31]
 

Moar API (!) - or was it DPS...
(Anyways, I was promised a beer. yes? :P)

HyperBeanie
Phantom Squad
En Garde
Posted - 2010.07.06 14:24:00 - [32]
 

Good post IX, we really need something to happen soon!

/Signed

Kenpachi Viktor
Gradient
Electus Matari
Posted - 2010.07.06 14:25:00 - [33]
 

Very Happy

zys
Posted - 2010.07.06 14:58:00 - [34]
 

/signed

Theron Gyrow
Gradient
Electus Matari
Posted - 2010.07.06 18:30:00 - [35]
 

Yes.

Severin Emmeram
Minmatar
Re-Tek

Posted - 2010.07.06 20:28:00 - [36]
 

Yes please.

witchking42
Posted - 2010.07.06 22:49:00 - [37]
 

/ signed

Muscaat
EVE Markets

Posted - 2010.07.06 22:52:00 - [38]
 

Originally by: Elissen
Actually, EVE Gate should have been based on top of the API so that all functionality of EVE Gate would also be available for 3rd party developers. But yes, I agree the API needs a big overhaul and why try to invent the wheel again?


At Fanfest we were told it would be, and so we should expect the API to improve because CCP would be using it themselves...

Asura Cascade
Posted - 2010.07.06 23:04:00 - [39]
 

Agreed. Eve Gate seems very sparse. Integration plus better API support will mean this becomes a very important piece of the game. Right now it's a bit of an albatross.

Fergus Meikleour
Gallente
The Scope

Posted - 2010.07.06 23:47:00 - [40]
 

/signed

tedivm
Dreddit
Test Alliance Please Ignore
Posted - 2010.07.07 07:15:00 - [41]
 

Love it! This would make developing for eve so much better.

Irumani
Gallente
hirr
Morsus Mihi
Posted - 2010.07.07 08:31:00 - [42]
 

/signed.

I'd love to see more and more functionalities and a better integrated environnement.

Cailais
Amarr
Nasty Pope Holding Corp
Talocan United
Posted - 2010.07.07 09:01:00 - [43]
 

I support this motion.


Shirrath
Posted - 2010.07.07 09:11:00 - [44]
 

Additional API features are always welcome.

Paknac Queltel
Baden's Army

Posted - 2010.07.07 10:19:00 - [45]
 

Supported.

I'd personally like a read/write interface for Chatter, which I use quite a bit. Having to manually refresh is getting annoying.

Having to write a scraper just to get update notification would be annoying - even moreso if such a tool can't be shared because it needs account login credentials.

C'mon CCP, let us make and share beautiful tools.

Ferrus Manuss
Posted - 2010.07.07 10:37:00 - [46]
 

FOR GREAT JUSTICE

gunnar aztek
Gallente
Posted - 2010.07.07 12:24:00 - [47]
 

supported

Aevum Decessus
Posted - 2010.07.07 12:29:00 - [48]
 

this is a great idea

Rokkit Kween
Posted - 2010.07.07 12:34:00 - [49]
 

The use of M$ backends on the website and frums has been the problem since the beginning. Social networks only work if you can actually connect them to stuff, you can't have a social network that is insular and isolated from the rest of the internet. It just doesn't work.


PyjamaSam
Minmatar
Vanguard Frontiers
Intrepid Crossing
Posted - 2010.07.07 13:21:00 - [50]
 

/Signed.

chris.

Cpl Feld
Posted - 2010.07.07 14:50:00 - [51]
 

/signed

Elissen
Amarr
Viziam
Posted - 2010.07.07 15:09:00 - [52]
 

Originally by: Muscaat
Originally by: Elissen
Actually, EVE Gate should have been based on top of the API so that all functionality of EVE Gate would also be available for 3rd party developers. But yes, I agree the API needs a big overhaul and why try to invent the wheel again?


At Fanfest we were told it would be, and so we should expect the API to improve because CCP would be using it themselves...


I know, I was at that roundtable myself. However, my gut feeling says they did not.

Franklen
Gallente
Noir.
Posted - 2010.07.07 16:31:00 - [53]
 

/signed

Rockhart
Posted - 2010.07.07 17:08:00 - [54]
 

I support this initiative.

Squizz Caphinator
Woopatang

Posted - 2010.07.07 17:19:00 - [55]
 

+3 internets for Ix Forres

or a simple thumbs up for support will do

Kandrew Dorak
Gallente
The Graduates
Morsus Mihi
Posted - 2010.07.07 20:04:00 - [56]
 

/signed

Galideeth
Gallente
Starkstrom
Initiative Mercenaries
Posted - 2010.07.08 11:27:00 - [57]
 

yes, please!

Mynxee
Veto.
Veto Corp
Posted - 2010.07.08 14:53:00 - [58]
 

Players have consistently shown talent and insight in developing useful, elegant third party apps for EVE. The same brain-trust turned loose on EVEGate would be most welcome.

+1 Supported.



Marcel Devereux
Aideron Robotics
Posted - 2010.07.08 16:28:00 - [59]
 

Supported.

mazzilliu
Caldari
Sniggerdly
Pandemic Legion
Posted - 2010.07.08 18:18:00 - [60]
 

Edited by: mazzilliu on 08/07/2010 18:17:44
if mynxee doesnt raise it as a csm issue i will.


Pages: 1 [2] 3 4

This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 


The new forums are live

Please adjust your bookmarks to https://forums.eveonline.com

These forums are archived and read-only