open All Channels
seplocked Assembly Hall
blankseplocked [Proposal] Make Motherships Larger
 
This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 
Pages: first : previous : ... 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 : last (10)

Author Topic

McFly
Peanut Factory
Posted - 2011.04.12 17:13:00 - [241]
 

Edited by: McFly on 12/04/2011 17:12:57
I think it's hilarious that my Machariel is almost bigger than my archon, and my archon is only marginally shorter than my nyx.

xxxak
Caldari
Intergalactic Syndicate
Nulli Secunda
Posted - 2011.04.12 23:06:00 - [242]
 

Supported

Mara Tyrano
Posted - 2011.04.13 01:47:00 - [243]
 

...

Ganthrithor
Caldari
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
Posted - 2011.04.13 04:11:00 - [244]
 

Edited by: Ganthrithor on 13/04/2011 04:15:25
Make them bigger. Supercarrier, though, is a fine name. "Assault Carrier" just reminds me of this ( http://www.miqel.com/images_1/random_image/r1/banana-assault-advert.gif )


Regular carriers could use a little scaling-up as well.

Kaos Soldier
Posted - 2011.04.13 11:38:00 - [245]
 

I'll support this because realismExclamation is affected by this class's model size.

LordElfa
Gallente
Golden Lyon Warriors
Posted - 2011.04.13 20:41:00 - [246]
 

I'm sensing a lot of pee-pee size insecurity in this thread. Say it ain't so guys?


A man shall not be judged by the size of his ship, but by the content of his carrier!

EnthusiGASM
Posted - 2011.04.14 03:52:00 - [247]
 


Calathea Sata
State War Academy
Posted - 2011.04.14 16:04:00 - [248]
 

+1 for true sizes of ships

Kiev Duran
Caldari
Retribution. Inc.
Strategic Operations Brigade
Posted - 2011.04.15 18:04:00 - [249]
 

Yes.

The Mittani
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
Posted - 2011.04.16 05:38:00 - [250]
 

both the name 'supercarrier' is stupid as balls and they're too small, i agree

however this is pretty hilariously low priority. i can throw it in our 'ship models and paint' summit topic though and hope for the best. it might be an easy fix, i have no idea how model scaling works! cross your fingers

'assault carriers' ain't bad, mothership would have been fine, supercarrier is terrible

Elena Stormbringer
hirr
Morsus Mihi
Posted - 2011.04.16 15:51:00 - [251]
 

Yes.

Azurun Li
Posted - 2011.04.21 20:28:00 - [252]
 

I support this product and/or service.

Tar Omrir
Posted - 2011.04.22 01:28:00 - [253]
 

two things.

A. THIS IS REDICLOUS. make them bigger. the name isnt bad but there need to be serious changes to make it fit.
B. make assault carriers current supercarriers into a TII version with better logistcs. this could also solve the titan problem. TII titan logistics TI damge.. TIII moble jump bridge with ok weppons.
i support

Aurum Gallente
Posted - 2011.05.07 11:25:00 - [254]
 

why do atron's(ares\taranis) weapons fastened nothing to him? it's pity

Cold32
The Alpha and the Omega

Posted - 2011.05.07 17:39:00 - [255]
 

I like it big

Swynet
State War Academy

Posted - 2011.05.11 14:10:00 - [256]
 

Ladies will agree, bigger it is better it is.

Supported

Visione
Amarr
VM Labs
Quo Vadis.
Posted - 2011.05.15 18:58:00 - [257]
 

supported.

and if CCP is looking at rebalancing ship sizes they shouldn't only look at supercarriers.
yes the supercarriers are the best example, but there are allot of ships with a weird sizes, my golem is like as big as my harbinger...

greetings Visione

Godfroi
Righteous-Indignation

Posted - 2011.05.15 21:35:00 - [258]
 

Supported if the Nidhoggur gets on the list as well.

Illamain
Caldari
ANZAC ALLIANCE
RAZOR Alliance
Posted - 2011.05.17 00:13:00 - [259]
 

If you own a sc or have ever had the "Bad touch" put on you by one, support this!

Maksim Cammeren
Posted - 2011.05.18 01:01:00 - [260]
 

Posting in a size enhancement thread to confirm that size does matter.

Kryppers
Posted - 2011.05.18 10:30:00 - [261]
 

Can anyone confirm that CCP are updating the ship graphics soon? I suspect I may have seen pictures of the new textures in a thread alongside the proposed ship paintjobs and corp logos.

If that were the case, they could scale the ships in the same patch as the new graphics (presumably designed to fit the new size) and not have to worry about blurred texture scaling.

Hirana Yoshida
Behavioral Affront

Posted - 2011.05.18 12:25:00 - [262]
 

Not only should they be larger, but their collision boxes should be increased as well.

Looks impressive when 40+ (or however large a SC roam is these days Smile) drop out at a single cyno but dammit, they should be bouncing all over the damn place when that many drop in around one point in space (would act a nice balancing feature as well).

Ciryath Al'Darion
FinFleet
Raiden.
Posted - 2011.05.20 21:47:00 - [263]
 

Idea is nice on paper, but silly in eve. Big ships are horribly bad to manouver around anything, since due some game mechanic, range from ship is calculated differently from the bumbing mechanic. You can be like 4kilometers from object, but cannot approach it anymore, since some imaginary boundary is already touching it (even though gfx is not).

For example big ships like ragnarok cannot directly approach ship maintenance array on a pos, because the ship gets bumbed by the ship maintenance before its in range.

Also you can fit like one titan (gfx wise) between two titans, but still the two titans are 0m from each other.

If game would handle bumbs and ship boundaries correctly, bigger size would be nice.

With the current mechanics, no.

Kaelie Onren
Minmatar
Posted - 2011.05.21 05:27:00 - [264]
 

Originally by: Calathea Sata
+1 for true sizes of ships


What does this mean? True sizes?
If this is a make it bigger because it will look cooler, not supported.
The ship sizes were designed that way for reasons ( I don't know what they are, but unless the art direction team at ccp was drunk when they decided the sizes, there must be reasons why. )

A reason of " because it looks cooler " is not going to cut it as justification alone.

Simc0m
Posted - 2011.05.23 00:41:00 - [265]
 

supported, make them bigger. make normal carriers bigger as well.

Dr Screamm
Gallente
Posted - 2011.05.25 14:39:00 - [266]
 

I TOTALLY agree. SCALE is completely WRONG in-game, when my NYX shows up i often have to zoom into it in large fleets of non supers because as others have pointed out, there are BS and carriers which are " almost " the same size when large ships are gathered in close range....
Allow me also to point out that tiny ships are allowed to bump what is MEANT TO BE a humangous ship!!!!

BLACK-STAR
Posted - 2011.05.25 16:43:00 - [267]
 

currently the rifter's design is too small to accommodate the pod. there looks like a bridge where a human pilot would be, but compared side by side the pod would breach the hull of the rifter.

All ships need a scale fix YARRRR!!

Erus Fatum
Posted - 2011.05.25 20:23:00 - [268]
 

/signed

Cyberus
Caldari
Red Federation
RvB - RED Federation
Posted - 2011.05.25 22:08:00 - [269]
 

Do you know what noob's ask for the first time when they see SC?

"How the **** my MOA will fit in it shipmaintain bay? It it way too small!"

So i completely agree on this one.


+1

Peregrine
Posted - 2011.05.26 07:09:00 - [270]
 

plus one for da goons idea


Pages: first : previous : ... 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 : last (10)

This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 


The new forums are live

Please adjust your bookmarks to https://forums.eveonline.com

These forums are archived and read-only