open All Channels
seplocked Assembly Hall
blankseplocked [Proposal] CCP, commit to excellence. No features left behind.
This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.

Pages: first : previous : ... 20 21 22 23 [24] 25 26 27 28 ... : last (98)

Author Topic

Posted - 2010.06.01 16:30:00 - [691]

Edited by: Alelsa on 01/06/2010 16:31:30
Originally by: Dierdra Vaal

Is CCP's frantic release schedule to blame?
Are 6 months really enough time to develop new features AND improve old features AND fix bugs? While it is awesome to get two free expansions a year, isn't CCP risking quality in order to maintain quantity? Perhaps a release schedule of 9 months per expansion (so 2 expansions every year and half) will give them more time to develop existing features into Excellence, as well as developing new features into a good release-ready state.


I would probably add a suggestion (apologies if I'm repeating something from the previous 30 pages I haven't read) that the 6-monthly expansions stay, but alternate between "new content" releases and "improving existing content" releases rather than constantly focusing on releasing half-built-and-then-forgotten systems.

Ron Berry
Posted - 2010.06.01 16:32:00 - [692]

I support this.

The Tuskers
Posted - 2010.06.01 16:37:00 - [693]


Whacky Waving Inflatable Flailing Arm Tubemen

Posted - 2010.06.01 16:41:00 - [694]

Yes Yes Yes A million times YES. I cannot support the op enough.

The Unforgettables
Talos Coalition
Posted - 2010.06.01 16:44:00 - [695]

i support this

Gris X
Posted - 2010.06.01 16:46:00 - [696]

please add bounty hunting rules to the list of features that do require an upgrade to excellence. they are currently not even good or ok,but just terrible and poorly thought out.

Nymeria Snow
Posted - 2010.06.01 16:57:00 - [697]

Posted - 2010.06.01 16:57:00 - [698]


Martyr's Vengence
Test Alliance Please Ignore
Posted - 2010.06.01 17:03:00 - [699]

CCP is risking making the same mistakes that Mythic did with Warhammer Online.
The constant addition of NEW features while the bugs and issues with the OLD Features remain.
While new Content will add users, you will eventually lose both the newer players and older mainstay customers. There needs to be more improvement on the Issues that Exist NOW and less time/effort/money spent on adding even more features that will require even more work to correct.
I think of Eve as a House. The Foundation is Solid, but has cracks in it. Lets Fix that Foundation befor we add more improvements that we really don't need, but will raise the value of the house.

The Praxis Initiative
Gentlemen's Agreement
Posted - 2010.06.01 17:04:00 - [700]

Very definite +1 from me. It is getting increasingly hard to defend the attitude to this problem shown by CCP.

Some recent posts on this forum by certain devs have been frankly rude and insulting to fans who are only trying to help them make a better game, something they claim to believe in wholeheartedly.

Posted - 2010.06.01 17:05:00 - [701]

Edited by: payLow on 01/06/2010 17:21:58
You wouldnt believe how much I loved CCP if they fixed the issues at hand. I mean Eve is already my favorite MMO but with more excellence I would basically never stop playing it...

Yes please!

Balderfrey Enterprises
Posted - 2010.06.01 17:13:00 - [702]

Supported. Please CCP, don't half ass planetary interaction like you did some of the other older features. I want to see the SimCity style content that was advertised years ago.

Weegie Miso
Minmatar Ship Construction Services
Posted - 2010.06.01 17:14:00 - [703]


Jack Wildstar
Minmatar Ship Construction Services
Posted - 2010.06.01 17:15:00 - [704]

Fantastic idea Dierdra. Their goal is excellence, they need to be held to that standard.

I love Eve, but it can be better. Time to focus on the things that need to be addressed, rather than racing expansions out to get the game to a certain place. If it takes longer to arrive, but arrives in supreme shape, instead of full of bugs, it will be better for your player base, as well as your company's reputation.

Meilan Khan
Posted - 2010.06.01 17:18:00 - [705]


Kirsty CarpetMuncher
Posted - 2010.06.01 17:18:00 - [706]


Posted - 2010.06.01 17:24:00 - [707]


Kaldor Mintat
Adhocracy Incorporated

Posted - 2010.06.01 17:29:00 - [708]


Shadow of xXDEATHXx
Posted - 2010.06.01 17:29:00 - [709]

Threadnaught status.

Supported. Time for EVE to HTFU.

Posted - 2010.06.01 17:30:00 - [710]


9 month releases is more than enough and makes more time for QUALITY. To be honest I would rather see only 1 expansion per year as long as:

- there are minor bug fixes/releases on regular basis to fix known issues
- the expansion is tested alot and input's from players on forums and the testserver are being taken seriously

Make it so...ENGAGE!

Posted - 2010.06.01 17:32:00 - [711]

Posted - 2010.06.01 17:35:00 - [712]

Posted - 2010.06.01 17:38:00 - [713]

Supported. Expansion every 9 months, or even a year, can only lead to better overall expansions and quality control.

Alekseyev Karrde
Noir. Mercenary Group
Posted - 2010.06.01 17:39:00 - [714]

Said it on the campaign, said it in Iceland, and it deserves saying again till CCP gets the message

Janet Hendrix
Posted - 2010.06.01 17:39:00 - [715]


Ellerie Darko
Posted - 2010.06.01 17:40:00 - [716]


Matah Hari
Posted - 2010.06.01 17:40:00 - [717]

agreed and supported.
lets make this proposal heard!

Rote Kapelle
Posted - 2010.06.01 17:47:00 - [718]

Absolutely. Needs more integration between FW and the rest of EVE

Posted - 2010.06.01 17:48:00 - [719]

Quality > Quantity.


Tora Ferenoth
RAZOR Alliance
Posted - 2010.06.01 17:51:00 - [720]


Pages: first : previous : ... 20 21 22 23 [24] 25 26 27 28 ... : last (98)

This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


The new forums are live

Please adjust your bookmarks to

These forums are archived and read-only