open All Channels
seplocked Assembly Hall
blankseplocked [Proposal] CCP, commit to excellence. No features left behind.
 
This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 
Pages: first : previous : ... 17 18 19 20 [21] 22 23 24 25 ... : last (98)

Author Topic

Ivanna Nuke
Gallente
Holders Of The Cowbell

Posted - 2010.06.01 12:07:00 - [601]
 

Supporting this along with a farm of cowbell, and two turnip overlords of the fruited garlic bread.Cool

Lloydz
Chevaliers de la Croix Du Sud

Posted - 2010.06.01 12:08:00 - [602]
 

I can has grid when I jump ?

zornn alruior
Gallente
ICE is Coming to EVE
Goonswarm Federation
Posted - 2010.06.01 12:10:00 - [603]
 

+1

Roter Baron
Evoke.
Ev0ke
Posted - 2010.06.01 12:11:00 - [604]
 

+1

Lalwende
Posted - 2010.06.01 12:11:00 - [605]
 

+1

Daedalus II
Helios Research
Posted - 2010.06.01 12:12:00 - [606]
 

Support.

(A forum where you don't have to login twice every time could be nice as well)

Sojourner Zen
Amarr
Hedion University
Posted - 2010.06.01 12:24:00 - [607]
 

/Agreed!

Zhalakin
Destructive Influence

Posted - 2010.06.01 12:26:00 - [608]
 

Support

Del Mare
FrEE d00M Fighters
Grunts.
Posted - 2010.06.01 12:26:00 - [609]
 

Supported

Lelouch DeGilead
Amarr
Elanus Risk Control
Cognitive Distortion
Posted - 2010.06.01 12:27:00 - [610]
 

+1

Joe SMASH
You Got A Purty Mouth
Posted - 2010.06.01 12:28:00 - [611]
 

Signed

Ellowenn
Posted - 2010.06.01 12:31:00 - [612]
 

+1

Eshnala
Muppet Ninja's
Ninja Unicorns with Huge Horns
Posted - 2010.06.01 12:32:00 - [613]
 

/signed

Grimpak
Gallente
Midnight Elites
Echelon Rising
Posted - 2010.06.01 12:34:00 - [614]
 

while I do agree totally on this thread, it must be taken into account that rehashing doesn't bring more new players (thus revenue) than new content.

I do agree however that CCP usually follows the "implement now, develop later" meme. I would try to search for a middleground for it, with expansions having half time dedicated for new content and half time dedicated on developing new content, sacrificing for that the 6-month expansion release cycles if needed. I would much prefer CCP to release 1 expansion every year and do try to improve such expansion in a year's time.


in sum, I support this thread, but people must take into consideration that this is business.

Roastedpot
Noir.
Noir. Mercenary Group
Posted - 2010.06.01 12:40:00 - [615]
 

o/

Rocket Dog
Minmatar
Posted - 2010.06.01 12:46:00 - [616]
 

+1

Yasuhiro Shoe
Caldari
Fighters Squadron
Tactical Narcotics Team
Posted - 2010.06.01 12:46:00 - [617]
 

Sorry, I disagree with the assumption that slower releases would bring better release quality.

It's just not true.

I also believe that two major releases a year, keep more players interested (and attract more new/returning players) than revisions and fixes would.

CCP is doing the math and their reasoning for keeping this schedule is sound. It's making Eve more successful than it otherwise would be. And so they should keep at it.

Asking for excellence, better testing, more resources to old projects, minor improvements: that's just common sense. But doing that at the expense of expansions: it is detrimental and possibly suicidal. Hopefully CCP won't listen to this one advice.

My own 0.02 isk, which I won't be giving to anyone anyway.

But I did vote for you Dierdra.

Raceleader
Minmatar
Epsilon Lyr
BPLAN
Posted - 2010.06.01 12:48:00 - [618]
 

/Signed

Im paying for 3 accounts, and want quality over quantity

Lord Helghast
Posted - 2010.06.01 12:51:00 - [619]
 

SIGNED

Jager Da
Gallente
The Tuskers

Posted - 2010.06.01 12:52:00 - [620]
 

Supported. Time to fix things, CCP.

Illianos
Epsilon Lyr
Posted - 2010.06.01 13:01:00 - [621]
 

Quality > Quantity.

/supported

no more lag in 0.0 space

Mistress Templar
Posted - 2010.06.01 13:03:00 - [622]
 


Doc Deeb
Posted - 2010.06.01 13:04:00 - [623]
 


Mistress YO
Posted - 2010.06.01 13:05:00 - [624]
 

+1

Sydious
Amarr
Suburban Tea Party

Posted - 2010.06.01 13:05:00 - [625]
 

I would like this to go as far as dedicating one of the 3 dev teams to feature updates and fixes for an expansion or two till the backlog is cleared out.

InToFace
Posted - 2010.06.01 13:06:00 - [626]
 

Supported, but for some reason I really will be surprised if CCP pay any attention to it.Rolling Eyes

Terrorisma
Cataclysm Enterprises
Ev0ke
Posted - 2010.06.01 13:07:00 - [627]
 

+1

Jap Bookmarker
Minmatar
The Wanderers
Posted - 2010.06.01 13:07:00 - [628]
 

+1

NightmareX
Nomads
Nulli Secunda
Posted - 2010.06.01 13:07:00 - [629]
 

Edited by: NightmareX on 01/06/2010 13:09:13
Originally by: Yasuhiro Shoe
Sorry, I disagree with the assumption that slower releases would bring better release quality.

It's just not true.

I also believe that two major releases a year, keep more players interested (and attract more new/returning players) than revisions and fixes would.

CCP is doing the math and their reasoning for keeping this schedule is sound. It's making Eve more successful than it otherwise would be. And so they should keep at it.

Asking for excellence, better testing, more resources to old projects, minor improvements: that's just common sense. But doing that at the expense of expansions: it is detrimental and possibly suicidal. Hopefully CCP won't listen to this one advice.

My own 0.02 isk, which I won't be giving to anyone anyway.

But I did vote for you Dierdra.


So you rather have half-finished products / features in EVE that have tons of bugs just to get more players intrested and to get more players into EVE faster?.

I think it's better to use more time to get the things totally done and release it with almost no bugs so the new players that comes to eve can rather enjoy EVE instead of leaving in anger because things in EVE doesn't work like it should and because it contains with tons of bugs.

No, CCP should use more time to make sure that the new features they release is 99% finished and have minimum with bugs when they release new things. So there can be alot more happy players.

Because you know, having a working game is 39845763982 times more important than getting some few more players intrested faster.

If EVE had been WoW, then i could agree that getting more players really fast would be an idea, but this is EVE we are talking about here.

Ethan Hawk
SniggWaffe

Posted - 2010.06.01 13:07:00 - [630]
 

+1


Pages: first : previous : ... 17 18 19 20 [21] 22 23 24 25 ... : last (98)

This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 


The new forums are live

Please adjust your bookmarks to https://forums.eveonline.com

These forums are archived and read-only