open All Channels
seplocked Assembly Hall
blankseplocked [Proposal] CCP, commit to excellence. No features left behind.
 
This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 
Pages: first : previous : ... 16 17 18 19 [20] 21 22 23 24 ... : last (98)

Author Topic

krakinette
Caldari
Epsilon Lyr
BPLAN
Posted - 2010.06.01 10:34:00 - [571]
 

+1

fixed lag

Miraki Alsento
Nutz N Boltz

Posted - 2010.06.01 10:34:00 - [572]
 

+1

Eugene Roserie
Strategic Naval Research Institute
ANAHEIM ELECTRONICS Alliance
Posted - 2010.06.01 10:40:00 - [573]
 

I'd rather like to see existing features are refined and polished.

jattell
Gallente
Celestial Horizon Corp.
United Corporate Ventures
Posted - 2010.06.01 10:41:00 - [574]
 

+1


Derus Grobb
Minmatar
Selectus Pravus Lupus
Transmission Lost
Posted - 2010.06.01 10:44:00 - [575]
 

Totally support this.

Lifinity
Posted - 2010.06.01 10:48:00 - [576]
 

supported!

Tanare
Posted - 2010.06.01 10:55:00 - [577]
 

Edited by: Tanare on 01/06/2010 18:54:42

Edited by: Tanare on 01/06/2010 18:51:34
+1
Quality > quantity

NightmareX
Nomads
Nulli Secunda
Posted - 2010.06.01 11:01:00 - [578]
 

I have no other options than just supporting this.

Best proposal in a very long time here.

Tolrok Qorte
Minmatar
The Red Pill Taker Group
Talocan United
Posted - 2010.06.01 11:04:00 - [579]
 

I absolutely agree. +1

Mental Mantis
Agony Unleashed
Posted - 2010.06.01 11:08:00 - [580]
 

+1
for more time spent on features and better quality practices.

Maki Nomiya
Caldari
Posted - 2010.06.01 11:08:00 - [581]
 

YES! Fix first ... no more FUBAR !
That pesky camera reset on jumping or other session change has come back to annoy us far too many times now (to name one of a few fav features™) !!

And slideshow non-interactive EVE sux !Evil or Very Mad

Laika Dorfmeister
Posted - 2010.06.01 11:08:00 - [582]
 

+1

zzzDeXoNzzz
Posted - 2010.06.01 11:15:00 - [583]
 

+1

Mynxee
Veto.
Veto Corp
Posted - 2010.06.01 11:17:00 - [584]
 

Excellently stated, Dierdra! Wink

Unless CCP commit to a change--or many changes--in the way they approach the management of releases, I fear EVE will simply become too fractured to maintain in any significant way over time. Besides the release of half-baked features, I'm also concerned about wasted resources when nearly-done features are scrapped because they weren't 100% finished by some artificial deadline. If the time, effort, and expense to get a feature to 85% or 90% is invested, then it's worth staying on track and taking the time needed to finish it. I suspect players will happily support "missed deadlines" (look at the positive response when Tyrannis got delayed; what happened when it did get released is another story)--especially if it means they get a better product.

In my view, part of a commitment to excellence must include a commitment to extending release dates realistically when doing so will result in a more robust feature set. Related to that, the investment in nearly-done features should be leveraged by allowing work to continue past deadlines so that the feature can be finished. It can then be deployed in a patch or next release. Scrapping features that already have significant investment should be a rare exception, not the rule. Any development model that demands slavish devotion to the latter is fiscally insane, not to mention dangerously demoralizing to development teams and ultimately hugely disappointing to customers.

Faridi Dem
Brothers of Destiny
Phobia.
Posted - 2010.06.01 11:18:00 - [585]
 

supported!

Vitelius
Black Nova Corp
IT Alliance
Posted - 2010.06.01 11:21:00 - [586]
 

Most definitely supported.

V0n Braun
Federal Defence Union
Posted - 2010.06.01 11:27:00 - [587]
 

+1

complete support

Rokkit Kween
Posted - 2010.06.01 11:28:00 - [588]
 

yes yes yes. to all points raised.

Release schedule too tight, loosen it up a bit.

Keep working on content after release rather than leaving it to gather dust.

no more new shinies till Incarna.

Muscaat
EVE Markets

Posted - 2010.06.01 11:32:00 - [589]
 

DV, every single word you said is true.

+1

Nomi S
Free-Space-Ranger
Morsus Mihi
Posted - 2010.06.01 11:34:00 - [590]
 


Quetzalcoatl III
Gallente
EVE University
Ivy League
Posted - 2010.06.01 11:35:00 - [591]
 

I'm with you

Thyza
Posted - 2010.06.01 11:36:00 - [592]
 

agreed.
especially on treaties, they would make renting out 0.0 so much easier.

Draconder
Posted - 2010.06.01 11:37:00 - [593]
 

You have my vote on this.

Klame
ICE is Coming to EVE
Tau Ceti Federation
Posted - 2010.06.01 11:44:00 - [594]
 

/signed

Quivering Palm
Caldari
SI Radio
Split Infinity.
Posted - 2010.06.01 11:50:00 - [595]
 

Agreed ofc.

More to that, it would be great if CCP chooses to implement what the CSM have been suggesting for the past years. Lots of great ideas and proposals, but really how many make them into the patch notes in each expansion?

Rutilus
Posted - 2010.06.01 11:53:00 - [596]
 

Hear, hear. I love this game and I want to see it Be Excellent. Less Microsoft-esque "let our paying customers beta-test the products" and more "hammer the issues out fully on Sisi, even if it means releasing late."

Patri Andari
Caldari
Thukker Tribe Antiquities Importer

Posted - 2010.06.01 11:54:00 - [597]
 

+1

dermannmitdemkoks
Posted - 2010.06.01 12:00:00 - [598]
 

+1
definately supported
its about time Neutral

Shardivh
Posted - 2010.06.01 12:03:00 - [599]
 

Supported and really agree with the 1 "major new shiny features" expansion and 1 "fix/revise old content" expansion per year instead of what we have now. CCP, please commit to excellence!

Bucky O'Hair
Minmatar
Minmatar Ship Construction Services
Ushra'Khan
Posted - 2010.06.01 12:04:00 - [600]
 

I support this! Please put a freeze on future expansions, and fix the current ones!


Pages: first : previous : ... 16 17 18 19 [20] 21 22 23 24 ... : last (98)

This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 


The new forums are live

Please adjust your bookmarks to https://forums.eveonline.com

These forums are archived and read-only