open All Channels
seplocked Assembly Hall
blankseplocked [ISSUE] Removal of deep safes
 
This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 
Pages: first : previous : ... 12 13 14 15 [16] 17 18 19 20 ... : last (21)

Author Topic

Brian Khan
Amarr
StarHunt
R.A.G.E
Posted - 2010.04.14 17:42:00 - [451]
 


Doris Dragonbreath
StarHunt
R.A.G.E
Posted - 2010.04.14 17:42:00 - [452]
 


Mia Silverfang
Posted - 2010.04.14 17:43:00 - [453]
 

I want my deep safes.

Vlad Wormwing
StarHunt
R.A.G.E
Posted - 2010.04.14 17:43:00 - [454]
 

Not my deep safes.

Li Freeman
Posted - 2010.04.14 17:43:00 - [455]
 


Linda Dreamwalker
Posted - 2010.04.14 17:44:00 - [456]
 


Kaarnakivi
Posted - 2010.04.14 17:44:00 - [457]
 


NeutronRonk
Posted - 2010.04.14 17:45:00 - [458]
 


Tehnomaag
StarHunt
R.A.G.E
Posted - 2010.04.14 17:45:00 - [459]
 

I agree. We need deep safes in sov warfare and if needed alternative method of creating them should be introduced.

Orree
Shiva
Morsus Mihi
Posted - 2010.04.14 17:51:00 - [460]
 

Supported.



Amberlamps
Posted - 2010.04.14 17:54:00 - [461]
 

Abso****inglutely signed, confining the "Sandbox" to a Palm full of sand just isn't cool. Keeping in mind that they have countered logoffski warps it will be impossible to reach behind the 10AU spots so realistically there will only be a handful of players who have bookmarks behind the stargates and planets making it EXTREMELY unbalanced as a handful of players will have ~10au bookmarks from celestials whereas the vast majority of the player base will not have.

Keeping in mind that it is perfectly viable for anyone at the current state TQ is at to make their own "Deep safe spots" and it isn't that hard to probe out to a few hundred AU with Deep safe probes. CCP should take a different apporach to solving problems rather than listening to the first thing "Nerfoper" otherwise know as a "CCP Developer" puts on the table. It's the easy way out everytime and I for one am getting ****ing sick of it.

Similar to minerals worth crap all... instead of killing off the masses of macro miners they nerf missions.

Get your act together CCP


Firvain
Wildly Inappropriate
Goonswarm Federation
Posted - 2010.04.14 18:02:00 - [462]
 

signed!

wiersma
Caldari
Dark Matter Systems
Posted - 2010.04.14 18:05:00 - [463]
 

I support

keep deep space safe spots alive, dont limit the sandbox.Evil or Very Mad

Arboreal Feline
The Scope
Posted - 2010.04.14 18:07:00 - [464]
 

/me Supports the topic in the face.

Atius Shinkan
UK Corp
-Mostly Harmless-
Posted - 2010.04.14 18:33:00 - [465]
 

Damn! Keep the deepsafe's and work on a probe solutions instead.

Give use more challenges not limit them!

Joo Joobee
Posted - 2010.04.14 18:59:00 - [466]
 

I do not support this topic. Deep safes are a special defect that have been exploited for far too long in this game.

Learn to play in the same sandbox as everyone else, rather than use exploits to your personal advantage.

Amberlamps
Posted - 2010.04.14 19:14:00 - [467]
 

Originally by: Joo Joobee
I do not support this topic. Deep safes are a special defect that have been exploited for far too long in this game.

Learn to play in the same sandbox as everyone else, rather than use exploits to your personal advantage.


Everyone else is able to make deepsafe spots so its not a personal or even a corporation wide advantage. Everyone can make currently make them... learn to do so and you can even make them in an Orca.

Meluria Deshin
Posted - 2010.04.14 19:34:00 - [468]
 

Support

Mulara Miran
Posted - 2010.04.14 19:34:00 - [469]
 

support

Akirad Deshin
Amarr
Free-Space-Ranger
Posted - 2010.04.14 19:35:00 - [470]
 


Sandra Yates
Minmatar
Free-Space-Ranger
Morsus Mihi
Posted - 2010.04.14 19:36:00 - [471]
 

agreed

Aloma Deshin
Posted - 2010.04.14 19:36:00 - [472]
 


Yuniko Karisei
Posted - 2010.04.14 19:37:00 - [473]
 


XT 290
Posted - 2010.04.14 19:37:00 - [474]
 

/signed

XT 280
Posted - 2010.04.14 19:38:00 - [475]
 


Illrean
Posted - 2010.04.14 19:40:00 - [476]
 

Originally by: TeaDaze
A recent dev blog stated that deep safes are going to be removed along with any items outside this new "Wall".


We the undersigned disagree with the planned removal of existing deep safes (and related destruction of property) and request that CCP re-evaluate this decision with input from the players.


Alternative methods for finding deep safes etc can be discussed, but the focus here is to show CCP that the players disagree with further limiting the sandbox.


Please reply to this thread and tick the "support this topic" box to register your dissatisfaction.


You put two issues here one of which I support and the other I can't.

I am against the destruction of floating property, however, due to the questionable means used to create Poseidon Deep Safes I have to agree with their removal. I would also bet there are data base issues involved, EVE star systems are big, but every game has to set game field boundaries.

XT 270
Posted - 2010.04.14 19:40:00 - [477]
 


XT 3489
Posted - 2010.04.14 19:43:00 - [478]
 


Cpt Iwan
4S Corporation
Morsus Mihi
Posted - 2010.04.14 19:53:00 - [479]
 

signed

SmokeyUK
Gallente
Shiva
Morsus Mihi
Posted - 2010.04.14 20:00:00 - [480]
 

/signed


Pages: first : previous : ... 12 13 14 15 [16] 17 18 19 20 ... : last (21)

This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 


The new forums are live

Please adjust your bookmarks to https://forums.eveonline.com

These forums are archived and read-only