open All Channels
seplocked Science and Industry
blankseplocked Corporate roles to operate a polymer reaktor
 
This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 
Author Topic

Flair Firestar
Posted - 2010.02.07 09:41:00 - [1]
 

Our corp recently installed a second pos in our wormhole to do polymer reaktions.

One of our members now wants to use one of the two reaktors (polymer reactor and the corresponding 4 silos).
Since we would like to limit the "config starbase equipment" role to directors for security reasons. (the main pos would be vulnerable to anyone with that role)
Our solution has been to set the reaktor tower to allow onlining/offlining for the starbase fuel technician role.
However we ran into the problem that the fuel technician can use the reaktor as is. But when he needs to do a different reaktion he gets an error message telling him that the "config starbase equipment" role is needed to change the silo types to a different mineral/polymer/gas.

Is there any option to allow that without the config starbase role?
On another note, can online/offline acess be restricted to certain modules? Or can it only be done to the pos as a whole?

JitaPriceChecker2
Posted - 2010.02.07 10:32:00 - [2]
 

I have run into the same problem , found no solution.

Emporer Norton
Posted - 2010.02.07 18:09:00 - [3]
 

Best solution would be for that person to setup an alt account only need corp management 1 and anchoring 3 then can setup there own pos however they want depending on modules can be over 500 million isk though for a large tower other then that they would need the roles and that just depends on how much you trust them

Flair Firestar
Posted - 2010.02.08 17:08:00 - [4]
 

Oh well. I was hoping for a more elegant solution.
That will mean he will have to call a director when he changes reaktions.

Agent Unknown
Caldari
Posted - 2010.02.08 21:24:00 - [5]
 

Can you set the silos to "starbase fuel technician" for use/take/offline/online as well?

Flair Firestar
Posted - 2010.02.09 08:42:00 - [6]
 

Thatīs what we did. However changing the contents of a silo (c28 to c32 for example) we still get the tower complaining that "config starbase equipent role" is needed.

Jack Sabastian
Posted - 2010.02.11 11:04:00 - [7]
 

I'm not sure how pratical this will be in your case but put up one one silo for each reactant? That way he doesn't have to change the silos type, just online the correct silos and he's golden.

It's not too many for all polymer reactions. 9 Fullerites, 9 hybrid polymers, and 7 miniral is only 25 silos.

It's one way to do it.

JitaPriceChecker2
Posted - 2010.02.11 12:33:00 - [8]
 

Originally by: Jack Sabastian
I'm not sure how pratical this will be in your case but put up one one silo for each reactant? That way he doesn't have to change the silos type, just online the correct silos and he's golden.

It's not too many for all polymer reactions. 9 Fullerites, 9 hybrid polymers, and 7 miniral is only 25 silos.

It's one way to do it.


You still need config starbase to change reaction it self. Do you suggest to him to anchor 9 reactors as well ?

Jack Sabastian
Posted - 2010.02.12 09:40:00 - [9]
 

Originally by: JitaPriceChecker2
Originally by: Jack Sabastian
...


You still need config starbase to change reaction it self. Do you suggest to him to anchor 9 reactors as well ?


See that I didn't know, well that blows that plan out of the water. It was just an out of the box I idea thought of that might help.

Flair Firestar
Posted - 2010.02.12 11:40:00 - [10]
 

Itīs still a working Idea.

The downside is the massive blob of silos it creates.
Weīll stay with the "call director" solution for the time being. As nobody would volunteer to haul all those extra structures into our wormhole.


 

This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 


The new forums are live

Please adjust your bookmarks to https://forums.eveonline.com

These forums are archived and read-only