Author |
Topic |
 Weight What Gallente |
Posted - 2010.03.17 20:05:00 - [ 1021]
I have to say that it's more secure letting captain fovious guard the goodies at an easter-egg hunt than this group of scammers. Reading that EVE Tribune article it is clear that Ray McCormack doesn't even have the competence to justify his arrogant groin waving.
Be careful, because one day someone might douse that groin in the lighter fluid of righteous indignation and set it afire to serve as an example for the rest of his ilk |
 Ray McCormack Nordar Innovations. |
Posted - 2010.03.17 20:09:00 - [ 1022]
Originally by: Weight What competence
Competence doesn't bear comparison when the previous management managed to lose 1.2t ISK to who knows where. Don't confuse me being a ****er with incompetence. |
 Dzil Caldari Caldari Independent Navy Reserve The Fourth District |
Posted - 2010.03.17 20:11:00 - [ 1023]
Seriously? We can't say wnaker without censorship?
What is this, the UK?
|
 Weight What Gallente |
Posted - 2010.03.17 20:11:00 - [ 1024]
Originally by: Ray McCormack
Originally by: Weight What competence
Competence doesn't bear comparison when the previous management managed to lose 1.2t ISK to who knows where. Don't confuse me being a ****er with incompetence.
But, so far, what of any concrete basis has come forth from EBANK to assuage the angry public? Wither the Golden Shield to repel the torch-bearers? |
 Ray McCormack Nordar Innovations. |
Posted - 2010.03.17 20:16:00 - [ 1025]
Originally by: Weight What assuage the angry public?
It's not my job to satisfy the public's interest further, there are public financials - that is all they will ever get, and it's enough. |
 RAW23 |
Posted - 2010.03.17 20:53:00 - [ 1026]
|
 Companion Trollin You are going too fast |
Posted - 2010.03.17 21:03:00 - [ 1027]
Don't you fools realize that the more hate you throw at ebank the stronger it becomes? You need to kill it with love, LOVE! |
 Dasola Minmatar |
Posted - 2010.03.17 21:55:00 - [ 1028]
I would like ebank to do vote of trust on ray by depositors. If ray fails to gain more then 50% vote of confidence, kick hes ass out. He clearly does more harm then good on ebank if plan really is to return bank in solvency. Currently ray manages to undermine any trust left on ebanks survival and if ray continues to leader of BoD is rellay dont believe ebank will ever recover.
Ho the hell chose him anyways? bank is owned by its depositors so when did we get asked ho we would like from these candidates to be new leader? So far ray has managed to angry major depositors, throw away any TOS ebank had (not honoring original and drawing up new one, none expects to last anyways). and failed to deliver even things he promised himself to deliver.
He even references that plan has not changed. Well how can it change when there is no plan. Simple as that. Wheres the promised openes? things are as secret as ever, if not even more so since now they collet your api information and store it for "future" use. |
 Aixa Syal Minmatar Blood Inquisition |
Posted - 2010.03.17 22:07:00 - [ 1029]
Ray you been through so much and still here, I am cheering you on!!!
|
 Kitimortoa |
Posted - 2010.03.17 22:08:00 - [ 1030]
Originally by: Companion Trollin Don't you fools realize that the more hate you throw at ebank the stronger it becomes? You need to kill it with love, LOVE!
Or everyone cut their losses and make sure all characters associated with the "faces" of ebank are wardec'd where ever they go for all eternity... Cut your losses you fools and kill some people for revenge, don't hold on to a giant ponzi scheme in some assinine hope that you *might* one day recover whatever money you put into it. For god's sake, stop dumping more money in to this obvious scam...if you want to throw your money away ****ing send it to me, I'll at least spend it to make sure people get wardec'd repeatedly  And about the api thing Dasola, you realize you can change your api key from this very website :P |
 RJ Nobel Nobel Research and Development |
Posted - 2010.03.17 22:11:00 - [ 1031]
Edited by: RJ Nobel on 17/03/2010 23:32:38 Originally by: Ray McCormack
It's not my job to satisfy the public's interest further, there are public financials - that is all they will ever get, and it's enough.
I'll agree that the public financials are the best means of communication with the public. I have no interest in trolling or asking pointless questions. I simply want to see Ebank move forward. To that end: On February 26, 2009, Ebank had assets of 702b and liabilities of 1,914b (public financial's "history" tab). On March 17th, 2010, Ebank has assets of 711b and liabilities of 1914b. How does that qualify as "enough"? Edited: changed millions to billions, thanks Dzil.  |
 Professor Leech Transmetropolitan
|
Posted - 2010.03.17 22:12:00 - [ 1032]
Actually any spare isk would be best invested in my corporation. No matter the amount I can pay more interest than ebank, because I can pay interest. |
 Companion Qube Minmatar Electron Conservation Inc SRS. |
Posted - 2010.03.17 22:18:00 - [ 1033]
Ebank I believe in you, ignore all the haters. They see you rollin, they hatin, patrollin, an tryin to catch you ridin dirty.
Don't let all these fora whora catch you ridin' dirty. |
 Atima Minmatar House of Marbles |
Posted - 2010.03.17 22:21:00 - [ 1034]
I don't see why everyone is trolling Ray and EBANK so hard. I have alot of respect for ray to step up into this difficult position. TBH I think Ray is the best man for the job to return EBANK to its former glory by encouraging depositors and returning it to solvency.
Really I think people forget how great an accomplishment EBANK was. Keep going Ray, the community believes in you. |
 Professor Leech Transmetropolitan
|
Posted - 2010.03.17 22:25:00 - [ 1035]
Originally by: Atima
Really I think people forget how great an accomplishment EBANK was. Keep going Ray, the community believes in you.
Ebanks main accomplishment is losing 1.3T isk and not noticing it. I agree that this is a great feat. |
 Lui Kai Better Than You
|
Posted - 2010.03.17 22:28:00 - [ 1036]
There is really only one question that needs to be addressed, to soothe the customers and restore calm:
Did you guys send Ric a "One Year Scammerversary" card this month? |
 Kitimortoa |
Posted - 2010.03.17 22:30:00 - [ 1037]
|
 Companion Qube Minmatar Electron Conservation Inc SRS. |
Posted - 2010.03.17 22:33:00 - [ 1038]
Originally by: Professor Leech
Originally by: Atima
Really I think people forget how great an accomplishment EBANK was. Keep going Ray, the community believes in you.
Ebanks main accomplishment is losing 1.3T isk and not noticing it. I agree that this is a great feat.
Doesn't that make ebank about 300b more incompetent than goonswarm? Just saying. |
 Kitimortoa |
Posted - 2010.03.17 22:38:00 - [ 1039]
|
 Professor Leech Transmetropolitan
|
Posted - 2010.03.17 22:41:00 - [ 1040]
Originally by: Companion Qube
Doesn't that make ebank about 300b more incompetent than goonswarm? Just saying.
Being worse than the worst alliance in the game? That is another great feat. There's no doubt that ebank is exceptional. |
 Dzil Caldari Caldari Independent Navy Reserve The Fourth District |
Posted - 2010.03.17 23:26:00 - [ 1041]
Originally by: RJ Nobel
Originally by: Ray McCormack
It's not my job to satisfy the public's interest further, there are public financials - that is all they will ever get, and it's enough.
I'll agree that the public financials are the best means of communication with the public. I have no interest in trolling or asking pointless questions. I simply want to see Ebank move forward. To that end:
On February 26, 2009, Ebank had assets of 702m and liabilities of 1,914m (public financial's "history" tab).
On March 17th, 2010, Ebank has assets of 711m and liabilities of 1914m.
How does that qualify as "enough"?
Well that's a hell of a lot better than they were doing 6 months ago. The debt is down to 2 billion? I think a recovery by the end of the year is definitely possible. |
 Marcus Baltar Savaran Zhayedan Spah |
Posted - 2010.03.18 00:09:00 - [ 1042]
Originally by: RJ Nobel I'll agree that the public financials are the best means of communication with the public. I have no interest in trolling or asking pointless questions. I simply want to see Ebank move forward. To that end:
On February 26, 2009, Ebank had assets of 702m and liabilities of 1,914m (public financial's "history" tab).
On March 17th, 2010, Ebank has assets of 711m and liabilities of 1914m.
How does that qualify as "enough"?
Think that date was supposed to be 2010.02.26, not 2009.02.26. Originally by: Dzil Well that's a hell of a lot better than they were doing 6 months ago. The debt is down to 2 billion? I think a recovery by the end of the year is definitely possible.
I have (from the public financials); Date Total Deposits Total Withdrawals Assets Liabilities 2009.09.09 9,973,593,399,413 6,711,329,076,985 809,179,766,901 1,803,740,550,273 2010.03.16 10,069,398,354,889 7,224,898,692,270 711,380,669,798 1,914,824,139,166 |
 Professor Leech Transmetropolitan
|
Posted - 2010.03.18 00:25:00 - [ 1043]
Thanks Marcus, my faith in ebank is restored. Primarily because of the decrease in A - L. |
 Companion Trollin You are going too fast |
Posted - 2010.03.18 05:25:00 - [ 1044]
Ebank I believe in you, you can do it, just give it your all!! |
 CCP Applebabe

 |
Posted - 2010.03.18 09:51:00 - [ 1045]
Locked as user requested. |