open All Channels
seplocked EVE General Discussion
blankseplocked Dominion: Fighting ON stations
This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.

Pages: 1 2 [3]

Author Topic

Kyusoath Orillian
Haters Gonna Hate
Posted - 2009.11.13 15:15:00 - [61]

Originally by: Mars Amar
thought the whole idea of the new sov mechanic was to allow more small corps / alliance a chance to hold the remote rep and docking will play a part in them keeping sov for longer other wise we are gonna have the same as we have now ....big alliance more ships biiger gank squad....small group no chance what so ever and vise versa.

My choice leve 0.0 as it is ...BUT....change it for highsec and all those war deccing ***s that hide on station and dock get nerfed.


Titan Pilot
Imperial Academy
Posted - 2009.11.13 15:34:00 - [62]

Edited by: Titan Pilot on 13/11/2009 15:41:58
Originally by: Waagaa Ktlehr
Originally by: Titan Pilot
IT alliance agreeing with this is laughable at best. Gee I wonder why they agree... And the moment they recapture their home systems, they will petition this and say its unfair. Blah blah blah

Ahahahahaha, lovely the bitter tears.
Scared much?

When you get serious and take systems instead of posting silly announcements... maybe

But lets be honest, if you were defending BOB instead of attacking as IT, do you really think you would be in this thread?

yeah thats what I thought... use your noodle m8, what your asking here is the kitchen sink regarding agro mechanics. And if you get it great, just less logistics pilots to use on both sides

Posted - 2009.11.14 20:47:00 - [63]

can you leave the propaganda out of it and either explain why leaving it be adds to the game and why changing it would add to the game?

I personally think that defending should be harder than attacking. Eve should be about attack and counter attack.

This mechanic makes it easier to defend by a wide margin.

Posted - 2009.11.30 22:36:00 - [64]

This STILL has no response and is still a problem. Where here already now, how long are they going to let this ruin gameplay?

Mara Rinn
Posted - 2009.11.30 22:54:00 - [65]

There is a thread about this, admittedly it's in the assembly hall instead of Features and Ideas where it belongs.

The proposal is basically this: if you agress someone, your agression timer starts up and is refreshed as long as people are shooting at you. So no longer can you simply stop shooting and then be able to dock one minute later.

Jaeden Aquilae
Posted - 2009.12.01 00:06:00 - [66]

I've never understood the logic to this part of Eve, honestly. Who in their right mind would operate a space station that allowed ships shooting at people while they are docking. The repair bills would be astronormous.

Concord puts guns on gates, corps should put guns on their stations. You want to fight your wars and flip your cans? Fine, but not here. Any combat within 200km of the station and we start firing on you. Don't even think of docking here or at any of our corp's other stations until you pay a heavy fine first.

Not saying this should be done, but I'm saying it's all pretty silly when you think about it.

At this point, Jita 4-4 should be a smoking hulk of wreckage with nothing to dock TO.

Fly By Night Enterprises
Posted - 2009.12.01 01:10:00 - [67]

Originally by: steveid
Anyone who's pvped much in eve will have heard the words in vent "i'm not playing undock games on a station". Its a known variable. A pain in the ass. Something that makes killing your target irritating and difficult for a myriad of reasons not least their ability to dock and remote repping ability without an agression timer.

You really should just say, "for myriad reasons". Really, if you can't replace "myriad" with "ten thousand", just don't use it.

So, as you can see, the "a" and "of" in "a myriad of" are completely extraneous... As is this entire post.

Pages: 1 2 [3]

This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


The new forums are live

Please adjust your bookmarks to

These forums are archived and read-only