open All Channels
seplocked Jita Park Speakers Corner
blankseplocked Sokratesz for CSM 2009!
 
This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 
Pages: 1 [2] 3

Author Topic

Sokratesz
Rionnag Alba
Northern Coalition.
Posted - 2009.11.09 17:41:00 - [31]
 

Originally by: Raa Jin
Do you have any thoughts on the situation with drones and having to tell them to do stuff 4-5 times before they will actually do as they are told and then a second or 2 later going back to whatever the hell they feel like doing?



I think CCP has tried to 'fix' drone behaviour about ever patch for the last 2 years or so Laughing. I have to admit that I have not be bothered by any significant problems with their behaviour for awhile now even though I use drones a lot. Are there any specific situations that it seems to happen in?


Originally by: Raa Jin

Iím also kind of curios to hear your thoughts on the expansion name as it seems to be geared towards an effort to break the dominion of the large alliancesíTwisted EvilYARRRR!!



Heh. Fortunately -a- has no pretences to dominate the eve-lives of anyone other than those who enter our space uninvited..and occasional bystanders Wink


Raa Jin
Posted - 2009.11.10 09:05:00 - [32]
 

noticed it happen a few times during pvp (although this could be atributed to lag) where you tell your drones to return to bay and they flat out ignore you. i have also seen it in missons with multiple agro you tell it a ship to shoot and the drone icon dose flick over to the desired target with all 5 drones if you hover the mouse over it then about a second later it will switch back and shoot whatever random it feels like (usualy the triger heh)

Sokratesz
Rionnag Alba
Northern Coalition.
Posted - 2009.11.10 10:03:00 - [33]
 

Ah yes the returning...that's the only problem I have discovered occasionally but it could be atributed to lag alone.

Sokratesz
Rionnag Alba
Northern Coalition.
Posted - 2009.11.10 18:11:00 - [34]
 

Would like to add that I will be supporting any motions that deal with 'fixing' command ships and maybe prepare one of my own together with a few more experiences cs pilots. (again: ideas welcome!)

Manfred Sideous
Body Count Inc.
Pandemic Legion
Posted - 2009.11.12 03:20:00 - [35]
 

+1 vote as long as you will yell at ccp for the dominion fiasco that we are dealing with.

michael weels
Gallente
Posted - 2009.11.12 08:58:00 - [36]
 

Why do you feel that L4 missions should remain a high-sec commodity, when we all know that Exodus which was supposed to make all players move to 0.0 introduced them and caused the reverse effect.. I.e more people than ever stayed in high-sec..

And now, even with Dominion and a chance for CCP to change their stance by decreasing LP or isk rewards with each high sec-mission, they still won't do it.

So in short .. do you really feel pve'rs should really have a natural benefit in high-sec?

Why?
With the new system in place, wouldn't they actually do more good in 0.0?

Other then that much ♥ for any -A-, and most notable ex/current TRI member's running for CSM (Which R A is=P) =)

BOEHKOP
Posted - 2009.11.12 09:20:00 - [37]
 

Edited by: BOEHKOP on 12/11/2009 09:20:55
Dear Sokratesz.

Can you publish small "press release" related to rumors that you was involved in scam?

http://www.eveonline.com/iNgameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1028199&page=1#1

Scam is part of game, as well CSM. We just like to know little more about candidates.

Remember that Consul that was banned after attempt to rise some "free isk" using insider information?
Will you be able to resist?

Sokratesz
Rionnag Alba
Northern Coalition.
Posted - 2009.11.12 10:25:00 - [38]
 

Edited by: Sokratesz on 12/11/2009 10:35:36

Originally by: michael weels
Why do you feel that L4 missions should remain a high-sec commodity, when we all know that Exodus which was supposed to make all players move to 0.0 introduced them and caused the reverse effect.. I.e more people than ever stayed in high-sec..


I have noticed that some of the other candidates have voiced quite strong opinions about the level 4 question in the CSM matchmaker. My current stand remains 'mildly against moving level 4 mission to lowsec' because I don't think it would solve much. The people who use missions to make ISK to finance their pvp losses may already do so in the more lucrative places (0.0, empire) because the isk/hr difference is quite large, and the majority who runs the missions for enjoyment (to finance more expensive pve tools) or business (sell isk) will simply not go into lowsec and find other means of making good isk in highsec.

In short, I don't believe it would change much in present-day eve. I would be in favour of making 0.0 and lowsec more attractive to these players but that would have to be done in a more subtle way or go accompanied with suitable changes. (f. ex. to prevent them all getting ganked on the ingate to lowsec or 0.0)

Perhaps with Dominion this will change - I will have to review my stance on this one and indeed on many items once the effects of Dominion have been fully felt.

And thanks, my heart still lies with tri <3 ask all your ex-nano*** buddies to vote for me :D


Originally by: BOEHKOP
Dear Sokratesz.

Can you publish small "press release" related to rumors that you was involved in scam?

http://www.eveonline.com/iNgameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1028199&page=1#1

Scam is part of game, as well CSM. We just like to know little more about candidates.

Remember that Consul that was banned after attempt to rise some "free isk" using insider information?
Will you be able to resist?


First, let me draw a very fat line between in-game activities that are allowed and in fact endorsed by CCP like piracy and scamming, and the combination of metagaming and illegal in-game acitivies that Larkonis was doing.

Second, yes, I made some isk there in a way that not everyone might approve of. But those players, both apparantly unfamiliar with game mechanics, were there every step of the way and they fell for it with eyes wide open. I merely equalised their balance between isk and sense, and there are countless people, friends, corp and alliancemates that can testify that I am not an 'inherently evil' person or have a tendency to betray my fellows. I have been with my current corp for over two years now, and I am proud to say that I see no reason why I would ever have to leave it. You can find more information in a thread made by one of the victims here. This thread incidentally will also provide proof of his cluelessness. Let me also stress that this was the first and in my book last time that I engaged in such activities, but I believe it is part of the game and will oppose any suggestions that would make scamming illegal or impossible (see: CSM matchmaker)

Thus, I have no intention to follow in Larkonis' footsteps and the suggestion itself sounds appalling.

AdmiralFreeman
Rionnag Alba
Triumvirate.
Posted - 2009.11.12 19:01:00 - [39]
 

+1 Bump for a friend

Hsi Mu
Sex Money Guns
Posted - 2009.11.12 20:55:00 - [40]
 

Go Sok! Go!

Vidi Angelus
Caldari
Perkone
Posted - 2009.11.12 23:22:00 - [41]
 

You have my vote.

Alex Under
H A V O C
Against ALL Authorities
Posted - 2009.11.13 03:36:00 - [42]
 

You got my vote. Someone needs to represent the PvPers this round.

Lunewrath
Amarr
Posted - 2009.11.13 05:07:00 - [43]
 

Voting Sok as Supercap balancing is gonna be a very hot topic with the expansion. Not a dumbass, knows his **** :) 2nd vote going here.

Sokratesz
Rionnag Alba
Northern Coalition.
Posted - 2009.11.13 09:33:00 - [44]
 

Bumping this because of acutet-rex in an f16

Sokratesz
Rionnag Alba
Northern Coalition.
Posted - 2009.11.13 10:00:00 - [45]
 

I would also like to stress what has een briefly mentioned in the inteview with the eve tribune: I privately own both a ms and a titan so I am following the changes around them closely - but I have sofar withheld any thorough comments because I feel that CCP nees to make up their bloody mind first.

Expect comment at length once its final and on TQ.

Sokratesz
Rionnag Alba
Northern Coalition.
Posted - 2009.11.14 10:14:00 - [46]
 

Saturday Morning Hangover Bump

Weltact
INVICTUS.
Posted - 2009.11.14 18:36:00 - [47]
 

+1 for more votes Very Happy

Irongut
Sex Money Guns
Posted - 2009.11.14 21:21:00 - [48]
 

Vote Sok... Once you've gone bald you'll never go back!

HybridMiner
Rudis Vox
Posted - 2009.11.15 02:55:00 - [49]
 

Gogogo, don't forget to vote Sok!

Ancy Denaries
Posted - 2009.11.15 12:39:00 - [50]
 

Voted for you ;)

Sokratesz
Rionnag Alba
Northern Coalition.
Posted - 2009.11.16 05:57:00 - [51]
 

Edited by: Sokratesz on 16/11/2009 09:59:36
goooooooooooooooooooooooood morning eve

it's 0-600, what's the o stand for

ooooh my gawd its early!


A (very) short comment on the recent developments regarding Dominion:

In my opinion, motherships should NOT be allowed to dock by default and even allowing them to do so with a station upgrade would be pushing it.

The announced reduction in build requirements is agreeable as long as existing owners are compensated for it.

Sokratesz
Rionnag Alba
Northern Coalition.
Posted - 2009.11.17 09:51:00 - [52]
 

tuesday bump

Sokratesz
Rionnag Alba
Northern Coalition.
Posted - 2009.11.18 07:42:00 - [53]
 

bump, seems jpsc has gone quiet past few days

michael weels
Gallente
Posted - 2009.11.18 20:24:00 - [54]
 


Sokratesz
Rionnag Alba
Northern Coalition.
Posted - 2009.11.18 20:54:00 - [55]
 

just left my titan afk in a belt in lowsec for like 20 mins by accident does that score me any points?

Stevakis
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Posted - 2009.11.19 01:47:00 - [56]
 

After you got all the votes from AAA, you switch over to Triumvirate which does not have a candidate. I'm sure you have a very good reason for this suspicious behaviour?

Sokratesz
Rionnag Alba
Northern Coalition.
Posted - 2009.11.19 07:20:00 - [57]
 

Edited by: Sokratesz on 19/11/2009 07:24:40

Originally by: Stevakis
After you got all the votes from AAA, you switch over to Triumvirate which does not have a candidate. I'm sure you have a very good reason for this suspicious behaviour?


How is it suspicious? Corp decides to switch alliances, if you see some sort of malicious intent, well, both AAA and TRI know that wasn't the case but more power to you. It's not like it will change anything about my view on the game or my list of priorities..

thanks for the bump ;p

Sokratesz
Rionnag Alba
Northern Coalition.
Posted - 2009.11.20 07:56:00 - [58]
 

Bump :)

Sokratesz
Rionnag Alba
Northern Coalition.
Posted - 2009.11.21 08:59:00 - [59]
 

is it saturday already?

Sokratesz
Rionnag Alba
Northern Coalition.
Posted - 2009.11.22 11:08:00 - [60]
 

I would like to inform all of you that Absolut Vodka is awesome


Pages: 1 [2] 3

This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 


The new forums are live

Please adjust your bookmarks to https://forums.eveonline.com

These forums are archived and read-only