Author |
Topic |
 AnatomicalFaith Gallente Instant Annihilation
|
Posted - 2009.05.21 17:35:00 - [ 31]
Support 100% |
 Keitoshi Yamada Caldari Sephray Industries Serenitas Solutus
|
Posted - 2009.05.21 18:56:00 - [ 32]
Supported.
Station games need to not even exist.
Telling someone not to play station games is telling someone that "there is a problem here, but I have no solution for it other than a lame troll"
Honestly, if you rep someone, you are now part of the fight. If you disagree, then go play some other game. IRL, if there are two people fighting, and another person jumps into the fray with some bandaids and painkillers, you'd bet that the other person would decide that you have joined the fight, too. Why would the person who you're helping want to spend any time to kill you?
Seriously, positive effects should aggress the opponent, and offensive effects should aggress the defensive.
Hell, if it were my decision, any and all effects would aggress everyone involved. |
 Cookz Semarian
|
Posted - 2009.05.21 19:10:00 - [ 33]
supported |
 Car Wars Mortis Angelus Northern Coalition.
|
Posted - 2009.05.21 23:36:00 - [ 34]
Remote repping should be risky. supported. |
 Gavin Darklighter Ministry of War
|
Posted - 2009.05.22 01:22:00 - [ 35]
I would take it a step further and give the people who are attacking the person getting RR'd killrights on the RR'er |
 Tekno Viking |
Posted - 2009.05.22 01:50:00 - [ 36]
not supported |
 Kailen Thorn Caldari Serenity Prime Cascade Probable |
Posted - 2009.05.22 09:52:00 - [ 37]
/ supported |
 Dktr Faustus
|
Posted - 2009.05.22 10:15:00 - [ 38]
Originally by: V0rtigern If you interfere with a PVP action you deserve the same consequence this is EvE after all, actions must have a consequence!
Wot he said |
 Fille Balle Ballbreakers R us
|
Posted - 2009.05.22 10:26:00 - [ 39]
Edited by: Fille Balle on 22/05/2009 10:26:38 Originally by: Dktr Faustus
Originally by: V0rtigern If you interfere with a PVP action you deserve the same consequence this is EvE after all, actions must have a consequence!
Wot he said
Ok, but how about adding consequences to wardec's? Have you thought about that? At the moment, you can declare war and if it turns out that that you're in over your head, there's no consequences. So, how do you suggest balancing this feature? Regarding gates: learn 2 tackle? Learn 2 gate camp? It's not that hard. In fact, l2p |
 Shan Dollean The Illuminatii Dirt Nap Squad.
|
Posted - 2009.05.22 12:59:00 - [ 40]
Originally by: V0rtigern If you interfere with a PVP action you deserve the same consequence this is EvE after all, actions must have a consequence!
This. Supported. |
 The Jackhammer Minmatar MunsterMunch Hydroponic Zone
|
Posted - 2009.05.22 15:32:00 - [ 41]
Originally by: Fille Balle Ok, but how about adding consequences to wardec's? Have you thought about that? At the moment, you can declare war and if it turns out that that you're in over your head, there's no consequences. So, how do you suggest balancing this feature?
Learn how to read the OP  Supported |
 Aastarius
|
Posted - 2009.05.22 16:05:00 - [ 42]
Fully supported |
 RoCkEt X Hostile. PURPLE HELMETED WARRIORS |
Posted - 2009.05.22 16:09:00 - [ 43]
not supported, it adds another dimension to pvp, you should be able to take into account anything that might happen during the fight. just have your own backup and ensure you have something to deal with the logistics ship.
not supported
-RX |
 Caassimolar |
Posted - 2009.05.22 23:50:00 - [ 44]
Originally by: RoCkEt X not supported, it adds another dimension to pvp, you should be able to take into account anything that might happen during the fight. just have your own backup and ensure you have something to deal with the logistics ship.
not supported
-RX
Read the op in its entirety, the only solution is to blob heavily, is that really a solution you're advocating? if not, give us examples. |
 Keitoshi Yamada Caldari Sephray Industries Serenitas Solutus |
Posted - 2009.05.23 02:14:00 - [ 45]
Originally by: RoCkEt X not supported, it adds another dimension to pvp, you should be able to take into account anything that might happen during the fight. just have your own backup and ensure you have something to deal with the logistics ship.
not supported
-RX
That's gotta be one of the most ridiculous arguments I've ever heard. Either you didn't read the OP correctly, or you're stupid. Woo, dealing with a logistics ship, fine, no one has a problem with logistics ships. OP has a problem with people repping other people with no consequence. Say I wardec you. You attack our fleet, and an alt corp's fleet with nothing but logistics ships come in. They can actively repair my fleet with no consequences, and you can do nothing about it unless you want to wardec the alt corp, which isn't a solution to a mistake in the game's current mechanics. |
 The PitBoss Interstellar Brotherhood of Gravediggers The 0rphanage |
Posted - 2009.05.23 04:09:00 - [ 46]
Edited by: The PitBoss on 23/05/2009 04:13:54 Originally by: Caassimolar Read the op in its entirety, the only solution is to blob heavily, is that really a solution you're advocating? if not, give us examples.
ok .. let me break it down. - I war dec a corporation .... one of its pilots decides to flaunt a ship I can easily kill infront of me.
- I start shooting the ship ... all of a sudden his ALT (who is hugging a station -or- a warp gate) starts remote repping him
- His alt is now aggressed to me ... leaving me the option to shoot the original target -or- shoot the remote repper.
- So if I shoot the remote repper ... he is allowed to dock up or jump through the gate anytime he feels comfortable ... He doesn't have to wait the NORMAL 1 minute de-aggro to do so. In which I could probably kill him during that de-aggro time and punish him for sticking his nose in our war.
- If I ignore the repper ... i'm fighting a losing battle against a ship i can normally take.
So what I'm asking for .. is the NORMAL de-aggro 1 minute timer on the remote repper just like everyone else gets. |
 Scatim Helicon GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
|
Posted - 2009.05.23 10:09:00 - [ 47]
There's something hilarious about Privateer Alliance of all people complaining about the use of NPC corp alts.
However its a valid issue, so thumbs up. |
 S'vart Tseirgn Calimae Logistics Foundation Manifest Destiny.
|
Posted - 2009.05.23 12:04:00 - [ 48]
Supported - it definitely needs fixing. |
 Kiri Serrensun
|
Posted - 2009.05.23 22:21:00 - [ 49]
Edited by: Kiri Serrensun on 23/05/2009 22:21:31 Supported. |
 killerco Gallente Incompertus INC Fatal Ascension
|
Posted - 2009.05.24 11:12:00 - [ 50]
supported |
 Verys I Heart Chaos
|
Posted - 2009.05.24 19:27:00 - [ 51]
You get involved in a fight you get aggro simple as. It makes no sense that it's not like this already since logistics can really turn the tide in a battle. |
 scartor
|
Posted - 2009.05.24 19:45:00 - [ 52]
confirming that i agree with the op.
there should be a penalty to turn the tide in a engagement that you have no right to interfere with |
 Builder AlphaOne |
Posted - 2009.05.25 15:17:00 - [ 53]
full support. and i've seen guys from the author's alliance [Privateers] doing exactly this outside stations, after which they dock immediately.
[ingame since beta testing.] |
 The Jackhammer Minmatar MunsterMunch Hydroponic Zone |
Posted - 2009.05.25 16:02:00 - [ 54]
Originally by: Builder AlphaOne [ingame since beta testing.]
But still can't figure out how to click the 'support' button ...  |
 Tunamake
|
Posted - 2009.05.26 15:44:00 - [ 55]
Full aggression penalties should be applied. |
 Kelban Kevar Gallente Evocations of Shadow Eternal Evocations |
Posted - 2009.05.27 23:04:00 - [ 56]
let um get cocorded for now on nuff said |
 Ignition SemperFi No Falcons Allowed
|
Posted - 2009.05.28 15:39:00 - [ 57]
Originally by: Kelban Kevar let um get cocorded for now on nuff said
NO! but still supporting the OP's topic |
 Spartacist Helecho
|
Posted - 2009.05.28 16:57:00 - [ 58]
Supported  |
 FU22 The 8th Order
|
Posted - 2009.05.29 00:45:00 - [ 59]
supported |
 Delvardious Kaesos Caldari State Protectorate
|
Posted - 2009.05.29 01:56:00 - [ 60]
Supported. |