Originally by: Xaen
Contrary to popular belief, being around a long time does not cause your points to be more valid. In fact, the game was so different back then as to be largely irrelevant.
Yes because back then we could dual mwd ravens and bomb the hell out of people and not get caught. Same premise. Same problem. Put 2 mwd's on a frig, and wow, the ship would stay on the grid for maybe 3 seconds.
Originally by: Xaen
Interceptors are the ones that go omgfast, but then getting outrun by a curse, thats a bit silly.
WTB Curse setup that goes 8km/s.
How bout one that does 18kms?
Originally by: Xaen
WTB BS setup that can go "stupid fast"
Ok, now your just being stupid.
Originally by: Xaen
And if you nerf the ability to nano a HAC what purpose will they serve then? Most battlecruisers would be more useful, cost a third as much and be fully insurable.
They would fill their role that was intended, which I dont think CCP intended either.
Originally by: Xaen
Except interceptors are 3,000 - 4,000 m/s faster. And only until somebody decides to shoot your drones. Or do you think you can rescoop them while you're going 3500m/s and your drones go 800 m/s?
Now your making me laugh if you think that works everytime. You must fight alot of stupid pilots.
Originally by: Aerick Dawn
If I get caught in a camp, its stupid easy to get back to the gate or just to extend and escape.
Originally by: Xaen
Good, gatecamping is kinda lame.
Bitter much?
Originally by: Xaen
Even a web is not supposed to be an "I WIN BUTAN". Have you ever thought of clicking approach and lighting up your MWD to stay in range?
I dont think you actually fight, perhaps on the forums, because with server lag, targeting lag, and everything else, this is not possible unless the nanopilot makes a huge error, or has really bad lag. You can reapproach gates on each side endlessly until you extend and escape, which I have done in a nanohac a bajillion times.
Originally by: Xaen
Clearly. Post a change that wouldn't completely unbalance things and render HACs useless and people might take you seriously.
Clearly, you have no idea what you are talking about, so perhaps stop making an idiot out of yourself. I fly nano'd up hacs alot, because I know its way easier to extend and escape, and fight when I feel like it. It makes it so much easier to not get killed when soloing, it's unbalancing in a ship with that kind of firepower. When inties came out, I flew them exclusively because of that very reason, but now that we have nano'd up hacs that can do far more damage and can take down far larger targets, for the same risk, the choice is simple and destroys the roles that each ship class should be playing.
All Channels
EVE General Discussion
Please visit your user settings to re-enable images.
