open All Channels
seplocked Assembly Hall
blankseplocked [Issue] Minmatar capitals are terrible
 
This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 
Pages: first : previous : ... 8 9 10 11 [12] 13 14 15 16 ... : last (20)

Author Topic

Elena Morin'staal
Minmatar
Conflagration.
Wildly Inappropriate.
Posted - 2008.09.19 14:12:00 - [331]
 

I support this. I like matari ships, but they need to be brought up to balance with the others.

Bane Glorious
Ministry of War
Posted - 2008.09.19 18:24:00 - [332]
 

Originally by: Triest
Originally by: Cpt Lumis
Is there a CSM or someone that can let us know If anything is going on about this. At least a update. There are many post about this date and that date we will know. Everyday I come on and look and nothing. I have a minny dread and it is all battle ready but the torps. I would like to know if I need to train them or not. Thank you for your help.


I wouldn't hold your breath; like most of the other PVP-focused balance issues (e.g. Black Ops battleships) there's very little incentive on the part of CCP to do anything about the Naglfar/Nidhoggur. The number of players who can fly the ships and who consider them unbalanced is small, and moreover have enough time/skillpoints sunk to not quit out of hand about it.

I'm not at liberty to say any kind of update one way or another.

Hottie McGee
GoonFleet
GoonSwarm
Posted - 2008.09.22 02:25:00 - [333]
 

i know i supported this, but everytime i talk to my fellow goons about capitals, and tell them i'm planning on training minmatar, they just brow beat me about not training for a rev. it's not a hard change, and there is a reason not many people fly this ship.

TimGascoigne
Sebiestor Tribe
Posted - 2008.09.22 10:15:00 - [334]
 

Originally by: Bane Glorious

I'm not at liberty to say any kind of update one way or another.


I think the question was is this issue part of the CSM agenda? not what are the proposed CCP changes.

IloveRickAstley
Posted - 2008.09.22 11:22:00 - [335]
 

never gunna give you up

Bane Glorious
Ministry of War
Posted - 2008.09.22 13:51:00 - [336]
 

Originally by: TimGascoigne
Originally by: Bane Glorious

I'm not at liberty to say any kind of update one way or another.


I think the question was is this issue part of the CSM agenda? not what are the proposed CCP changes.


If you look back a few pages, you'll see that this issue was approved by the CSM many weeks ago.

Triest
Sniggerdly
Pandemic Legion
Posted - 2008.09.22 15:24:00 - [337]
 

Originally by: Bane Glorious

If you look back a few pages, you'll see that this issue was approved by the CSM many weeks ago.


Right. The real question is whether CCP are actually doing anything about this, or any other CSM-debated topic. I don't doubt that some form of discussion was had by you guys, and maybe suggestions passed on to CCP, but it's the last step which has all the uncertainty. You say you can't update us on that (which I don't really understand, but it's presumably not your call), so I guess we're going to keep sporadically bumping this thread until CCP decide to tell us the score.

SickSeven
Simplistic Syndicate
Posted - 2008.09.24 02:44:00 - [338]
 

Originally by: Triest
Originally by: Bane Glorious

If you look back a few pages, you'll see that this issue was approved by the CSM many weeks ago.


Right. The real question is whether CCP are actually doing anything about this, or any other CSM-debated topic. I don't doubt that some form of discussion was had by you guys, and maybe suggestions passed on to CCP, but it's the last step which has all the uncertainty. You say you can't update us on that (which I don't really understand, but it's presumably not your call), so I guess we're going to keep sporadically bumping this thread until CCP decide to tell us the score.


Saying "It is approved to be an issue" is like saying,'we give you permission to complain'. Well that doesn't really help us in and of itself unless someone is actually going to listen. I've got about 8 months before I make an involuntary trip to a certain sandy place and I'd like to be able to proudly fly a balanced Naglfar before then!!

Yorda
Battlestars
GoonSwarm
Posted - 2008.09.25 20:19:00 - [339]
 

Originally by: Triest
Originally by: Bane Glorious

If you look back a few pages, you'll see that this issue was approved by the CSM many weeks ago.


Right. The real question is whether CCP are actually doing anything about this, or any other CSM-debated topic. I don't doubt that some form of discussion was had by you guys, and maybe suggestions passed on to CCP, but it's the last step which has all the uncertainty. You say you can't update us on that (which I don't really understand, but it's presumably not your call), so I guess we're going to keep sporadically bumping this thread until CCP decide to tell us the score.


What part of "I'm not at liberty to say any kind of update one way or another." didn't you understand?


Originally by: Hottie McGee
i know i supported this, but everytime i talk to my fellow goons about capitals, and tell them i'm planning on training minmatar, they just brow beat me about not training for a rev. it's not a hard change, and there is a reason not many people fly this ship.


The Nidhoggur's pretty good, and it's actually quicker to train a rev than training a naglfar even with the nidhoggur fully speced.

Triest
Sniggerdly
Pandemic Legion
Posted - 2008.09.26 01:50:00 - [340]
 

Edited by: Triest on 26/09/2008 01:50:29
Originally by: Yorda
What part of "I'm not at liberty to say any kind of update one way or another." didn't you understand?



The part where it makes basically no sense, and seems like an excuse for CCP to do nothing based on anything the CSMs are doing.

"Surprise! We're going to make a huge change to ship speeds, now on test!"

vs

"CSMs are going to have tons of input into how we run our game, we'll fly them to Iceland, and have discussions! They also can't talk about anything that was discussed in specific detail, and we may or may not implement anything at some point in YEARS after the meeting."

Why make a big deal about this program, institute a forum, and so on, if they're going to sweep everything under the rug? I can READ Bein when he says 'I can't comment', but that doesn't mean I actually understand why that's the case.

Andreus Ixiris
Gallente
Mixed Metaphor

Posted - 2008.09.26 04:15:00 - [341]
 

Signed.

Vantlor
Gallente
Scrap Iron Flotilla
Electus Matari
Posted - 2008.10.01 10:51:00 - [342]
 

Great points! I completley agree (fly a nid myself and am just training for a Rev since it takes less time anyway...).

Katarina Arisdeed
Caldari
Macabre Votum
Morsus Mihi
Posted - 2008.10.01 12:44:00 - [343]
 

/signed I fly caldari capitals but I do agree that the matari ships especially the dread just don't seem to be what they should be considering how much extra training is needed to fit one properly, if it would be able to lets say fit 3 capital projectiles OR 3 citadel torp launchers then I think that it would make alot more sense

Drogo Dris
Red Federation

Posted - 2008.10.01 14:01:00 - [344]
 

Edited by: Drogo Dris on 01/10/2008 14:01:51
Signed.

The Naglfar needs both a damage boost AND tank boost for the extra amount of skill/training required to fly it. This needs fixing.

Bane Glorious
Ministry of War
Posted - 2008.10.02 00:42:00 - [345]
 

Originally by: Triest
Edited by: Triest on 26/09/2008 01:50:29
Originally by: Yorda
What part of "I'm not at liberty to say any kind of update one way or another." didn't you understand?



The part where it makes basically no sense, and seems like an excuse for CCP to do nothing based on anything the CSMs are doing.

"Surprise! We're going to make a huge change to ship speeds, now on test!"

vs

"CSMs are going to have tons of input into how we run our game, we'll fly them to Iceland, and have discussions! They also can't talk about anything that was discussed in specific detail, and we may or may not implement anything at some point in YEARS after the meeting."

Why make a big deal about this program, institute a forum, and so on, if they're going to sweep everything under the rug? I can READ Bein when he says 'I can't comment', but that doesn't mean I actually understand why that's the case.


Oh stop posting, jesus christ.

Triest
Sniggerdly
Pandemic Legion
Posted - 2008.10.02 13:10:00 - [346]
 

Edited by: Triest on 02/10/2008 13:20:27
Originally by: Bane Glorious

Oh stop posting, jesus christ.


I just think it's absolutely hilarious that we've gone from "complete transparency of the CSM's work to voters" as in the program text, to "I'm not at liberty to say any kind of update one way or another", all within the couple months since the program was started.

Really, though, it makes perfect sense. I'm sure CCP are just terrified of the sheer scope of market speculation into these tech 1 capital ships that could arise if they were to, you know, acknowledge that they're working on balancing a ship or something. We could be seeing, I don't know, 1.7, or maybe even 2 billion isk prices for these ships! And people actually buying them!

Eaiaden
Minmatar
The Institution.
Rooks and Kings
Posted - 2008.10.02 13:54:00 - [347]
 

Signed, beef up the minnie caps, its long overdue, training in general twice as long as other races with our mixed tanks and dual weapon system.

Ending up with the "joke of the game" ship isent promoting a balanced game with everyone training for revs and moros's.

And a little offtopic... Redo the Ragnarok grafic plz, looking at it makes baby jesus cry.

In general, you must have outsourced the task of creating minnie caps, they are in almost every way the biggest flaw in this game, it looks like its chinese child labours that did the job.

Col Callahan
Caldari
Boogie Monsters

Posted - 2008.10.04 12:15:00 - [348]
 

Signed/ you may be slaves, but that doesn't mean your pew pew power should be inferior as well.

Seth Ruin
Minmatar
Ominous Corp
Circle-Of-Two
Posted - 2008.10.04 23:04:00 - [349]
 

Agreed. Aside from the Nidhoggur, the rest of the Minmatar capitals are very sub-par.

Aluura Sky
Posted - 2008.10.06 15:16:00 - [350]
 

Just went on the SISI and what a disappointment is the NAGLFAR! Damage is so weak it makes my cry before going to sleep Crying or Very sad Boost this Minmatar Pride Super Vertical Machine Please Twisted Evil... and the rest of the min caps too

Yorda
Battlestars
GoonSwarm
Posted - 2008.10.12 14:44:00 - [351]
 

Edited by: Yorda on 12/10/2008 14:46:48
Major update: My new Nag comes out of the oven in like a week.

Taking bets on how many times I lose it before it gets buffed.

SickSeven
Simplistic Syndicate
Posted - 2008.10.13 00:39:00 - [352]
 

Originally by: Yorda
Edited by: Yorda on 12/10/2008 14:46:48
Major update: My new Nag comes out of the oven in like a week.

Taking bets on how many times I lose it before it gets buffed.


I say first major engagement.

Ess Erbe
Caldari
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
Posted - 2008.10.13 11:37:00 - [353]
 

Originally by: Yorda
Edited by: Yorda on 12/10/2008 14:46:48
Major update: My new Nag comes out of the oven in like a week.

Taking bets on how many times I lose it before it gets buffed.


Don't worry, CCP will fix it!

SUTARAofHELL
Caldari
g guild
Imperial Republic Of the North
Posted - 2008.10.13 16:17:00 - [354]
 

Edited by: SUTARAofHELL on 13/10/2008 16:17:27
Originally by: Yorda
Edited by: Yorda on 12/10/2008 14:46:48
Major update: My new Nag comes out of the oven in like a week.

Taking bets on how many times I lose it before it gets buffed.


Unfortunately you know you will be called primary, right? Shocked

P.S. Please CCP save Yorda!

Yorda
Battlestars
GoonSwarm
Posted - 2008.10.13 16:29:00 - [355]
 

I do seem to get primaried a lot, but any decent FC wont primary a nag in a cap fight. Lowest dps, high burst tank (it only lasts for 1-2minutes but that's about as long as most dreads last in a cap fight anyway), plus they're like a giant marker of where the enemy cap fleet is.

Pos shots on the other hand...

Asterisk Grat
STRATEGIC DEPLOYMENT
Posted - 2008.10.15 17:02:00 - [356]
 

Bane, is this something you'd want to discuss at the next CSM/CCP meeting?

http://myeve.eve-online.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=886168


Asterisk Grat
STRATEGIC DEPLOYMENT
Posted - 2008.10.15 17:06:00 - [357]
 

Edited by: Asterisk Grat on 15/10/2008 19:38:29
nvmd

Bane Glorious
Ministry of War
Posted - 2008.10.15 19:12:00 - [358]
 

Originally by: Asterisk Grat
Bane, is this something you'd want to discuss at the next CSM/CCP meeting?

http://myeve.eve-online.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=886168




We already discussed it, we passed it, and now CCP knows about it. SHEESH.

Asterisk Grat
STRATEGIC DEPLOYMENT
Posted - 2008.10.15 19:40:00 - [359]
 

good news then, hopefully they will do something.

I think i misread the other topic for being the actual meeting w/ ccp. Cool

islador
Gallente
Frontier Explorer's League

Posted - 2008.10.15 21:07:00 - [360]
 

supported, i love burning Mini caps :) *hugs moros* but a nice balllance there owuld be nice, and don't make it a nerf. get it right CCP, you can't afford another cluster****, you've already got 2 on your plate (GTCs Ghost training)


Pages: first : previous : ... 8 9 10 11 [12] 13 14 15 16 ... : last (20)

This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 


The new forums are live

Please adjust your bookmarks to https://forums.eveonline.com

These forums are archived and read-only