Posted - 2006.07.23 11:10:00 - [92]

 

Please dont insult people's sense of logic:

1) the accusation of using a login trap is refuted by ra saying the capital ships cynoed in;
2) no one is denying that 20 ra "stress" capital ships cynoed in;
3) those dreads would have been engaged, possibly with success,by era circa 30 plus bs support fleet, if
4) ra's support fleet of roughly equivalent size had not used a login trap to appear the same time as the dreads.

Please deny above if possible.

Posted - 2006.07.23 11:18:00 - [94]

 

2 capital fight, 2 for RA!

Nice job, go go RA

Fighting Lemmings must be amusing

Posted - 2006.07.23 11:19:00 - [96]

 

I am very sorry for my previous post and the people I offended
I mistakenly compare the Russians fight for freedom with RA fight to survive
All I wanted to say is that they fight until nothing left.
Sorry again for all.

PS: last night I was at the Dj tiesto event and I am still a little confused-drunk
http://www.tiesto.com/ is not an excuse is a fact :P

Posted - 2006.07.23 11:19:00 - [98]

 

Edited by: darth solo on 23/07/2006 11:21:55

shocking CT BadIronTree. totally shocking.

u should be banned from posting on these forums for that one as u dont deserve to be a member of this game. fool.

edit=looks like he apologised, fair enough. i hate seeing posts about RA coming down always to what happened in the war and such, no excuses for that. a games a game.

d solo.

Posted - 2006.07.23 11:23:00 - [100]

 

Edited by: kbullet on 23/07/2006 11:25:03
omg CT BadIronTree, that comment is just way over the line, ccp should perma ban him on the forums if not already

edit: you aint going to get away with a drunk excuse

Posted - 2006.07.23 11:27:00 - [102]

 

You guys KNOW RA do login traps [and most likely knew RA were in your vacinity, hard to miss a bunch of people moving up, even if 1 by 1], you also KNOW they don't have many number's. So having just 30 BS + support protecting 11 Dread's when you know all of this

Like Nebba said before

Posted - 2006.07.23 11:29:00 - [104]

 

Edited by: c0rn1 on 23/07/2006 11:33:24
"Rage and Terror - making people quit EVE."

As long as the GMs and DEVs let people stretch the game mechanics as much as RA(T) do and allow them to chestbeat with really ****ing people off so far that they quit a good game only because of that small group, so long they got every advantage on their side.
I am playing a game, this is not real life where I have to fight with all possibilities for my survival. Real life is sad enough already that people have no honor and use every lame strategy to their advantage. in personal or business way. I do have that every day. I don't have to have it in a game I want to have "fun" in.
The only thing which RA has the advantage in is just doing things that are considered "lame". CCP did split the community in the people who wanna play the game on a "fun" side and people who just want to win choosing every way by their statement that login traps are the lamest way in eve to get kills. 90+% of the eve community (including me) would never consider login traps as a valid strategy, because it is just lame. If CCP wants to put a balance back up for the fair players then please give us a full fleet covert op device which let people disappear of local please AND the adressbook as well. Or let people who weren't online for the past 15 mins have a login cooldown in space of 10 minutes where they aren't able to activate any module on their ship. 15 minutes because if you crashed in a fight you can login regularly and participate in the fight again. but if you were logged off longer than 15 minutes in space, it can be considered as a NON-incombat crash.
As long as noone of CCP tries to halfway balance things out and make lame tactics come on top of fair play, so long people will quit eve as well because they can't be arsed to play and pay if the DEVs don't care a cent about it.

Cheers.

Posted - 2006.07.23 11:34:00 - [106]

 

Originally by: c0rn1

---

(...) let people who weren't online for the past 15 mins have a login cooldown in space of 10 minutes where they aren't able to activate any module on their ship. 15 minutes because if you crashed in a fight you can login regularly and participate in the fight again. but if you were logged off longer than 15 minutes in space, it can be considered as a NON-incombat crash.
(...)

---

^^ very reasonable, because it addresses crashes

Posted - 2006.07.23 11:42:00 - [108]

 

Watching you whining about logon traps it's so funny.
If you are 12 year children, so you cannot understand that "login trap" is equal to ambush in RL.
It's then you know that enemy will go through this exact place, you bring squad, hide it, mine the road and so on...

So please stop beeing small chindred and admit that it is NOT exploit or whatever (CCP guys understand this :))

And crying about logoff and dirty tactics of gank squads...
Here a grenade for you, go and destroy those 10 tanks...

We not attacked your home, YOU came to us, this is our territory, our rules of engagement, we not intended to give you fun. Just loses. So deal with it.

Aniway GJ RA capital fleet.

Posted - 2006.07.23 11:46:00 - [110]

 

Originally by: Evengard

---

Watching you whining about logon traps it's so funny.
If you are 12 year children, so you cannot understand that "login trap" is equal to ambush in RL.
.

---

Even though this thread is not much about discussing log on trap, wil tell something.

Compering this to RL ambush is uterlly...snip
Cause you cant dispear in RL air as you can be gone in EVE. You can eather be on SS, station or POS.
So, please, dont try to compare it with RL ambush anymore cause its not, no matter how much you want it to be

Please do not bypass the profanity filter ty -zhuge

Posted - 2006.07.23 11:54:00 - [112]

 

Edited by: kbullet on 23/07/2006 11:56:17
Edited by: kbullet on 23/07/2006 11:54:20

Originally by: CT BadIronTree

---

Edited by: CT BadIronTree on 23/07/2006 11:39:51
For kbullet
click

---

well Linkage
do you see me go posting racial comments like that on the forums?... =/

Posted - 2006.07.23 11:57:00 - [114]

 

go red go :)

they seem to be annoying you a lot inside regions you 'control'

Posted - 2006.07.23 11:59:00 - [116]

 

ET, if u think, your wins are based on skill then I have to disappoint you. Only thing what keeps RA alive is
a) variable reinforcement time of POSs.
b) stretching game mechanics to the borders.

for RAT, it's only b).
Wasn't it a GM who initiated the loss off your fleet in front of your POS because you "overstretched" game mechanics? hopefully that was a sign for the future.

regards

Posted - 2006.07.23 12:07:00 - [118]

 

Edited by: nync on 23/07/2006 12:08:48

Originally by: tookar

---

nync i believe noone is saying your dreads logged in . ERA are saying they were happy to engage your dreads if they jumped in but not your added support that did use the lamest of the lame tactics and login on them . Tbh the people boasting here about login traps i find absolutely unbelievable

---

we did not have any support fleet in P7-45V, just covert, interdictor, 2 support cruizers, 2 cynofield generators and 22 capital ships jumping from another system near M53, thats it.

And gratz to ERA for a good fight even outnumbered 2 to 1. They give us a hell of a fight.

Posted - 2006.07.23 12:16:00 - [120]

 

Well i guess its hard to claim if it was a logoff trap or not but the ppl who fight RA know too damn well that they use it on daily basis thats why beleiveing that RA won without using it is realy hard.

RA should enjoy this victory to the extent sicne these I win buttons they use are gonan expire one day ( Hope the WCS penalty come soon) and when login traps are made as an exploit i think we shall all see the real mettle of RA fighting which imo will prob be a nice dissbandment annoncment :P but thats just me imagining i guess

As for the D2 cheerleaders and their allies who coem here cheering for RA , why dont u go deal with the A** whooping that T1 noob fleet ( no dissrepsect to goons i am quoting D2 name) gave ya resulting in 9 dread and 2 carrier losses ?

Respect to ERA since i am very sure they have fought till the bitter END and also congrats to RA on their victory sicne till this moment it is a legitamite victory.