| Author |
Topic |
Mag's
the united
Negative Ten. |
Posted - 2011.08.23 08:50:00 - [ 61]
 Originally by: Alina Wize
Originally by: Mag's
Ahh so your argument is, the old ship hanger had no function other than ship spinning?
Is that not your grievance to the whole hangar "feature"?
Are you a White Tree alt? I ask because you seem to have the same reading and comprehension level. |
Dopehead en Marland |
Posted - 2011.08.23 08:54:00 - [ 62]
ITT: Poor people with crappy computers |
Kunming
Amarr
T.H.U.G L.I.F.E
Xenon-Empire |
Posted - 2011.08.23 08:59:00 - [ 63]
RP wise the CQ is stupid as well. A balcony open to any intruders? Why would a pod pilot, a demi-god, willingly leave the safety of its pod and walk among the common folk of mortals.
CQ has no funtionality beyond giving you a 3D avatar you can play dress-up with. Overall its immersion breaking.
|
Tea Leaves |
Posted - 2011.08.23 09:13:00 - [ 64]
Originally by: Thornat
Let me make sure I got this right Tea Leaves. Your in a one man corp which uses a racist slur for the ticker which I won't repeat and your character is a baby... yet you still come on the forum and talk this much smack. Ya .. consider yourself perma war deced.
Consider your mom perma war dec'd. Some people play this game their own way, that's what EVE is about. But as usual, another pansy arse posting on the forum with their alt. You're so macho. Your mommy must really keep telling you that to reinforce how childish you have to be on the internet spaceship forum. Seriously, unsub now, go to WoW, or go play MLP online. You. Have. No. Balls. |
Cashcow Golden Goose |
Posted - 2011.08.23 09:16:00 - [ 65]
Actually CCP promised nothing at all except to continue on the path to righteous monetisation.
They just worded it so the vast majority thought CCP had relinquished an inch of ground....
gf n1 |
Tea Leaves |
Posted - 2011.08.23 09:34:00 - [ 66]
Edited by: Tea Leaves on 23/08/2011 09:35:21
<B>Forcing players to dock at the captain's quarters is a form of what we actually wanted to get through, which is making Incarna a seamless part of the EVE Online experience.</B>
You know, when I park my car in the garage (above Alina Wize's moms basement) I usually have to walk to the living room. I don't park my car and magically appear there. Maybe I might stop and grab a beer. In this case. I dock my ship, and I'm in the ship hangar. Instead I magically appear in my internet spaceship barbie living room (also above Alina Wize's mom's basement where she resides). I just put my car in the garage, and my butt is on the couch, watching ESPN... with a beer magically in my hand, while wearing my 1000$ USD space pants.
CCP needs to get this sorted. Aside from all the bickering here etc. The link I posted shows exactly what I said. CCP promised 'ship spinning'. SHIP SPINNING as it were was the original VERY USEFUL SHIP HANGAR, and not this garbage they have shoveled down everyones mouth. They promised in a devblog that this would get fixed. We haven't heard a peep in regards to this in over a month. Not a single word. WE'VE GOTTEN NEW NEX STUFF THOUGH. JUST LOOK AT ALINA'S ASS MONOCLE. Since she'll likely and most happily continue to fill this thread with her tripe, garbage and uselessness spewed from it with great force. |
Alina Wize
Dreddit
Test Alliance Please Ignore |
Posted - 2011.08.23 09:39:00 - [ 67]
Originally by: Tea Leaves
And again, you prove your ignorance, stupidity and lack of all around anything regarding common sense or use to the forums:
http://www.eveonline.com/devblog.asp?a=blog&bid=935
Read. OH WAIT YOU CAN'T. Because you need those remedial reading courses I mentioned in another post on the forums. Your negligence precedes you.
The original ship hangar provided far more use than the internet spaceship barbies you apparently so dearly love. Where pray is your monocle? Firmly attached to your ass which you continue to keep spouting from on the forums? That's what I thought.
People Who Annoy You for 1000 Alex...
NAGGERS.
For the sake of our argument, I have CQ disabled on all of my accounts. I just read through the dev blog post again and I don't see your point. All I see are references to ship spinning. Which has no real value outside of sentimental. I have a feeling you'll be a part of the "Bring Back The Door" crowd once it's all reversed huh. |
Tea Leaves |
Posted - 2011.08.23 09:40:00 - [ 68]
Originally by: Alina Wize
Originally by: Tea Leaves
And again, you prove your ignorance, stupidity and lack of all around anything regarding common sense or use to the forums:
http://www.eveonline.com/devblog.asp?a=blog&bid=935
Read. OH WAIT YOU CAN'T. Because you need those remedial reading courses I mentioned in another post on the forums. Your negligence precedes you.
The original ship hangar provided far more use than the internet spaceship barbies you apparently so dearly love. Where pray is your monocle? Firmly attached to your ass which you continue to keep spouting from on the forums? That's what I thought.
People Who Annoy You for 1000 Alex...
NAGGERS.
For the sake of our argument, I have CQ disabled on all of my accounts. I just read through the dev blog post again and I don't see your point. All I see are references to ship spinning. Which has no real value outside of sentimental. I have a feeling you'll be a part of the "Bring Back The Door" crowd once it's all reversed huh.
If you know what you're doing, you can replace the door.png with something more... exotic... |
Brooks Puuntai
Minmatar
Nomadic Asylum
|
Posted - 2011.08.23 10:07:00 - [ 69]
Edited by: Brooks Puuntai on 23/08/2011 10:07:12
Ship spinning made Eve what it is. CCP could make Ship Spinning its own offline game and it will prob sell better then Dust. Just saying.
Also I wouldn't expect to see it come back anytime soon. I'm still waiting for the old cyno effect, engine trails, and the Quafe girl to come back. |
Louis deGuerre
Gallente
Malevolence.
|
Posted - 2011.08.23 10:07:00 - [ 70]
CCP promises...what are they worth ?
Will definitely looks at CCP's actions here. |
Aaron Aardvark
Amarr |
Posted - 2011.08.23 10:19:00 - [ 71]
WHAT THEY DO NOT WHAT THEY SAY.
|
Alina Wize
Dreddit
Test Alliance Please Ignore |
Posted - 2011.08.23 10:21:00 - [ 72]
Originally by: Brooks Puuntai
Edited by: Brooks Puuntai on 23/08/2011 10:07:12
Ship spinning made Eve what it is. CCP could make Ship Spinning its own offline game and it will prob sell better then Dust. Just saying.
Also I wouldn't expect to see it come back anytime soon. I'm still waiting for the old cyno effect, engine trails, and the Quafe girl to come back.
Why don't you put your efforts into real problems like Gallente, POS, Sov Warfare, Mining(lol), etc. These things you're complaining about aren't real problems. |
Brooks Puuntai
Minmatar
Nomadic Asylum
|
Posted - 2011.08.23 10:34:00 - [ 73]
Originally by: Alina Wize
Originally by: Brooks Puuntai
Edited by: Brooks Puuntai on 23/08/2011 10:07:12
Ship spinning made Eve what it is. CCP could make Ship Spinning its own offline game and it will prob sell better then Dust. Just saying.
Also I wouldn't expect to see it come back anytime soon. I'm still waiting for the old cyno effect, engine trails, and the Quafe girl to come back.
Why don't you put your efforts into real problems like Gallente, POS, Sov Warfare, Mining(lol), etc. These things you're complaining about aren't real problems.
This is true. I was just giving examples of things that CCP has removed and said they would bring back(except the Quafe girl, but one can dream). |
CCP Navigator
C C P
C C P Alliance |
Posted - 2011.08.23 10:36:00 - [ 74]
Thread cleaned of several off topic comments and subsequent posts. |
Brooks Puuntai
Minmatar
Nomadic Asylum
|
Posted - 2011.08.23 10:52:00 - [ 75]
Originally by: CCP Navigator
Thread cleaned of several off topic comments and subsequent posts.
I see you doing some stealth moderation. How dare you hide your blue bars! |
Vyktor Abyss
The Abyss Corporation |
Posted - 2011.08.23 10:59:00 - [ 76]
Awww with that title I hoped you were going to list all the CCP broken promises like some jilted lover...
Here I'll get you started with a couple:
1. Cosmos 2.0
2. Faction War revamp
|
Shartifartblast
Minmatar
In Praise Of Shadows |
Posted - 2011.08.23 11:04:00 - [ 77]
3. No RMT
4. AF bonus revisited |
Miss Hurricane |
Posted - 2011.08.23 11:06:00 - [ 78]
I completly agree with the OP... This new captains quaters sucks imo... It fails to an epic extent and I agree with over 50% of the eve population when they say... GIVE ME BACK MY ORIGINAL HANGER!  |
Alina Wize
Dreddit
Test Alliance Please Ignore |
Posted - 2011.08.23 11:32:00 - [ 79]
|
Kass Rasaan
Gallente
Satan's Escorts
UNITED OLD TIMERS |
Posted - 2011.08.23 12:15:00 - [ 80]
I'll agree with the OP in that CCP should keep CQ but allow ship spinning instead of a door, however I feel that most if not all people only want ship spinning back because of nostalgia, and it would provide no more functionality than the door would, except it wouldn't take a whole second to find out what ship you're in. And besides, ship spinning is vaguely more interesting and putting it back would shut a few people up and perhaps would make CCP look like it still cares about it's subscribers. |
Shartifartblast
Minmatar
In Praise Of Shadows |
Posted - 2011.08.23 12:30:00 - [ 81]
The following are as superfluous as ship spinning and might as well be removed in favour of buggy, badly developed new content which serves no purpose:
Mission descriptions
The eve intro movie*
backdrop nebulas
environmental effects**
concord billboards
about 30% of the frigate lineup
auto targeters
flashing lights on ships like the comet
concord retaliation of aggressed outlaws in high-sec***
*oh wait that has been nerfed already
**oh wait recon 3/3, j-space effects and various plex environmentals have been removed already
*** oh wait, you can circumvent this while camping gates to high-sec by putting an alt on the high-sec gate with an orca, putting your ship in the orca and instantly jumping it out while you warp your pod off to safety. |
Emmely Chi |
Posted - 2011.08.23 14:20:00 - [ 82]
Yepp give me ships spinning back. pretty please CCP I pray on my knees...   |
Razin
The xDEATHx Squadron
Legion of xXDEATHXx |
Posted - 2011.08.23 14:26:00 - [ 83]
Originally by: White Tree
I believe CCP is in fact working on returning some form of ship spinning to the game.
" Is working"? Are you quite sure? This is definitely the case where we should look at what CCP does and not what they say (which wasn't much or useful anyway so no loss there). |
CyberRaver
Wildly Inappropriate |
Posted - 2011.08.23 15:35:00 - [ 84]
I just dont understand how your having issues running it? I have a dual core phenom overclocked to 3.8 (like 60 quid) A cheap asrock mobo worth 30 quid DDR2 and a 5770 worth like 99 quid now And it laughs at CQ and much of eve  Buy something thats not from the stone age perhaps? |
Barbelo Valentinian
Gallente
The Scope
|
Posted - 2011.08.23 16:05:00 - [ 85]
Edited by: Barbelo Valentinian on 23/08/2011 16:20:50 Originally by: White Tree
I believe CCP is in fact working on returning some form of ship spinning to the game.
As a CSM person, can you clarify please:- By "ship spinning", CCP and CSM understand that's just using shorthand for the Hangar functionality we used to have (being able to see what ship you're in at a glance when you are in dock, and having the little bits of functionality we've lost wrt double-clicking and right-clicking)? The spinning aspect was fun, but it wasn't nearly as important as the functionality, and the fact that functionality was ingrained, and felt like "home". So could you please confirm that by "the return of ship spinning" both CCP and CSM mean something like "the return of the Hangar functionality we used to have" (both with CQ on and with CQ off)? I'd also like to know: if CCP plan on re-introducing that functionality, but keeping CQ as default, will they be re-jigging the lore to accommodate the fact that pod pilots now casually decant every time they dock? It's a really jarring feature of "default CQ" that it goes against the lore. I would much prefer the "new Hangar" to be default, and CQ an option off that, but if we must have "CQ as default", then please CCP re-jig the lore. You know, something like "Breaking news! Advances in pod technology have been enabled by the discovery of xxxx - now the process of decanting is far less troublesome and disorienting than it used to be. Capsuleers across New Eden overjoyed at their new-found ability to get in and out of their pods at the drop of a hat!!!" |
Sneaky Neko
Caldari Deep Space Ventures |
Posted - 2011.08.23 16:14:00 - [ 86]
I'm sorry, but if your computer is overheating that's your fault not CCPs. Buy an extra fan or something, but your computer is inadequately cooled. |
Soi Mala
Whacky Waving Inflatable Flailing Arm Tubemen |
Posted - 2011.08.23 17:18:00 - [ 87]
Originally by: Sneaky Neko
I'm sorry, but if your computer is overheating that's your fault not CCPs. Buy an extra fan or something, but your computer is inadequately cooled.
Or they could code more effectively. My machine doesn't overheat, but it DOES play crysis 2 and many other modern games at a silky vsynch'd 60fps. Yet CQ seems to sit between 30-40. But no you're totally right. A small, barley decorated room with a static couch, mirror, and table in it is far more taxing to render than realistic, destructible cityscapes full of marauding aliens/soldiers. You're totally right, we should all just splash out, and just throw more computing power at this. |
All Channels
EVE General Discussion