open All Channels
seplocked Features and Ideas Discussion
blankseplocked Lets Cut The Malarkey Out Right Now !!!!
 
This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 
Author Topic

Wu Phat
Posted - 2011.06.23 19:53:00 - [1]
 

Dreadnought's need a buff and Super carriers need a nurf. Just a thought but the Dreadnought bye definition are large warships designed to destroy other large or larger warships. So the role is to kill other caps, super or not & structures.

Two things separates the Dread from Mothership, EHP and movement. What I mean bye movement is that a Mothership does not have to go into siege mode to do great deal of DP's and can not be held down bye non-interdiction methods. This is where the difference should stop besides price. What could be fixed is the EHP difference. One or the other class should not have a clear cut advantage in this field. So the EHP of Dread's go up alittle (only in siege would you see the effects which buffs and nurfs it) and the Mothership gets a cut in EHP.

Based on size the Titian really only deserved it's EHP buff given to it bye the Dominion patch. The Mothership size in scale is no larger then a Dreadnought. What I am purposing is that the Mothership get a EHP Nurf while the Dreadnought gets a EHP Buff while only in siege mode that rivals the Mothership. The change should be able to take 2-3 DD hits from a Titan no more.

Now post tell me if I am crazy.

Wu Phat
Posted - 2011.06.24 15:57:00 - [2]
 

Bump

Barbara Nichole
Cryogenic Consultancy
Black Sun Alliance
Posted - 2011.06.24 19:33:00 - [3]
 

dude, this is the millionth thread with no new content about this same topic... Since CCP has already said they are on the job where this issue is concerned, we really don't need a millionth and first thread about supercarriers and dreads.




Wu Phat
Posted - 2011.06.25 14:47:00 - [4]
 

Originally by: Barbara Nichole
dude, this is the millionth thread with no new content about this same topic... Since CCP has already said they are on the job where this issue is concerned, we really don't need a millionth and first thread about supercarriers and dreads.






Will everyone knows CCP has a hard head. So bashing them in the head with balanced realistic fix's over and over again. Also rejecting there fail patch attempts is the only why to get your point across. Be helpful and post another Hybrid buff proposal will ya or how about go protest again today in Jita, Amarr, & some how get to Rens and Dodixie this time.

Tanaka Atsuko
Gallente
4 chan
Posted - 2011.06.25 16:09:00 - [5]
 

yeah +1

Wu Phat
Posted - 2011.06.26 14:21:00 - [6]
 

up

Wu Phat
Posted - 2011.06.27 13:03:00 - [7]
 

Does not help for you guys to look. Post something +1 or -1. if you don't show interest CCP will not.

Wu Phat
Posted - 2011.07.13 16:32:00 - [8]
 

bump

EnderCapitalG
Caldari
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
Posted - 2011.07.13 16:39:00 - [9]
 

Something like this is already in the works and will (maybe) happen by winter.

Until then, ~Supercaps Online~.

De'Veldrin
Minmatar
Norse'Storm Battle Group
Intrepid Crossing
Posted - 2011.07.13 16:41:00 - [10]
 

Not supported for the simple fact that you keep bumping an unnecessary topic. In fact, I propose CCP just remove Dreads from the game entirely. Screw em.

HELLBOUNDMAN
Posted - 2011.07.13 17:29:00 - [11]
 

I still prefer the idea another player and I had suggested of taking tier 3 bs's and making a tech 2 version of them that was considered a capital buster.

There turrets and crap would suck at hitting anything smaller than a sub cap but would have quite good buffs at killing subs, caps, and supers.

Cap busting t2 battlships is a good solution to popping OP super carriers.


 

This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 


The new forums are live

Please adjust your bookmarks to https://forums.eveonline.com

These forums are archived and read-only