Posted - 2010.08.26 22:18:00 - [452]

 

Machine Info

• Which test you were in: 26 August 20:00


• OS version: Windows 7 Professional 64 bit


• CPU: Intel i5 750 (2.67GHz)


• GPU: ATI Radeon HD 5850


• RAM: 4GB

User Experience

• Did you have Audio enabled? Both normal and EveVoice.


• Did you have brackets turned on? No most of the time.


• Average FPS during the test(s): 40-60 (v-sync on)


• Did you notice any desyncs during the test?: When attempting the jump into Poitot I was told I was more than 2500m from the gate when my overview said I was 700m away.


• On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? 7

PI Tests: Everything responded instantly and flawlessly
Jump Tests: On one occasion I seemed to desync and on all occasions (spamming jump or no) I was not loading anyone else using the Gate, only those who cynod in showed up on my overview.
Warp tests: Didn't notice any funny behaviour, I aligned and warped as usual it seemed to me.
Combat: Targeting was responsive, modules were auto-cycling well, no more than 1-2 seconds of module lag when activating/deactivating.

The only major problem was the complete lack of any ships being apparent on the field.

Posted - 2010.08.26 22:24:00 - [454]

 

Machine Info


* Which test you were in: 26 August 20:00

* OS version: Windows XP Home 32bit

* CPU: Intel P4 (3.06GHz)

* GPU: ATI Radeon HD 2600PRO

* RAM: 1.5GB




User Experience


* Did you have Audio enabled? Only eve voice.

* Did you have brackets turned on? No.

* Average FPS during the test(s): 2FPS during the battle

* Did you notice any desyncs during the test?: Didn't notice any desyncs.

* On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? 9

* Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc: No noticeable lag, weapons cycled fine, just very low FPS (more an issue of my PC though)

Posted - 2010.08.26 22:49:00 - [456]

 

Edited by: Nemiron on 27/08/2010 13:52:35
Edited by: Nemiron on 26/08/2010 22:50:54
Test: 2010-08-26
OS: Vista Home Premium 32bit
CPU: AMD 7750 Dual-Core 2,7 GHz
GPU: ATI Radeon HD 4500
Mem: 4GB
Audio: off
Brackets: off
FPS: 20 zoomed in 40 zoomed out
Weapons: grouped

Experience: Very good throughout (most of) the test. Minor lag when jumping, none in the PI test.

Shooting stuff went good in the beginning. But then about in the middle of the carnage, the guns failed to response at all. It was not module lag, it was just as if I had not klicked on them at all. Nothing green, nothing red. Other modules resonded, though.

Didn't hit anything after that. Crashed when trying to jump to FD-MLJ.

Posted - 2010.08.27 00:45:00 - [458]

 

Machine Info

• Which test you were in: Aug 26, 2010


• OS version Win 7 64


• CPU Intel P8600 2.4 ghz


• GPU ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670


• RAM 4 GB

User Experience
[list]

Did you have Audio enabled? N / Eve voice yet

Did you have brackets turned on? No

Average FPS during the test(s) 45 - 55

Did you notice any desyncs during the test? No

On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 7

Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.

Overall very good. Main issue was over view was not loading anything but caps so very hard to shoot anything else :)

Lag, jump and other was by far better than on TQ

Posted - 2010.08.27 01:49:00 - [460]

 

Machine Info

Which test you were in: August 26, 2010

OS version: Vista 64bit

CPU: AMD Athlon II x2 245

GPU: ATI HD4550 1GB

RAM: 2GB


User Experience

Did you have Audio enabled? Yes

Did you have brackets turned on? Only non fleet

Average FPS during the test(s): 20-30 FPS

Did you notice any desyncs during the test? None

On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? 5

Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.

Never done big fleet fights on TQ so hard to compare but everything seemed to load fine aside from the one grid glitch I think everyone noticed.

Posted - 2010.08.27 09:03:00 - [462]

 

Originally by: Hawk TT

---

Suggestions regarding the test procedure / organization:
1. The MOTD of the MassTesting chat channel has to be updated along with Forum Thread update. I've logged 90 minutes prior to the test start time and the MOTD was still the one from Aug 19 - confusing!

---

Yeah. I read it an hour before the test and then it didn't say anything about the planetary test so I missed to bring a control thingie with me.

Posted - 2010.08.27 09:58:00 - [464]

 

Edited by: Blazde on 28/08/2010 14:30:58
Which test you were in: 26th Aug

OS version: XP SP3 Pro
CPU: Intel Core 2 Duo E6600
GPU: Nvidia Geforce GT 240
RAM: 2Gb


Did you have Audio enabled?
Just EVE voice and it worked fine this time (last week it took an hour to join the fleet voice channel)

Did you have brackets turned on?
Mostly not

Average FPS during the test(s)
Didn't check but it seemed decent

Did you notice any desyncs during the test?
Yes, right from the start at the planet when everyone was jostling at the warp-in. I warped one my clients out/back in specifically to resync it with the server's view and look for desyncs and found a lot of position differences of between rougly 1km and 5km. Later on after jumping plenty of sub-cap ships were missing on one or both clients so everything was out of whack.

On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome)
Not 100% sure what this is asking, the client seemed pretty smooth so 5 vs TQ in that respect, but obviously all the issues made the whole experience way worse than TQ

Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.
There was a lot of weirdness going on with ships not appearing on overview/inspace, couple of things I noted specifically:
- After one of the jumps pretty much no subcap ships appeared (from either fleet) on one my clients, but a lot of the capitals did. (I wasn't paying attention to my other client at the time so not sure if that was the same.) We were fleet warped off the gate to the next one and it wasn't until landing that what looked like everyone appeared again for me. The second fleet warped in behind us a bit later and were all visible at that point too.
- During the fight one my clients (A) couldn't see the other (B), while B could see A. I had B watchlisted on client A and the health bars weren't showing as if it were off grid. I also tried broadcasting for armour with B, and client A saw the broadcast but wasn't able to use it to get a lock (like happens when someone broadcasts but then leaves grid). Other people were able to see client B's ship because I got shot a bit and people repped me after I broadcasted.

Edit:
Completely forgot to mention the other issues:
- When I first undocked before the test one client had duplicated gates/station/ship on overview, two copies of every item. Haven't seen this old bug in a long time. It didn't happen again during the rest of the test
- Had a socket closed error on one client during the planet test. I know these have affected some people a lot but I haven't had them much (ever?) before
- A CTD in d3d9.dll after viewing the planet. I've never had it before, but then I don't usually use planet view

Posted - 2010.08.28 11:55:00 - [466]

 

Edited by: Silent Twilight on 28/08/2010 11:59:43
Edited by: Silent Twilight on 28/08/2010 11:57:28
Machine Info
* Which test you were in: August 26th - Fleet X
* OS version: winXP Pro SP2 32-bit
* CPU: Core 2 Duo @ 3.00 GHz
* GPU: nVidia GeForce 8800GT
* RAM: 2 GB

User Experience
* Did you have Audio enabled?
Yes.

* Did you have brackets turned on?
Off most of the time. Switched them on occasionaly without any notable impact on FPS until the fight started and drones were deployed. Then FPS dropped severily.

* Average FPS during the test(s)
~15 close up most of the time.
~30-50 zoomed out.
~1-5 during the fight with all brackets on.

* Did you notice any desyncs during the test?
No.

* Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.
Because of the small fleet sizes, practically everything related to modules and ship/drone control worked fine. However, there were some minor issues.

* Ship info was not displayed for some ships. Just an image on an empty field.
* Drone attack icon got stuck to the locked and once attacked target, so it seemed as if they were still attacking even after calling them off or switching to another target. Can't say about battleships as they died too fast, but every capship I attacked with drones remained with the drone icon for the whole time locked.
* Didn't notice any difference between spam-jumping and single-click jumping. In both cases it took approximately the same time, only in spam case I got the message about session change.
* According to my fleetmate in a dread, after a gate jump he couldn't see any ship besides capitals. He was receiving damage from my BS's guns and drones, and in the case of drones he saw them appearing out of nowhere when I let them out and disappearing when they returned to drone bay. I also tried to bump him and saw him turning and drifting away, but from his point of view he wasn't moving. I couldn't see subcapitals too, except for a few battleships, which could have jumped earlier.
* Before the last gate jump into the fight I received a message about being farther than 2500 m and it was true as I was some 3000+ meters away. But continued to receive this notice even after moving into jump range and even to 0 from the gate. After about 10 s of repeating jump order within jump range this notice stopped showing, and I finally jumped through.
* During the fight there were occasional capship locking difficulties. Suddenly they became invulnerable as if in warp.
* Overview glitch, when broadcast icons appear on random overview items.

Posted - 2010.09.02 22:10:00 - [468]

 

Machine Info

Which test you were in: September 2 @ 20:00.

OS version : Windows 7.

CPU : Intel Quadcore 2.5Mhz .

GPU :Two - GeForce GTX+ 9800 Nvidia - On Dual Sli.

RAM :4GB.


User Experience

Did you have Audio enabled?: Yes.

Did you have brackets turned on?:No.

Average FPS during the test : 18.5 FPS.

Did you notice any desyncs during the test?: A bit of lag while loading the system I was Jumping to.

On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome): 8.

Describe your experience: It was fun, my FPS went down to 3 but that was probably because I was dualboxing.

Posted - 2010.09.02 22:20:00 - [470]

 

September 2nd @ 20:00
win7 64 bit
Intel Core 2 Duo 6600 @ 2.4 GHz
Radeon HD 4350
5 gigs

Audio was on.
Brackets were enabled.
35 fps (turned most graphics down to lowest setting and all effects off)
No desyncs
7
Was fun had a good time, understood CCP staff easily enough, and will probably do again.

Posted - 2010.09.02 22:23:00 - [472]

 

Edited by: Shiu Juan on 02/09/2010 22:39:07
Which test you were in: 2 Sep 2010 @ 20:00
OS version: Linux Ubuntu 9.10, Wine 1.1.31
CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) X2 245 Processor stepping 02
GPU: nVidia Corporation G92 [GeForce GTS 250]
RAM: 4GB


User Experience
* Did you have Audio enabled? Yes
* Did you have brackets turned on? Yes, for part of until I could get the UI to catch my request to turn them off
* Average FPS during the test(s) 20 up to fleet fight, then went to fractional
* Did you notice any desyncs during the test? No
* On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 5 - Not been in a fight this size on TQ, so no basis for comparison.
* Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.

I saw lag. It took a while from when I requested to when my drones actually launched, and targetting took longer than it should have for the first primary (ie given my sensor strength and size of target it should not have taken 60 seconds to lock. However, this is likely normal for big fights. I realized I did not have my damage control running, and it took about 60 seconds for it come start spinning.
My notes:
21:39 15s grid load
21:55 logserver reported to be crashed, but it was still running, so will submit the save file.

I should note that I need to remember how to dial back my graphics, since I think some of the slowness was memory or CPU at my end.

Posted - 2010.09.02 22:33:00 - [474]

 

Test: September 2nd @ 20:00
Os version: Win7 64x
CPU: AMD 6400+ x2
GPU: 8800GT @ 1920x1080
RAM 4GB

Audio was Enabled.
Brakcets were Turned on.
Average FPS (during fleet movments - no combat) 30~ fps
Average FPS (During Combat) 3~ fps

No desyncs during test for me, only lag was on cyno jump where i got traffic control. however this always cleared within 30 seconds
On a scale of 1-10 i have to give a 6, as it is nice having no module lag.

Once again a very nice test where i had minimal issues, though could u find a way to say "prepare to jump" without using the j word :P

Posted - 2010.09.02 22:37:00 - [476]

 

Edited by: Devroush on 02/09/2010 22:39:57
Edited by: Devroush on 02/09/2010 22:38:12
Which test you were in: September 2 @ 20:00.

CPU: Intel Core i7 1.6Ghz .
GPU: ATI Mobility 4570
RAM: 4GB.
OS version: Windows 7 64-bit.

User Experience

Did you have Audio enabled?: yes, as well as Eve Voice
Did you have brackets turned on?: no
Average FPS during the test: most of the time 30 FPS, 10 FPS in the fleet battle.

Did you notice any desyncs during the test?: not really
On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome): 7, I would give more but only 300 people showed up so not sure how representative this is.

Describe your experience: Lag was quite doable. Jumping into systems never took me more than a minute and grid loaded smooth. Some lag in fleet battle but auto-repeat kept playing nicely.

Posted - 2010.09.02 22:43:00 - [478]

 

Machine Info

•Which test you were in: Sep 02 @ 20:00

* OS version: XP SP3
* CPU: P4, 2.6GHz + P4, 2.6GHz
* GPU: ATI asus AH3650 AGP
* RAM: 2 GB

User Experience

•Did you have Audio enabled? yes, fleet voice
•Did you have brackets turned on? no
•Average FPS during the test(s) up to 3-10
•Did you notice any desyncs during the test? no
•On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 9
•Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.
The best we have seen ever. Tobad there was so few this time.
Modules: didnt see any lagging there (only a very short delay for activating). Got a delay for 2 min 30 sec., when mass jumping thru gates.

Posted - 2010.09.02 22:55:00 - [480]

 

Test: 2010-09-02
OS: Vista Home Premium 32bit
CPU: AMD 7750 Dual-Core 2,7 GHz
GPU: ATI Radeon HD 4500
Mem: 4GB
Audio: off
Brackets: off
FPS: about 20
Weapons: grouped
Fleet Voice enabled

User Experience:
Very good. About 10 secs jump lag, 1 sec module lag. Don't know if it was for the lack of people online. Warping out and in during the end of the fight was no problem at all.

Best I had on Sisi this far.