open All Channels
seplocked EVE Information Portal
blankseplocked New Dev Blog: The 4th CSM - results!
 
This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 
Pages: [1] 2 3

Author Topic

CCP Fallout

Posted - 2009.12.02 16:43:00 - [1]
 

Your votes have been tallied! We are very pleased to announce the next group of representatives for the Fourth Council of Stellar Management. Read CCP Xhagen's newest dev blog for the list of your new reps, and a breakdown on the voting.

Frogman Henry
Republic Military School
Posted - 2009.12.02 16:44:00 - [2]
 

OK

Siigari Kitawa
Gallente
Perditus Peregrinus
Posted - 2009.12.02 16:48:00 - [3]
 

Cool. Congrats guys o/

TeaDaze
Agony Unleashed
Agony Empire
Posted - 2009.12.02 16:54:00 - [4]
 

Thanks for the support Very Happy

Altaree
The Graduates
Morsus Mihi
Posted - 2009.12.02 16:56:00 - [5]
 

Congrats to ALL! Especially to ElvenLord!

Marlona Sky
Caldari Provisions
Posted - 2009.12.02 17:06:00 - [6]
 

Please bring dignity back to the CSM guys.

Vuk Lau
4S Corporation
Morsus Mihi
Posted - 2009.12.02 17:12:00 - [7]
 

Congrats to everyone, esp. my friend Elvenlord. Nice lineup tbh, tho I am REALLY sad Herschel just cant make it into CSM, he would be awesome delegate. Looks like only solution for him is to join 4S and RAWR :D


Vuk Lau
4S Corporation
Morsus Mihi
Posted - 2009.12.02 17:17:00 - [8]
 

Also its sad to see bad turnout by voters, esp cause there was so many good candidates.

Nika Dekaia
Posted - 2009.12.02 17:18:00 - [9]
 

Congrats to the winners.

Unfortunatelly, I was drunk when I voted and don't know if my candidates actually won. Embarassed

Vuk Lau
4S Corporation
Morsus Mihi
Posted - 2009.12.02 17:23:00 - [10]
 

Originally by: Nika Dekaia
Congrats to the winners.

Unfortunatelly, I was drunk when I voted and don't know if my candidates actually won. Embarassed


Well at least you voted :D And voting guarantees citizenship :D

Aineko Macx
Posted - 2009.12.02 17:23:00 - [11]
 

Congratz guys!

Originally by: Vuk Lau
tho I am REALLY sad Herschel just cant make it into CSM, he would be awesome delegate.

This.

Luminus Aardokay
Gallente
SI Radio
Split Infinity.
Posted - 2009.12.02 17:25:00 - [12]
 

Congratulations people! We have high hopes for you. I'm also really glad to see that 3 out of the 7 people that appeared on the Planet Risk Show debates made it to the board (and Helen Highwater aaaaaaaaalmost made it in).

I am though kind of bitter to see that the voter turnout was less than even the first CSM elections... And I do believe that this is partly a communication fault. It has not been adequately communicated in the front eve-o page with big flashing graphics.. and it hasn't been made crystal clear how important this concept is.

Buuuut.. nevertheless.. no whining now.. time to crack open the bubbly =)


Clone 1
Posted - 2009.12.02 17:31:00 - [13]
 

Yea, the votes seem to be dwindling but the third CSM bucked the trend

First CSM: 24,651 11.08%
Second CSM: 20,112 8.16%
Third CSM: 27,848 9.74%
Fourth CSM: 21,158 7.36%



Alekseyev Karrde
Noir.
Noir. Mercenary Group
Posted - 2009.12.02 17:37:00 - [14]
 

Proud to be on the council, thanks for the massive support you guys!

olzi
Caldari
NPC Corporation
Paisti Syndicate
Posted - 2009.12.02 17:37:00 - [15]
 

The full election list takes you to a page that shows only the elected candidates. Is there a way to see how many votes every candidate that participated received ?

Oh, and go Finland, we like to vote. Razz

Nidhiesk
Posted - 2009.12.02 17:42:00 - [16]
 

Edited by: Nidhiesk on 02/12/2009 17:42:35
Originally by: Alekseyev Karrde
Proud to be on the council, thanks for the massive support you guys!


You better not mess this up. I don't think I or anybody will have to remind you when you make a decision or when you think about it you affect lots of people. So be careful.

I'm saying this cause your in Noir. and its a merc corp. I'm not sure what you really think about Eve outside of the pvp world but from my experience not many "mercs" or "pirates" don't think to highly of it. Some would say remove everything that is not pvp.

LaVista Vista
Conservative Shenanigans Party
Posted - 2009.12.02 17:47:00 - [17]
 

1 vote difference between 2nd and 3rd place! Shocked

It's interesting to see a Russian person elected. That has been a player-base that hasn't been represented thus far.

Congratz to everybody.

TeaDaze
Agony Unleashed
Agony Empire
Posted - 2009.12.02 18:04:00 - [18]
 

Originally by: olzi
The full election list takes you to a page that shows only the elected candidates. Is there a way to see how many votes every candidate that participated received ?


Full results here

Rakshasa Taisab
Caldari
Sane Industries Inc.
Posted - 2009.12.02 18:14:00 - [19]
 

Originally by: Clone 1
Yea, the votes seem to be dwindling but the third CSM bucked the trend

First CSM: 24,651 11.08%
Second CSM: 20,112 8.16%
Third CSM: 27,848 9.74%
Fourth CSM: 21,158 7.36%

Limiting players to 2x 1/2 year terms has quickly dwindled the pool of candidates into obscurity. The first few elections I knew who they were by their forum/game presence.

Now, not at all. Perhaps add a 2-3 year cooldown period after which they can again run for galactic domination.

Bagehi
Association of Commonwealth Enterprises
Posted - 2009.12.02 18:23:00 - [20]
 

Originally by: Rakshasa Taisab

Limiting players to 2x 1/2 year terms has quickly dwindled the pool of candidates into obscurity. The first few elections I knew who they were by their forum/game presence.

Now, not at all. Perhaps add a 2-3 year cooldown period after which they can again run for galactic domination.


I think that actually points to something different, namely that some of the more outspoken people on forums and/or in-game aren't willing to run for CSM. This could tie in with the CSM voting turn-out.

Ma Eies
Posted - 2009.12.02 18:32:00 - [21]
 

i wonder, at what point will CCP drop the CSM idea, how low does the subscriber interest have to go? 5%? 1%?

Zaiyo Modi
Minmatar
Posted - 2009.12.02 19:12:00 - [22]
 

It is unfortunate that not all of the csm candidates has a resume of sorts. Several of the links offered in the voting window were not linked to any campaign page.

Cire XIII
Caldari
Ever Flow
Northern Coalition.
Posted - 2009.12.02 19:16:00 - [23]
 

Originally by: Zaiyo Modi
It is unfortunate that not all of the csm candidates has a resume of sorts. Several of the links offered in the voting window were not linked to any campaign page.
Yea, I kind of hope they make it mandatory to have an easy to access platform/resume. I have been able to find someone to vote comfortably so far, but there may have been better candidates with worse marketing.

En Passant
Posted - 2009.12.02 20:00:00 - [24]
 

I think that you may consider something when looking at the smaller countries and coming to the conclusion that they are more interested in the election.

The real number that isn't being shown here is Subscriber vs. Account. While every account is given a vote, a subscriber will typically spend all votes on a single candidate.

This means in populations where 1 in 3 people get 3 votes (accounts), for 6 accounts you are counting 6 votes, when in reality there were only 3 People, one with 3 more votes than the others. By default, smaller populations will always look "more interested" than the larger ones because the weight of multiple accounts is far heavier than in larger populations.

Louis deGuerre
Gallente
Malevolence.
Posted - 2009.12.02 20:55:00 - [25]
 

Heh, ElvenLord leading the council.

EVE is slowly turning in WoW Crying or Very sad

Ankhesentapemkah
Gallente
Posted - 2009.12.02 21:44:00 - [26]
 

0.0 candidates retain their voters, but neutral players just seem to have lost interest. Must say that CCP keeps failing to create publicity for the CSM.

Meissa Anunthiel
Redshift Industrial
Rooks and Kings
Posted - 2009.12.02 21:50:00 - [27]
 

I purposefully didn't campaign much this run, I wanted to get in as an alt, that's what I got, so I'm happy :-)

Nika Dekaia
Posted - 2009.12.02 22:12:00 - [28]
 

Originally by: Ankhesentapemkah
0.0 candidates retain their voters, but neutral players just seem to have lost interest. Must say that CCP keeps failing to create publicity for the CSM.
Can't see how CCP could make poeple vote for CSM if they don't want to.

If the players don't see how the CSM actually HAS influenced the introduction of player based wanted features (no matter if carebear/pirate or 0.0 dweller) to the game and how the CSM triggered statements from CCP on stuff which will/might be introduced or why not, it's the loss of every player not voting.

There is a distinct lack of industrial/marketing stuff beeing introduced, though.

Misaki Yuuko
Caldari
Posted - 2009.12.02 22:16:00 - [29]
 

Originally by: Ankhesentapemkah
0.0 candidates retain their voters, but neutral players just seem to have lost interest. Must say that CCP keeps failing to create publicity for the CSM.


Your ignorance shows (again). What are you especting after the discontent with last patch extreme hype (as usually) for later dissapointment and 11th hour changes and broken promises?


Doesn't matter how much they try to market it, if they fail to deliver prople will 8as it's happening) lose interest in CSM.

LegendaryFrog
Caldari
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
Posted - 2009.12.02 22:24:00 - [30]
 

Actually, i would attribute the lower percentage of voters to the decline in the "novelness" of the CSM. It isn't as "oo shiny!" as it used to be, and the voters have mostly collapsed into appropriate voting blocks behind articular candidates.


Pages: [1] 2 3

This thread is older than 90 days and has been locked due to inactivity.


 


The new forums are live

Please adjust your bookmarks to https://forums.eveonline.com

These forums are archived and read-only